

| incog | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Aug 13 2011, 02:59 AM (3,640 Views) | |
| Big Richard | Aug 13 2011, 02:59 AM Post #1 |
|
Gay People Read This.
|
if I ever visit france next year (with a friend of mine possibly) would you take us in for a little and give us a tour in a plane? Lol
|
![]() |
|
| Big Richard | Aug 13 2011, 03:04 AM Post #2 |
|
Gay People Read This.
|
i promise i wont rape you... (maybe she will) |
![]() |
|
| The_Fry_Cook_of_Doom | Aug 13 2011, 06:16 AM Post #3 |
|
:OOOOOOOOOOOOMAAANN
|
Incog just contacted me on his cell phone and told me that he agrees. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Incog | Aug 13 2011, 07:45 AM Post #4 |
|
CHEERIO!
![]()
|
we probably couldn't take you guys in considering my parents barely have the patience to let my cousin and some friends of his stay over, much less 2 people they've never ever heard of in their life. that said, a small flight is possible i suppose. you'd have to get to the aerodrome by yourselves but if you can meet up there there's really no problem at all. i'll have to at least tell you where it is though, its' 40km east from paris about, maybe 30 to 40 minutes by train |
|
Black tulip Tribute to the the greatest of the great. | |
![]() |
|
| Big Richard | Aug 13 2011, 04:46 PM Post #5 |
|
Gay People Read This.
|
ok nice we'll talk more about it as we plan it out further like exact directions and what not. we're thinking about a full blown euro trip traveling around so any tips on places to visit would be nice |
![]() |
|
| gs | Aug 13 2011, 04:50 PM Post #6 |
![]()
Slow down
|
amsterdam > paris |
![]() |
|
| Big Richard | Aug 13 2011, 05:29 PM Post #7 |
|
Gay People Read This.
|
hows the marijuana? lol |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 13 2011, 05:33 PM Post #8 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Illegal. |
![]() |
|
| gs | Aug 13 2011, 06:06 PM Post #9 |
![]()
Slow down
|
best in the world well not in amsterdam in particular (i'd imagine it's worse in amsterdam because tourists are more easily satisfied) but here in NL definitely. because bad stuff just doesn't get sold unlike in the US where you can sell anything. people are dying for it there because there aren't 30 coffeeshops in every city where you can buy it legally. |
![]() |
|
| Big Richard | Aug 13 2011, 06:25 PM Post #10 |
|
Gay People Read This.
|
awesome I wouldn't have any idea where to go though is there any english signs or something haha you should show us around |
![]() |
|
| gs | Aug 13 2011, 06:33 PM Post #11 |
![]()
Slow down
|
lol i don't know anything about amsterdam either tbh but wherever it says coffeeshop you're good. and get a pipe so you can smoke pure. |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 13 2011, 06:39 PM Post #12 |
|
Field Marshal
|
It's illegal for tourists. It's a new policy. |
![]() |
|
| gs | Aug 13 2011, 06:49 PM Post #13 |
![]()
Slow down
|
oh right i forgot about that get yourself a dutch girl then |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 13 2011, 06:55 PM Post #14 |
|
Field Marshal
|
I don't think Richard is into prostitutes. |
![]() |
|
| Jam | Aug 13 2011, 06:57 PM Post #15 |
![]()
Fruit Based Jam
|
Not yet. |
| Long live Carolus | |
![]() |
|
| The_Fry_Cook_of_Doom | Aug 13 2011, 07:01 PM Post #16 |
|
:OOOOOOOOOOOOMAAANN
|
Who said anything about prostitutes? Civilized escorts are eminently plausible as, "Girls." |
| |
![]() |
|
| MaxJ | Aug 13 2011, 07:02 PM Post #17 |
|
Wij van A414A adviseren A414A
|
They are Turkish/Russian/Thai/Brazilian but not Dutch ![]() I don't think the new law is already in affect for the coffee shops. Otherwise you should stop in Rotterdam or Breda(if you would come from Paris by train) for some weed, they are probably not so strict there if you pretend to be Dutch. For language you shouldn't be afraid, you can always ask for the road and in touristic places they will even talk to you in English(it happened to me twice last monday when I was in Amsterdam). But you shouldn't make it yourself too easy, it's a lot more fun to find your way yourself without doing everything in English! |
|
Jouw wereld, jouw A414A forum. | |
![]() |
|
| Big Richard | Aug 13 2011, 11:29 PM Post #18 |
|
Gay People Read This.
|
haha yeah but dutch is a hard language to learn and damnit why the hell is illegal for tourists? fuck that gs just buy me some and I'll buy it off you lol |
![]() |
|
| Vondongo | Aug 13 2011, 11:37 PM Post #19 |
![]()
Moo.
|
Because so much tourism there is literally just for the weed. |
![]() |
|
| Big Richard | Aug 13 2011, 11:40 PM Post #20 |
|
Gay People Read This.
|
they should embrace that |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 14 2011, 12:57 AM Post #21 |
|
Field Marshal
|
I think the official reason was because of drug trafficking.
