| Day 2 - Morning Sickness | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 1 2016, 12:34 AM (4,896 Views) | |
| Merry | Oct 1 2016, 02:13 AM Post #31 |
|
Honestly, I don'tknow what to make of Ohm and his very confident knowledge of a 3rd Party. What I do know is that if there was a silencer item/ability used amongst us it either came from a Mafioso or a 3rd Party. If Ohm is right and there's only one 3rd Party member as he said here. http://s15.zetaboards.com/Dungeon_Crawl_Mafia/single/?p=10003156&t=10027684 Then with Salome's death the 3rd Party is dead and the silencing issue is moot assuming it was Salome who did it. If Ohm is wrong and there are other non-Mafia/non-Townie aligned parties out there then the silencing issue might still be a problem if it can be used more than once which it probably can be. Or, most frightening of all, the Mafia have a silencing ability they can use during the Day and, again, it can probably be used more than once. |
![]() |
|
| Inazuma | Oct 1 2016, 02:15 AM Post #32 |
![]()
|
I can slightly see your perspective, but you were one of the lone few who insisted on it. Some people entertained it, then shrugged it off, but you and Nero specifically (and possibly another. I'll need to go back and reread completely tonight) pushed it as the only viable option for town. That doesn't sit well with me. It paints you and Nero, as I said, as people who want to permanently shut somebody up before full answers can be given. So please, explain how my flip could've helped you at all. No matter the flip, you couldn't have confirmed the existence of the item since any role could have it.
If you think having the paraphrased message and time details is "no additional information", I may have to question what standard you have for information. I posted 46-47 words yesterday (was very careful with the numbers). I posted what was happening to me, and what it stopped me from doing. I admit that I'm bad at condensing paragraphs, but the amount of information you are asking for up there just wasn't viable. I certainly wasn't going to put down a vote. I was in no mood to be punished by the mods for going against the rules of the silencer. I didn't really plan for it to be vague, but I was certainly glad afterwards. It wasn't my fault I was silenced, and it almost got me lynched because of some insisters. I suppose the vagueness helped me survive to day 2, since the majority didn't jump on me since they actually wanted answers. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I must take my leave for now. |
![]() |
|
| Merry | Oct 1 2016, 02:20 AM Post #33 |
|
Oh, right, damn. So if Inazuma is telling the truth and if indeed someone was silenced before the Day started this time (like last Night) there might be a player who might not be able to speak...at all. |
![]() |
|
| Boa Sandersonia | Oct 1 2016, 02:37 AM Post #34 |
|
No. I was making my own post. Read it before starting this one.
I sent him something. He'll get a message.
I'm assuming "can vote" means vote won't be counted. No harm in trying unless the message out right states you will die if you vote. If the Silencer targets a player early enough so they can't talk at all that is a huge problem. If its a Day ability they can use it on anyone without fear, unless there's some to counter it. Funkfreed or Ohm could be screwed. We should keep watch for them. |
![]() |
|
| Richie | Oct 1 2016, 02:40 AM Post #35 |
![]()
|
Rather drunk right now to be honest, so heads up that I won't be able to post for some while. |
![]() |
|
| Haredas | Oct 1 2016, 02:46 AM Post #36 |
|
I don't know if this is the best excuse I have seen or the worst. but it made me lol |
![]() |
|
| Johnny | Oct 1 2016, 03:23 AM Post #37 |
|
Robert Townie Jr.
|
Hmm a drunkard is detrimental to the town's safety. Especially when it's a lion. Better lynch the lion for all our sakes. I suppose we should wait for Funkfreed to post so we can verify Boa's claim. There is the possibility of them being scum-buddies, but the way things played out (1st Funkfreed hints at role, then Boa lays the list of items, tries to pressure Funkfreed for role, now says she gave him item [which could be easily disproven by our Elephant friend]) makes me think Boa might not be scum after all. Would certainly be an odd way to go about being mafia. Unless... Funkfreed is mysteriously silent. Boa says oh, mafia must've silenced him because he said he had a role. If this happens, I call phooey. It would be far more likely Boa silenced him herself. Basically here is my stance: I highly doubt they're in cahoots based on their awkward exchanges yesterday.(I know it's possible scum buddies play off a fight, but this felt different.) If Funkfreed can verify Boa's claim, I suspect her less. That of course doesn't exonerate Funkfreed as it doesn't prove anything about him not being mafia. If he is conveniently silenced, I call scum. |
![]() |
|
| Laki | Oct 1 2016, 03:24 AM Post #38 |
![]()
|
Okay, so finally finished this long stupid damned post. In fact, I've got so much here that I'm gonna split it into multiple pieces, so it's not quite as hard to read. So, Part 1: My final thought in the Day yesterday was about how the whole thing with Dorry should be addressed in more detail today.
As I quoted here (and quoted others noting), it feels like you made a lot of posts that were just one-liners expressing rather vague ideas, almost always in fewer words and less detail than others used to say the same thing. Like something that you could point to if someone accuses you of not participating or expressing opinions, but not giving any valuable insight, either. |
![]() |
|
| Laki | Oct 1 2016, 03:24 AM Post #39 |
![]()
|
Part 2
As Ohm pointed out, you basically threatened to lynch him twice. The first time, you claimed that it was partially because he was annoying you (um, what? I'm pretty sure most of us annoyed most of the rest of us at some point yesterday, but we weren't all threatening to lynch each other), and also partially because he "fit your hypothesis of possible Mafia behaviors" (without explaining how so, or which ones, in any way). The second time, you just repeated a question that other people asked ("Yeah, how do you know?"). And in both case, didn't really follow it up or seriously question him much more. |
![]() |
|
| Laki | Oct 1 2016, 03:25 AM Post #40 |
![]()
|
Part 3 But hey, the soft lynching by itself could have just been harmless empty words, implied by this: That is, until this happened: So, you expressly contradict something you said earlier and don’t give any kind of explanation for it at all. Just, “I agree that he’s definitely suspicious.” Why? What did you find suspicious about it? Like, I said that my main problem was how, when he only got one post (or at least claimed this to be the case), it felt like he didn’t even try to actually make it helpful to our town. And Toto and Nero gave their reasons, too. (For the record, I'm not saying I agree with them, I'm pointing out that they were given.) Whether you agree with any of them or think they’re complete bullshit, at least they were there, to attempt to justify each of us being on the wagon. You had none at all. And then, subsequently:
This feels like an “Oh crap, I got called on my bandwagoning” reaction, and you trying to take it back with an “Oops, I was too hasty.” Which, as Elizabello pointed out below, just makes it look even worse.
Yup. As you can tell, I completely agree with the above. But, I actually showed why I agree, and didn’t just say so and expect everybody to think that was enough. |
![]() |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · The Dungeon · Next Topic » |







9:06 PM Jul 11