

| The bats; under my eaves | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 25 2011, 07:52 PM (2,844 Views) | |
| DragonLegend | Aug 10 2011, 06:00 PM Post #61 |
|
Field Marshal
|
If an alien object were heading toward Earth, large enough to wipe out all life, I guarantee you dolphins and puppies wouldn't be the ones to stop it. |
![]() |
|
| The_Fry_Cook_of_Doom | Aug 10 2011, 06:19 PM Post #62 |
|
:OOOOOOOOOOOOMAAANN
|
If life was to be annihilated, it would be for the better of it, to my belief; a blighted world such as this deserves no better than eradication, as it putrefies the serenity of existence. |
| |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 10 2011, 06:38 PM Post #63 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Why is it that self-hating humans always talk the talk but never walk the walk? |
![]() |
|
| Vondongo | Aug 10 2011, 06:50 PM Post #64 |
![]()
Moo.
|
Raccoons, too. But I bet Goodsbee loves her some coons. |
![]() |
|
| The_Fry_Cook_of_Doom | Aug 10 2011, 07:02 PM Post #65 |
|
:OOOOOOOOOOOOMAAANN
|
I'm trying to please myself here
|
| |
![]() |
|
| gs | Aug 10 2011, 07:10 PM Post #66 |
![]()
Slow down
|
nothing would stop it lol, and even if we could we would simply steal their technology and use it against each other. anyway, bad examples aside, it's not that i hate myself or humans in general, it's that i recognize the lack of respect many of us seem to have for the earth and its fragile eco systems, and how that can come to bite all life (including humans) in the ass. |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 10 2011, 07:17 PM Post #67 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Alien object, not alien beings. As in, an asteroid or some such. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid-impact_avoidance Respect is earned. The planet is not worthy of respect per se. The only reason to protect the planet is for the benefit of mankind. Edited by DragonLegend, Aug 10 2011, 07:19 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| gs | Aug 10 2011, 07:26 PM Post #68 |
![]()
Slow down
|
i remember reading something about that. about how an asteroid like that would in all likelihood completely surprise us because we have no way of detecting it quickly enough without someone getting very lucky with a telescope, and even if we could see it coming there would be no way to stop it. anyway, of course the only reason to respect the planet is to protect ourselves but protecting ourselves means protecting other life because we rely on it, more heavily than you might think. a planet doesn't have to earn respect, it needs to be respected because otherwise we can't guarantee it will be maintained in a way that is for us habitable. |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 10 2011, 07:43 PM Post #69 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Read the Wiki article. "Government mandates", and "Ongoing projects." Regardless, human beings are the only ones with at least a chance at stopping something like this.
I don't think many people are against that. What people are against is making protection of the environment a priority over the benefit of mankind. For example, opposition to animal testing. |
![]() |
|
| gs | Aug 10 2011, 08:04 PM Post #70 |
![]()
Slow down
|
i'm not talking about PETA here (and am insulted you would even think that), everyone knows peta is just a bunch of little girls who can't handle reality. i'm talking about global warming, destroying rain forests & coral reefs, eliminating entire species because they taste good, etcetera. basically anything humans do without recognizing the long term negative effects. |
![]() |
|
| Jam | Aug 11 2011, 12:52 AM Post #71 |
![]()
Fruit Based Jam
|
I'm sure if they all focused their sonar onto a single area they could divert an asteroid. |
| Long live Carolus | |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 11 2011, 07:28 PM Post #72 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Most of those problems aren't even real. But that's not the point. Let's assume anthropogenic global warming is real. Let me ask you, what's your solution? |
![]() |
|
| gs | Aug 11 2011, 07:39 PM Post #73 |
![]()
Slow down
|
my solution is not using hairspray, deodorant spray or airconditioning or anything else that emits CFCs. but that's just me, which is exactly the problem. no one can solve this on their own. carelessness but mostly ignorance is making people persist in using products that are harmful to the earths atmosphere |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 11 2011, 07:44 PM Post #74 |
|
Field Marshal
|
I meant a solution for humans in general, not individuals. The correct answer is capping emissions. That hurts the economy, and it hurts mankind in general. In other words, it's no different than opposition to animal testing. You're prioritizing the environment over human beings. |
![]() |
|
| gs | Aug 11 2011, 07:51 PM Post #75 |
![]()
Slow down
|
not even close to comparable. the atmosphere is vital for the future of man kind. animals that are being used for testing aren't, and even if they were they're not testing on animals close to extinction anyway |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 11 2011, 08:31 PM Post #76 |
|
Field Marshal
|
But there's no proof it's real... You want to cripple the economy based on the possibility that maybe an unproven and debunked claim is maybe, somehow, true. Meanwhile, millions of people suffer. That's radical environmentalism. And animal testing is most definitely necessary... It's extremely useful in scientific research, drug tests, and the like. |
![]() |
|
| Vondongo | Aug 11 2011, 08:40 PM Post #77 |
![]()
Moo.
