| Welcome to Godlimations. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Internet Pornography; A sin that needs to be talked about | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 18 Aug 2009, 09:13 PM (12,571 Views) | |
| conradw | 20 Oct 2009, 01:29 AM Post #256 |
|
Goliath
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I suppose it comes in the way we describe it. I'm sort of winging it here: Just as we can represent a concept such as freedom with a statue, we represent ideals such as gregariousness with a dude in a red suit. And if you don't think that the statue represents for a lot of people liberty and freedom, just imagine if the terrorists had blown it up. I don't want this to boil down into the an issue of semantics, like what is spirituality and what is supernatural, and all of that but it feels like this is headed that way |
![]() |
|
| conradw | 20 Oct 2009, 01:44 AM Post #257 |
|
Goliath
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
@arazec: after significant research, I have some to the conclusion, that clairvoyants are only entertainers. (and by significant research, I mean watching south park) |
![]() |
|
| Concolor | 20 Oct 2009, 02:26 AM Post #258 |
|
Barabbas
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
@conradw: Even though I love semantics, and think they are necessary when it comes to truly going in depth with complex issues. I'll do my best to steer clear of them. One interesting observation You know what would happen don't you? The people who adhere so much value to this symbol will go absolutely bonkers. They will wage war on anyone who bears a slight resemblance to the ones who blew it up. They will cast their people into hardships and struggles to gain retribution for their broken symbol. What if people cared less for symbols, and more for the values and ideas they represent? Would they still be as ready to sacrifice their freedom in the hunt for those who desecrated their symbol of liberty? I agree with you that it is the case that many people do use symbols to represent concepts. I do not agree that this is a good idea (you didn't say it was, I'm just stating my opinion). And I would never, ever agree that something is right or true just because most people do, say or think it (which you didn't say either, but with a little effort one could (mis)use your statements to point in that direction). |
|
Life is beautiful, love heals, people come through. Reason, compassion and love comes first. Everything else is secondary. Except for Skittles. - And emperor Cheezy!
| |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | 20 Oct 2009, 05:07 AM Post #259 |
|
Deleted User
|
So what are the ideas and beleifs behind the pornography you condone?
|
|
|
| Concolor | 20 Oct 2009, 05:08 AM Post #260 |
|
Barabbas
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Can't say I remember having condoned any pornography lately
|
|
Life is beautiful, love heals, people come through. Reason, compassion and love comes first. Everything else is secondary. Except for Skittles. - And emperor Cheezy!
| |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | 20 Oct 2009, 05:10 AM Post #261 |
|
Deleted User
|
but you agree its an O.k thing in general? |
|
|
| Concolor | 20 Oct 2009, 05:27 AM Post #262 |
|
Barabbas
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I agree it's an OK thing in principle, not necessarily in general. Example of porn I would think is safely within the limits of what is OK, by my standards: Concolor shows a bunch of pictures of himself from his holiday to a girl. In one of these photos he is on the beach and wearing only shorts. The girl asks if she could buy this picture of him. When Concolor asks why, she does not lie, but confesses that his hunky appearance in this photo is sexually stimulating to her. Concolor sells her the picture for her to use with this intent, thus making it a pornographic product. (This scenario is so realistic, I'm surprised it hasn't happened yet) Another example would be if a girl (or boy) asked Concolor if he could take some pictures of himself with his shirt of for them to use or redistribute in exchange for money, and assuming Concolor was fully aware that these pictures would then be spread out pretty much universally and he received adequate pay, I would also find this to be OK. (I'm always assuming Concolor to be a consenting adult in these examples.) Edited by Concolor, 20 Oct 2009, 05:27 AM.
|
|
Life is beautiful, love heals, people come through. Reason, compassion and love comes first. Everything else is secondary. Except for Skittles. - And emperor Cheezy!
| |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | 20 Oct 2009, 05:31 AM Post #263 |
|
Deleted User
|
So you think making,watching,distributing movies showing genitals of young adults is fine and acceptable? |
|
|
| Concolor | 20 Oct 2009, 05:48 AM Post #264 |
|
Barabbas
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Not necessarily in any or even most cases. But if it happens in a similar way as in one of these examples, I would most probably be OK with that. Let's turn it around for a second (I'm assuming you do not agree that my examples make for OK porn, so I'm trying to find out what you think about other cases of porn)Let's say Concolor has a wife, and she takes a photo of his privates and keeps it (like in her wallet or something). This would be porn, but not distributed. Would this be OK? Let's say Concolor has multiple wifes (like in the old testament) and one of them has a photo of his privates with the permission to distribute it among his wifes. She does so in exchange for money. The porn has now been distributed. Would this be OK? (I assume Concolor is a young adult, over the age of consent in the particular state these events take place) |
|
Life is beautiful, love heals, people come through. Reason, compassion and love comes first. Everything else is secondary. Except for Skittles. - And emperor Cheezy!
| |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | 20 Oct 2009, 05:50 AM Post #265 |
|
Deleted User
|
dont agree sickos carry that sort of stuff around and think its o.k answer mine |
|
|
| Concolor | 20 Oct 2009, 06:09 AM Post #266 |
|
Barabbas
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hey! You just insulted my hypothetical wife ![]() I would rather describe her as affectionate. Would she be a sicko if she carried a picture of my face in her wallet? Would she be a sicko if she carried a picture of my entire body? What if it was a picture from the beach and I was wearing only shorts? What if this picture made her feel the way every woman is entitled to feel about her man (i.e. sexual attraction)? Where do you draw the line for sicko? |
|
Life is beautiful, love heals, people come through. Reason, compassion and love comes first. Everything else is secondary. Except for Skittles. - And emperor Cheezy!
| |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | 20 Oct 2009, 06:17 AM Post #267 |
|
Deleted User
|
i draw the line at a person carrying around porn in their wallets and thinking its o.k |
|
|
| Concolor | 20 Oct 2009, 06:19 AM Post #268 |
|
Barabbas
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
OK, what if she left it in her bedroom drawer? |
|
Life is beautiful, love heals, people come through. Reason, compassion and love comes first. Everything else is secondary. Except for Skittles. - And emperor Cheezy!
| |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | 20 Oct 2009, 06:23 AM Post #269 |
|
Deleted User
|
sicko and under the bed worse you should have better taste in hypothetical women would you like your children to choose making porn videos as living? |
|
|
| Concolor | 20 Oct 2009, 06:30 AM Post #270 |
|
Barabbas
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nope. Nor would I want them to work in a cubicle for a job they don't really like, or smoke weed, or drink alkohol, or sit in front of the computer all day. I'll try to do my best with their upbringing, and after that it's really their choice. Are you really saying you don't want my hypothetical wife to be sexually attracted to me? Or an image of me? |
|
Life is beautiful, love heals, people come through. Reason, compassion and love comes first. Everything else is secondary. Except for Skittles. - And emperor Cheezy!
| |
![]() |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Debate · Next Topic » |




![]](http://z4.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



(I'm assuming you do not agree that my examples make for OK porn, so I'm trying to find out what you think about other cases of porn)
6:43 PM Jul 10