Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3
  • 7
The bats; under my eaves
Topic Started: Jul 25 2011, 07:52 PM (2,844 Views)
DragonLegend
Field Marshal
If an alien object were heading toward Earth, large enough to wipe out all life, I guarantee you dolphins and puppies wouldn't be the ones to stop it.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The_Fry_Cook_of_Doom
Member Avatar
:OOOOOOOOOOOOMAAANN
If life was to be annihilated, it would be for the better of it, to my belief; a blighted world such as this deserves no better than eradication, as it putrefies the serenity of existence.
Jam
 
It's okay to be mad at your fiends sometimes
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DragonLegend
Field Marshal
Why is it that self-hating humans always talk the talk but never walk the walk?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Vondongo
Member Avatar
Moo.
gs
Aug 10 2011, 04:00 AM
Goodsbee
Jul 31 2011, 01:19 PM
Ultra-Musketeer
Jul 30 2011, 06:32 PM
Not all vampires carry rabies; it's like saying all girls give you crabs.
loool, I didn't say vampires I said bats...never heard of a vampire with rabies lulz (andy)
you know what else carries rabies? dogs
Raccoons, too. But I bet Goodsbee loves her some coons.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The_Fry_Cook_of_Doom
Member Avatar
:OOOOOOOOOOOOMAAANN
DragonLegend
Aug 10 2011, 06:38 PM
Why is it that self-hating humans always talk the talk but never walk the walk?
I'm trying to please myself here :(
Jam
 
It's okay to be mad at your fiends sometimes
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
gs
Member Avatar
Slow down
DragonLegend
Aug 10 2011, 06:00 PM
If an alien object were heading toward Earth, large enough to wipe out all life, I guarantee you dolphins and puppies wouldn't be the ones to stop it.
nothing would stop it lol, and even if we could we would simply steal their technology and use it against each other. anyway, bad examples aside, it's not that i hate myself or humans in general, it's that i recognize the lack of respect many of us seem to have for the earth and its fragile eco systems, and how that can come to bite all life (including humans) in the ass.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DragonLegend
Field Marshal
gs
Aug 10 2011, 07:10 PM
DragonLegend
Aug 10 2011, 06:00 PM
If an alien object were heading toward Earth, large enough to wipe out all life, I guarantee you dolphins and puppies wouldn't be the ones to stop it.
nothing would stop it lol, and even if we could we would simply steal their technology and use it against each other. it's not that i hate myself or humans in general, it's that i recognize the lack of respect many of us seem to have for the earth and its fragile eco systems, and how that can come to bite all life (including humans) in the ass.
Alien object, not alien beings. As in, an asteroid or some such.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid-impact_avoidance

Respect is earned. The planet is not worthy of respect per se. The only reason to protect the planet is for the benefit of mankind.
Edited by DragonLegend, Aug 10 2011, 07:19 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
gs
Member Avatar
Slow down
i remember reading something about that. about how an asteroid like that would in all likelihood completely surprise us because we have no way of detecting it quickly enough without someone getting very lucky with a telescope, and even if we could see it coming there would be no way to stop it.

anyway, of course the only reason to respect the planet is to protect ourselves but protecting ourselves means protecting other life because we rely on it, more heavily than you might think. a planet doesn't have to earn respect, it needs to be respected because otherwise we can't guarantee it will be maintained in a way that is for us habitable.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DragonLegend
Field Marshal
gs
Aug 10 2011, 07:26 PM
i remember reading something about that. about how an asteroid like that would in all likelihood completely surprise us because we have no way of detecting it quickly enough without someone getting very lucky with a telescope, and even if we could see it coming there would be no way to stop it.

anyway, of course the only reason to respect the planet is to protect ourselves but protecting ourselves means protecting other life because we rely on it, more heavily than you might think. a planet doesn't have to earn respect, it needs to be respected because otherwise we can't guarantee it will be maintained in a way that is for us habitable.
Read the Wiki article. "Government mandates", and "Ongoing projects."