Edited by DragonLegend, Aug 14 2011, 12:57 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Vondongo | Aug 14 2011, 01:10 AM Post #22 |
![]()
Moo.
|
If you deal in something that is illicit elsewhere, you get smugglers and traffickers from abroad, and that means crime related to smuggling and trafficking is at your doorstep. Were the pot legal in other countries, smuggling would cease to be a serious problem and smugglers and traffickers would be on the streets. Gang-related crime would probably die if drugs became legal, because they would no longer have any reason to exist. With legal drugs, what do they do? Parade around and extort people? That doesn't pay the bills anymore. |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 14 2011, 01:30 AM Post #23 |
|
Field Marshal
|
Isn't pot still illegal in the Netherlands? I think they just decriminalized it. |
![]() |
|
| Big Richard | Aug 14 2011, 03:45 AM Post #24 |
|
Gay People Read This.
|
whats the difference? and all the more reason to legalize marijuana |
![]() |
|
| Vondongo | Aug 14 2011, 03:52 AM Post #25 |
![]()
Moo.
|
Yeah I agree. I'd rather agribusinesses spearhead production of it. Drug cartels and shady growers wouldn't be in any condition to compete and would be run out of business by cheap, mass-produced weed. Eventually the industrial growers would turn to lower grades, gradually reducing the potency of the drug to levels akin to the 1960's and 70's. Which is why I have no idea why the anti-drug people are anti-drug at all. Once drugs are no longer underground and get mass-produced, they themselves will become less dangerous, and all the types who deal with illicit drugs will have no way to make any money. Drug violence = dead and most organized crime (especially in the US) will shutter because it won't be profitable anymore. |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 14 2011, 04:02 AM Post #26 |
|
Field Marshal
|
It means it's not a crime, but it's still not allowed under the law. I believe the government simply tolerates it there, much like how the US federal government [mostly] tolerates states legalizing marijuana for medical use even though it's still illegal under US law. |
![]() |
|
| Big Richard | Aug 14 2011, 04:02 AM Post #27 |
|
Gay People Read This.
|
not to mention something like 1 in 3 federal inmates are there solely for marijuana related drug crimes. anyway if you agree with that then vote Ron Paul at the very least the only candidate that is smart enough to realize the "war on drugs" is a joke. |
![]() |
|
| Big Richard | Aug 14 2011, 04:03 AM Post #28 |
|
Gay People Read This.
|
thats so contradictory lol and also I think the US just passed a law that makes it so the gov. can't interfere with drug legalization in states so it doesn't matter. So the ATF agents can stop raiding bud shops in california. |
![]() |
|
| DragonLegend | Aug 14 2011, 04:21 AM Post #29 |
|
Field Marshal
|
It means that even though marijuana is illegal, authorities won't do much or even anything to you, or there will simply be a civil penalty rather criminal charges. It's different in each state. The highest figure I've come across for the percentage of people serving time for marijuana possession is 12%. Figures range from under 1% to 12%, depending on the source. What law are you talking about? The SCOTUS ruled a few years ago in Gonzales v. Raich that the federal ban on marijuana (including for medical use) is a-okay, and the feds can prosecute people for violating the ban, regardless of state law. Edited by DragonLegend, Aug 14 2011, 04:22 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Vondongo | Aug 14 2011, 04:34 AM Post #30 |
![]()
Moo.
|
That potency thing I mentioned? Prohibition is a fantastic case study on the war on drugs and this is no exception. A lot of alcohol that was produced was mildly toxic and a lot of times pretty filthy, because there were no standards and no oversight, because nobody could make quality, legal alcohol. If anyone made anything, it would be bad. Same goes for the drugs in existence today (chem lab ecstasy or marijuana are both great examples) that are produced, transported and distributed in sub-par conditions and pose threats to the user that are aside from the normal chemical effects. Legalize them so drug and agricultural companies can produce them. And you know full well if the government did this, safety standards would be everywhere. And the big companies are too big to get that crap past the radar. Cheap, clean drugs would go on sale and the people who want them would start buying. It'd be like moving a Chipotle restaurant into a neighborhood where its only competition would be overpriced taco stands that fear the health inspector. Or like how sites like Stubhub have raped scalping of its ability to extort. Someone's going to suffer, badly. And fortunately, it won't be the customer either. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today. Learn More · Sign-up for Free |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General chat · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
4:39 PM Jul 13
|












4:39 PM Jul 13