|
New Theory
|
|
Topic Started: Nov 8 2008, 12:49 PM (673 Views)
|
|
Goodsbee
|
Nov 10 2008, 03:10 PM
Post #31
|
life is grand :)
- Posts:
- 5,199
- Group:
- A414A Member
- Member
- #105
- Joined:
- July 20, 2008
|
- Ultra-Musketeer
- Nov 10 2008, 12:31 PM
gooback, Jam, Redemption, you nerdy nubs are beginning to confuse me.
LMAO!
|
|
|
| |
|
Jam
|
Nov 10 2008, 04:16 PM
Post #32
|
Fruit Based Jam
- Posts:
- 7,945
- Group:
- A414A Member
- Member
- #98
- Joined:
- July 11, 2008
|
- Ultra-Musketeer
- Nov 10 2008, 07:31 AM
gooback, Jam, Redemption, you nerdy nubs are beginning to confuse me.
Then it is you who is the nub, and who's socks need a washing. Not because they're dirty I'd presume.
|
|
Long live Carolus
|
| |
|
Incog
|
Nov 10 2008, 04:49 PM
Post #33
|
CHEERIO!
- Posts:
- 21,769
- Group:
- French
- Member
- #6
- Joined:
- December 13, 2007
|
- gooback
- Nov 10 2008, 02:01 AM
sorry to break up this friendly discussion, but you are all wrong (except for Jam, who truly is harnessing power from a nuclear holocaust) What you are experiencing is the energy inside of the nuclues. In a nucleus of say, uranium, there are 92 protons. Now think, protons are all positively charged, yet they are all so close together in the atom, so what keeps them together??? ENERGY, there is actually energy keeping a nucleus together, and when an atom is split, it requires less energy to hold the nucleus together, and the excess energy is given off as just energy, its called nuclear fission
Why is light deviated by gravity? Because it has a mass. If it has a mass, then there must be some ultra small particle (OP word, thanks marlo) that we haven't found yet. Hence energy has mass, and is made up of that very small particle.
|
Black tulip
Tribute to the the greatest of the great.
|
| |
|
The_Fry_Cook_of_Doom
|
Nov 11 2008, 11:58 AM
Post #34
|
:OOOOOOOOOOOOMAAANN
- Posts:
- 18,587
- Group:
- A414A Member
- Member
- #35
- Joined:
- January 11, 2008
|
- Hyperactive Jam
- Nov 10 2008, 04:16 PM
- Ultra-Musketeer
- Nov 10 2008, 07:31 AM
gooback, Jam, Redemption, you nerdy nubs are beginning to confuse me.
Then it is you who is the nub, and who's socks need a washing. Not because they're dirty I'd presume.
But no, if I take off my socks, then my feet would be cold ):
Forgive me, my knowledge is slightly higher than that of a grade 8 science student.
|
- Jam
-
It's okay to be mad at your fiends sometimes
|
| |
|
The_Fry_Cook_of_Doom
|
Nov 11 2008, 12:10 PM
Post #35
|
:OOOOOOOOOOOOMAAANN
- Posts:
- 18,587
- Group:
- A414A Member
- Member
- #35
- Joined:
- January 11, 2008
|
- Incognoto
- Nov 10 2008, 04:49 PM
- gooback
- Nov 10 2008, 02:01 AM
sorry to break up this friendly discussion, but you are all wrong (except for Jam, who truly is harnessing power from a nuclear holocaust) What you are experiencing is the energy inside of the nucleus. In a nucleus of say, uranium, there are 92 protons. Now think, protons are all positively charged, yet they are all so close together in the atom, so what keeps them together??? ENERGY, there is actually energy keeping a nucleus together, and when an atom is split, it requires less energy to hold the nucleus together, and the excess energy is given off as just energy, its called nuclear fission
Why is light deviated by gravity? Because it has a mass. If it has a mass, then there must be some ultra small particle (OP word, thanks marlo) that we haven't found yet. Hence energy has mass, and is made up of that very small particle.
Then maybe that's Dark Energy, and it's probably what we're trying to find through the atom smasher.
I was thinking; would it be possible to slow down light by making it pass through a place with way-below-freezing temperatures?
|
- Jam
-
It's okay to be mad at your fiends sometimes
|
| |
|
Incog
|
Nov 11 2008, 01:37 PM
Post #36
|
CHEERIO!