Regardless, human beings are the only ones with at least a chance at stopping something like this.

Quote:
 
anyway, of course the only reason to respect the planet is to protect ourselves but protecting ourselves means protecting other life because we rely on it, more heavily than you might think. a planet doesn't have to earn respect, it needs to be respected because otherwise we can't guarantee it will be maintained in a way that is for us habitable.


I don't think many people are against that. What people are against is making protection of the environment a priority over the benefit of mankind. For example, opposition to animal testing.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
gs
Member Avatar
Slow down
i'm not talking about PETA here (and am insulted you would even think that), everyone knows peta is just a bunch of little girls who can't handle reality. i'm talking about global warming, destroying rain forests & coral reefs, eliminating entire species because they taste good, etcetera. basically anything humans do without recognizing the long term negative effects.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jam
Member Avatar
Fruit Based Jam
DragonLegend
Aug 10 2011, 06:00 PM
If an alien object were heading toward Earth, large enough to wipe out all life, I guarantee you dolphins and puppies wouldn't be the ones to stop it.
I'm sure if they all focused their sonar onto a single area they could divert an asteroid.
Long live Carolus
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DragonLegend
Field Marshal
gs
Aug 10 2011, 08:04 PM
i'm not talking about PETA here (and am insulted you would even think that), everyone knows peta is just a bunch of little girls who can't handle reality. i'm talking about global warming, destroying rain forests & coral reefs, eliminating entire species because they taste good, etcetera. basically anything humans do without recognizing the long term negative effects.
Most of those problems aren't even real. But that's not the point. Let's assume anthropogenic global warming is real. Let me ask you, what's your solution?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
gs
Member Avatar
Slow down
my solution is not using hairspray, deodorant spray or airconditioning or anything else that emits CFCs. but that's just me, which is exactly the problem. no one can solve this on their own. carelessness but mostly ignorance is making people persist in using products that are harmful to the earths atmosphere
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DragonLegend
Field Marshal
gs
Aug 11 2011, 07:39 PM
my solution is not using hairspray, deodorant spray or airconditioning. but that's just me, which is exactly the problem. no one can solve this on their own. carelessness but mostly ignorance is making people persist in using products that are harmful to the earths atmosphere
I meant a solution for humans in general, not individuals.

The correct answer is capping emissions. That hurts the economy, and it hurts mankind in general. In other words, it's no different than opposition to animal testing. You're prioritizing the environment over human beings.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
gs
Member Avatar
Slow down
not even close to comparable. the atmosphere is vital for the future of man kind. animals that are being used for testing aren't, and even if they were they're not testing on animals close to extinction anyway
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DragonLegend
Field Marshal
But there's no proof it's real... You want to cripple the economy based on the possibility that maybe an unproven and debunked claim is maybe, somehow, true. Meanwhile, millions of people suffer. That's radical environmentalism.

And animal testing is most definitely necessary... It's extremely useful in scientific research, drug tests, and the like.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Vondongo
Member Avatar
Moo.
I preferred when this was a light-hearted vermin discussion instead of political/ideological discussion #58953. Move the serious stuff somewhere else?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
gs
Member Avatar
Slow down
DragonLegend
Aug 11 2011, 08:31 PM
But there's no proof it's real... You want to cripple the economy based on the possibility that maybe an unproven and debunked claim is maybe, somehow, true. Meanwhile, millions of people suffer. That's radical environmentalism.

And animal testing is most definitely necessary... It's extremely useful in scientific research, drug tests, and the like.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion

and i never said i was against animal testing. why do you keep assuming i am?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Big Richard
Member Avatar
Gay People Read This.
"i'm talking about global warming, destroying rain forests & coral reefs, eliminating entire species because they taste good"

how are most of those not real? I guess the further right you go on the political spectrum the dumber you get
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DragonLegend
Field Marshal
gs
Aug 11 2011, 08:53 PM
DragonLegend
Aug 11 2011, 08:31 PM
But there's no proof it's real... You want to cripple the economy based on the possibility that maybe an unproven and debunked claim is maybe, somehow, true. Meanwhile, millions of people suffer. That's radical environmentalism.

