| Amendment Proposal- Abolishing the Courts; A self repealing amendment to temporarily abolish the court system in favor a tribunal | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jan 5 2018, 10:11 AM (196 Views) | |
| Momo | Jan 5 2018, 10:11 AM Post #1 |
|
Da Party
|
The amendment in progress can be found here: Amendment Proposal. I fully expect this amendment to be the most controversial amendment I have written to date, for any region I have ever resided in. This is not only largely changing the Conch Code, but rather completely removing an entire tier and abolishing 6 positions (three of which are currently unfilled). I encourage the opinions and concerns of both sides be posted here for civilized discussion. I'm going to once again say, this is a temporary, self-repealing amendment |
|
The Party, Long retired President of Conch Kingdom Head of TOP, Proud member of the Democratic Union of Conch Kingdom No political party will ever be nearly as good as DUCK, for obvious reasons | |
![]() |
|
| Jalaron Advaria | Jan 13 2018, 09:20 PM Post #2 |
|
It does seem that the Justice System is quite a burden. I would approve this amendment. |
![]() |
|
| Momo | Jan 13 2018, 10:16 PM Post #3 |
|
Da Party
|
This amendment has been changed to permanently dissolve the courts in their entirety |
|
The Party, Long retired President of Conch Kingdom Head of TOP, Proud member of the Democratic Union of Conch Kingdom No political party will ever be nearly as good as DUCK, for obvious reasons | |
![]() |
|
| New Jaedonstan | Jan 14 2018, 01:25 PM Post #4 |
|
Prince of Spies
|
Wait, I thought we were just doing temporary? |
| -Official Communication of New Jaedonstan | |
![]() |
|
| Momo | Jan 14 2018, 01:37 PM Post #5 |
|
Da Party
|
The amendment was changed at the request of Tulov and Balan Bar |
|
The Party, Long retired President of Conch Kingdom Head of TOP, Proud member of the Democratic Union of Conch Kingdom No political party will ever be nearly as good as DUCK, for obvious reasons | |
![]() |
|
| New Jaedonstan | Jan 14 2018, 01:54 PM Post #6 |
|
Prince of Spies
|
I see...... Why just the MoDA? Why not all dept. heads? That makes more sense than handing just one person all of the judicial power. Edited by New Jaedonstan, Jan 14 2018, 01:55 PM.
|
| -Official Communication of New Jaedonstan | |
![]() |
|
| Momo | Jan 14 2018, 04:38 PM Post #7 |
|
Da Party
|
Because it remains the MoDA's job to oversee domestic affairs. The other officials have their own things to do. I'm not saying only the MoDA can act on crime. I'm saying that if a question arises about legality issues, the MoDA is responsible for knowing the answer. |
|
The Party, Long retired President of Conch Kingdom Head of TOP, Proud member of the Democratic Union of Conch Kingdom No political party will ever be nearly as good as DUCK, for obvious reasons | |
![]() |
|
| New Jaedonstan | Jan 14 2018, 06:26 PM Post #8 |
|
Prince of Spies
|
Sure, but having one person interpret is unsafe. I think having all dept heads would be wiser. |
| -Official Communication of New Jaedonstan | |
![]() |
|
| Momo | Jan 14 2018, 08:49 PM Post #9 |
|
Da Party
|
I think not, because if one person is coming up to question it, why make them wait on a bunch of people agreeing. Bureaucracy slows the system. Which is why we are removing the courts in the first place |
|
The Party, Long retired President of Conch Kingdom Head of TOP, Proud member of the Democratic Union of Conch Kingdom No political party will ever be nearly as good as DUCK, for obvious reasons | |
![]() |
|
| New Jaedonstan | Jan 15 2018, 07:12 AM Post #10 |
|
Prince of Spies
|
Yeah, but no safeguards are equally as bad. Sometimes people need other people to question their decisions and create checks+balances. What you propose gives far too much power to one person when it needs to be split up among several people. That's why in the US we have 9 justices on the supreme court and why we had 3 justices here. I think it would be wise to expand that power of interpretation among a few other existing officials. |
| -Official Communication of New Jaedonstan | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Regional Discussion · Next Topic » |





5:17 PM Jul 10