- Posts:
- 21,769
- Group:
- French
- Member
- #6
- Joined:
- December 13, 2007
|
- Ultra-Musketeer
- Nov 11 2008, 02:10 PM
- Incognoto
- Nov 10 2008, 04:49 PM
- gooback
- Nov 10 2008, 02:01 AM
sorry to break up this friendly discussion, but you are all wrong (except for Jam, who truly is harnessing power from a nuclear holocaust) What you are experiencing is the energy inside of the nucleus. In a nucleus of say, uranium, there are 92 protons. Now think, protons are all positively charged, yet they are all so close together in the atom, so what keeps them together??? ENERGY, there is actually energy keeping a nucleus together, and when an atom is split, it requires less energy to hold the nucleus together, and the excess energy is given off as just energy, its called nuclear fission
Why is light deviated by gravity? Because it has a mass. If it has a mass, then there must be some ultra small particle (OP word, thanks marlo) that we haven't found yet. Hence energy has mass, and is made up of that very small particle.
Then maybe that's Dark Energy, and it's probably what we're trying to find through the atom smasher. I was thinking; would it be possible to slow down light by making it pass through a place with way-below-freezing temperatures?
It may be possible... or not.
|
Black tulip
Tribute to the the greatest of the great.
|
| |
|
The_Fry_Cook_of_Doom
|
Nov 11 2008, 03:01 PM
Post #37
|
:OOOOOOOOOOOOMAAANN
- Posts:
- 18,587
- Group:
- A414A Member
- Member
- #35
- Joined:
- January 11, 2008
|
Ah ok.
|
- Jam
-
It's okay to be mad at your fiends sometimes
|
| |
|
gooback
|
Nov 12 2008, 01:15 AM
Post #38
|
Lieutenant
- Posts:
- 260
- Group:
- Member
- Member
- #133
- Joined:
- October 29, 2008
|
- Ultra-Musketeer
- Nov 11 2008, 12:10 PM
- Incognoto
- Nov 10 2008, 04:49 PM
- gooback
- Nov 10 2008, 02:01 AM
sorry to break up this friendly discussion, but you are all wrong (except for Jam, who truly is harnessing power from a nuclear holocaust) What you are experiencing is the energy inside of the nucleus. In a nucleus of say, uranium, there are 92 protons. Now think, protons are all positively charged, yet they are all so close together in the atom, so what keeps them together??? ENERGY, there is actually energy keeping a nucleus together, and when an atom is split, it requires less energy to hold the nucleus together, and the excess energy is given off as just energy, its called nuclear fission
Why is light deviated by gravity? Because it has a mass. If it has a mass, then there must be some ultra small particle (OP word, thanks marlo) that we haven't found yet. Hence energy has mass, and is made up of that very small particle.
Then maybe that's Dark Energy, and it's probably what we're trying to find through the atom smasher. I was thinking; would it be possible to slow down light by making it pass through a place with way-below-freezing temperatures?
yeah, light actually never reaches the speed of light unless in a vacuum, other particles slow it down, thats similar to why electricity will only travel around 0.7 times the speed of light in most wires. We (meaning human beings) have managed to make light stop, and in fact, researchrs have managed to make light go backwards, FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT!!! ZOMG
|
|
| |
|
MxDiane
|
Nov 12 2008, 03:50 AM
Post #39
|
Worteltjes World
- Posts:
- 10,700
- Group:
- Pegasus
- Member
- #3
- Joined:
- December 13, 2007
|
- MaxJ
- Nov 10 2008, 07:59 AM
- gooback
- Nov 10 2008, 01:40 AM
you would have to say "in the past tense, I used technically referring to..."
That's the past continuous I think hmmmm
hahaha grammar ; )
|
|
"He orders something unusual, like a Black Russian or a Tom Collins, and when you request a beer he says that surely a complex woman deserves a complex drink. " - Travis Grandt
|
| |
|
MaxJ
|
Nov 12 2008, 05:34 PM
Post #40
|
Wij van A414A adviseren A414A
- Posts:
- 9,339
- Group:
- Moderator
- Member
- #58
- Joined:
- April 21, 2008
|
- MxDiane
- Nov 12 2008, 04:50 AM
- MaxJ
- Nov 10 2008, 07:59 AM
- gooback
- Nov 10 2008, 01:40 AM
you would have to say "in the past tense, I used technically referring to..."
That's the past continuous I think hmmmm
hahaha grammar ; )
Tenses 
|
Jouw wereld, jouw A414A forum.
|
| |
|
MxDiane
|
Nov 12 2008, 06:59 PM
Post #41
|
Worteltjes World
- Posts:
- 10,700
- Group:
- Pegasus
- Member
- #3
- Joined:
- December 13, 2007
|
- MaxJ
- Nov 12 2008, 05:34 PM
- MxDiane
- Nov 12 2008, 04:50 AM
- MaxJ
- Nov 10 2008, 07:59 AM
- gooback
- Nov 10 2008, 01:40 AM
you would have to say "in the past tense, I used technically referring to..."
That's the past continuous I think hmmmm
hahaha grammar ; )
Tenses
;p
66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666
|
|
"He orders something unusual, like a Black Russian or a Tom Collins, and when you request a beer he says that surely a complex woman deserves a complex drink. " - Travis Grandt
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|
4:37 PM Jul 13