And animal testing is most definitely necessary... It's extremely useful in scientific research, drug tests, and the like.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion

and i never said i was against animal testing. why do you keep assuming i am?
Ozone depletion due to CFCs was a scam as well.

I know you said you're not against animal testing, but then you said animal testing isn't necessary.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Vondongo
Member Avatar
Moo.
-__________-
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DragonLegend
Field Marshal
Big Richard
Aug 11 2011, 09:59 PM
"i'm talking about global warming, destroying rain forests & coral reefs, eliminating entire species because they taste good"

how are most of those not real? I guess the further right you go on the political spectrum the dumber you get
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jam
Member Avatar
Fruit Based Jam
He just said it wasn't vital. :D
Long live Carolus
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The_Fry_Cook_of_Doom
Member Avatar
:OOOOOOOOOOOOMAAANN
Redemption
Aug 12 2011, 12:31 AM
-__________-
Dragon did it *Points at Dragon*
Jam
 
It's okay to be mad at your fiends sometimes
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Incog
Member Avatar
CHEERIO!

gs
Aug 10 2011, 08:04 PM
i'm not talking about PETA here (and am insulted you would even think that), everyone knows peta is just a bunch of little girls who can't handle reality. i'm talking about global warming, destroying rain forests & coral reefs, eliminating entire species because they taste good, etcetera. basically anything humans do without recognizing the long term negative effects.
in this case humans are no better than animals, literally. a few good ecosystems have been destroyed by introduced species. it's just that humans are doing damage on a more wide-scale scope. it would be unnatural to try to solve this, yet it remains the path to take, simply because humans are a bit more intelligent beings than the rest of nature. unfortunate, but it's the reality of thing.

dragon's reaction to the solution of NOT trying to control the damage being done to the world is a perfectly natural one. like rabbits in Australia (i've got to find a relevant article to back me up with this example), or bacteria on a petri, people are consuming resources and expanding like crazy, without the slightest intelligence of being able to predict how it's going to end when resources and space run out. in this regard, we're quite as stupid and ignorant as a rabbit, except we're much less fluffier and don't have the excuse of not being aware of the damage we do. humans DO know the extent of their damage, but in their uncontrolled greed they ignore precaution, spin atrocious lies and hope that they won't have to suffer the consequences of their actions, laughing as they do at the absolutely hilarious idea that it's possible to change how they live so as to not be as retarded as an amoebae. dragon's a perfect example of this.

one way or another, humanity isn't stronger than all of nature itself. humans still have natural origins and natural instincts, and if we don't fix the problem we're creating, mother nature will do it for us, directly or indirectly. i think we might nuke ourselves but i'm hoping we do it with conventional methods.
Black tulip

Tribute to the the greatest of the great.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
The_Fry_Cook_of_Doom
Member Avatar
:OOOOOOOOOOOOMAAANN
We'll live just fine in a world without rain forests, coral reefs, glaciers or an availability of natural resources. We'll just depend on recycled materials and solar energy. It's pretty easy, really; I don't understand the need for making an issue out of the matter, when human interests have never truly been at an excessive intensity of libration sufficient to merit so much of a concern.
Jam
 
It's okay to be mad at your fiends sometimes
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Big Richard
Member Avatar
Gay People Read This.
lol to quote George Carlin