|
I preferred when this was a light-hearted vermin discussion instead of political/ideological discussion #58953. Move the serious stuff somewhere else? |
![]() |
|
| gs | Aug 11 2011, 08:53 PM Post #78 |
![]()
Slow down
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion and i never said i was against animal testing. why do you keep assuming i am? |
![]() |
|
| Big Richard | Aug 11 2011, 09:59 PM Post #79 |
|
Gay People Read This.
|
"i'm talking about global warming, destroying rain forests & coral reefs, eliminating entire species because they taste good" how are most of those not real? I guess the further right you go on the political spectrum the dumber you get |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 12 2011, 12:22 AM Post #80 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Ozone depletion due to CFCs was a scam as well. I know you said you're not against animal testing, but then you said animal testing isn't necessary. |
![]() |
|
| Vondongo | Aug 12 2011, 12:31 AM Post #81 |
![]()
Moo.
|
-__________- |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 12 2011, 12:31 AM Post #82 |
|
Field Marshal
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Jam | Aug 12 2011, 02:35 AM Post #83 |
![]()
Fruit Based Jam
|
He just said it wasn't vital. :D |
| Long live Carolus | |
![]() |
|
| The_Fry_Cook_of_Doom | Aug 12 2011, 06:06 AM Post #84 |
|
:OOOOOOOOOOOOMAAANN
|
Dragon did it *Points at Dragon* |
| |
![]() |
|
| Incog | Aug 12 2011, 07:38 AM Post #85 |
|
CHEERIO!
![]()
|
in this case humans are no better than animals, literally. a few good ecosystems have been destroyed by introduced species. it's just that humans are doing damage on a more wide-scale scope. it would be unnatural to try to solve this, yet it remains the path to take, simply because humans are a bit more intelligent beings than the rest of nature. unfortunate, but it's the reality of thing. dragon's reaction to the solution of NOT trying to control the damage being done to the world is a perfectly natural one. like rabbits in Australia (i've got to find a relevant article to back me up with this example), or bacteria on a petri, people are consuming resources and expanding like crazy, without the slightest intelligence of being able to predict how it's going to end when resources and space run out. in this regard, we're quite as stupid and ignorant as a rabbit, except we're much less fluffier and don't have the excuse of not being aware of the damage we do. humans DO know the extent of their damage, but in their uncontrolled greed they ignore precaution, spin atrocious lies and hope that they won't have to suffer the consequences of their actions, laughing as they do at the absolutely hilarious idea that it's possible to change how they live so as to not be as retarded as an amoebae. dragon's a perfect example of this. one way or another, humanity isn't stronger than all of nature itself. humans still have natural origins and natural instincts, and if we don't fix the problem we're creating, mother nature will do it for us, directly or indirectly. i think we might nuke ourselves but i'm hoping we do it with conventional methods. |
|
Black tulip Tribute to the the greatest of the great. | |
![]() |
|
| The_Fry_Cook_of_Doom | Aug 12 2011, 07:52 AM Post #86 |
|
:OOOOOOOOOOOOMAAANN
|
We'll live just fine in a world without rain forests, coral reefs, glaciers or an availability of natural resources. We'll just depend on recycled materials and solar energy. It's pretty easy, really; I don't understand the need for making an issue out of the matter, when human interests have never truly been at an excessive intensity of libration sufficient to merit so much of a concern. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Big Richard | Aug 12 2011, 08:10 AM Post #87 |
|
Gay People Read This.
|
lol to quote George Carlin "Are we so much better than chickens all of a sudden? When did this happen that we passed chickens in goodness?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvF1Q3UidWM |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 12 2011, 08:17 AM Post #88 |
|
Field Marshal
|
What does vital mean? Water every day and food every few days? |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 12 2011, 08:28 AM Post #89 |
|
Field Marshal
|
You say you're an irreligious atheist, and you oppose Christianity and other religions, but you seem to be a devout worshiper of Gaia. Reminds me of an article I once read: http://www.city-journal.org/2010/20_2_liberal-enthusiam.html
|
![]() |
|
| gs | Aug 12 2011, 09:11 AM Post #90 |
![]()
Slow down
|
that's your argument? that it's a scam? at the very least back up your statement. a lot of people are in denial about this, including some scientists whose articles you might consider 'proof', but the facts remain. it's simple chemistry, as simple as it gets really. read the technical parts of the wiki page and tell me which part is incorrect. oh also read the "misconceptions about ozone depletion" part maybe that will clear it up for you. also i never said animal testing isn't necessary. i also didn't say it isn't vital. what i said was that animals that are being used for testing aren't vital to humanity's future unlike the atmosphere. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Our users say it best: "Zetaboards is the best forum service I have ever used." Learn More · Sign-up for Free |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General chat · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
4:40 PM Jul 13
|












4:40 PM Jul 13