"Are we so much better than chickens all of a sudden? When did this happen that we passed chickens in goodness?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvF1Q3UidWM
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DragonLegend
Field Marshal
Hyperactive Jam
Aug 12 2011, 02:35 AM
He just said it wasn't vital. :D
What does vital mean? Water every day and food every few days?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DragonLegend
Field Marshal
Incog
Aug 12 2011, 07:38 AM
gs
Aug 10 2011, 08:04 PM
i'm not talking about PETA here (and am insulted you would even think that), everyone knows peta is just a bunch of little girls who can't handle reality. i'm talking about global warming, destroying rain forests & coral reefs, eliminating entire species because they taste good, etcetera. basically anything humans do without recognizing the long term negative effects.
in this case humans are no better than animals, literally. a few good ecosystems have been destroyed by introduced species. it's just that humans are doing damage on a more wide-scale scope. it would be unnatural to try to solve this, yet it remains the path to take, simply because humans are a bit more intelligent beings than the rest of nature. unfortunate, but it's the reality of thing.

dragon's reaction to the solution of NOT trying to control the damage being done to the world is a perfectly natural one. like rabbits in Australia (i've got to find a relevant article to back me up with this example), or bacteria on a petri, people are consuming resources and expanding like crazy, without the slightest intelligence of being able to predict how it's going to end when resources and space run out. in this regard, we're quite as stupid and ignorant as a rabbit, except we're much less fluffier and don't have the excuse of not being aware of the damage we do. humans DO know the extent of their damage, but in their uncontrolled greed they ignore precaution, spin atrocious lies and hope that they won't have to suffer the consequences of their actions, laughing as they do at the absolutely hilarious idea that it's possible to change how they live so as to not be as retarded as an amoebae. dragon's a perfect example of this.

one way or another, humanity isn't stronger than all of nature itself. humans still have natural origins and natural instincts, and if we don't fix the problem we're creating, mother nature will do it for us, directly or indirectly. i think we might nuke ourselves but i'm hoping we do it with conventional methods.
You say you're an irreligious atheist, and you oppose Christianity and other religions, but you seem to be a devout worshiper of Gaia. Reminds me of an article I once read: http://www.city-journal.org/2010/20_2_liberal-enthusiam.html

Quote:
 
There’s also a close resemblance between the environmental and biblical views of history, as the late novelist Michael Crichton pointed out in a widely reprinted speech. “Environmentalism is in fact a perfect twenty-first-century remapping of traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs and myths,” Crichton said. “There’s an initial Eden, a paradise, a state of grace and unity with nature, there’s a fall from grace into a state of pollution as a result of eating from the tree of knowledge, and as a result of our actions there is a judgment day coming for us all.” That judgment day currently assumes the form of various global-warming disasters that will happen unless we immediately perform still more rituals. Never mind that the science so urgently instructing us to reduce carbon emissions—thus hobbling economic growth and prosperity around the world—is so young, and so poorly understood, that it can’t explain why global warming seems to have stalled over the last decade. Far more persuasive is the argument from faith: we’d better repent, because the End is nigh.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
gs
Member Avatar
Slow down
DragonLegend
Aug 12 2011, 12:22 AM
gs
Aug 11 2011, 08:53 PM
DragonLegend
Aug 11 2011, 08:31 PM
But there's no proof it's real... You want to cripple the economy based on the possibility that maybe an unproven and debunked claim is maybe, somehow, true. Meanwhile, millions of people suffer. That's radical environmentalism.

And animal testing is most definitely necessary... It's extremely useful in scientific research, drug tests, and the like.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion

and i never said i was against animal testing. why do you keep assuming i am?
Ozone depletion due to CFCs was a scam as well.

I know you said you're not against animal testing, but then you said animal testing isn't necessary.
that's your argument? that it's a scam? at the very least back up your statement. a lot of people are in denial about this, including some scientists whose articles you might consider 'proof', but the facts remain. it's simple chemistry, as simple as it gets really. read the technical parts of the wiki page and tell me which part is incorrect. oh also read the "misconceptions about ozone depletion" part maybe that will clear it up for you.

also i never said animal testing isn't necessary. i also didn't say it isn't vital. what i said was that animals that are being used for testing aren't vital to humanity's future unlike the atmosphere.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · General chat · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3
  • 7

Skinning by GS, Logo and bottom by Incog.