| Welcome to Godlimations. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| the end days; will it be 2012 | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 6 Sep 2009, 03:21 PM (4,402 Views) | |
| Concolor | 30 Oct 2009, 04:01 AM Post #61 |
|
Barabbas
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You're onto it A more useful representation is to try to take into account the wave/particle-duality of the electron and use a probability-distribution (~= orbital) to represent the electron around the atom. Also, you can't really account for the fact that the electron does not just spiral into the nucleus until you've developed quantum mechanics, which is why this was unexplainable at the time the older model of the atom was used.Now I'm just exited to see what new model one can expect that will give us an even better understanding of how the atom works and how long time it will take us to get there
|
|
Life is beautiful, love heals, people come through. Reason, compassion and love comes first. Everything else is secondary. Except for Skittles. - And emperor Cheezy!
| |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | 30 Oct 2009, 07:28 AM Post #62 |
|
Deleted User
|
Don't patronise me |
|
|
| Concolor | 30 Oct 2009, 07:31 AM Post #63 |
|
Barabbas
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wait, is that to me, Luemas or conradw? And what did you find patronizing? |
|
Life is beautiful, love heals, people come through. Reason, compassion and love comes first. Everything else is secondary. Except for Skittles. - And emperor Cheezy!
| |
![]() |
|
| conradw | 30 Oct 2009, 08:28 AM Post #64 |
|
Goliath
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
maybe that bit about the difference between being a liar and being wrong. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | 30 Oct 2009, 08:29 AM Post #65 |
|
Deleted User
|
|
|
|
| conradw | 31 Oct 2009, 06:29 AM Post #66 |
|
Goliath
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Now, if you say you've spoken to demons, I will say I don't believe you. The Bible speaks of demons because people 2000 years ago did not have the notion of psychological illness and disease. They were wrong and we shouldn't have any problem saying so. Incidentally, What does a demon look like? |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | 31 Oct 2009, 10:27 AM Post #67 |
|
Deleted User
|
thats o.k you dont need to beleive me Now the Good thing is you can bind up Demons in the name of Jesus because every knee shall bow to his name dont get cranky with me God gave us the authority to in his sons name and by his strength not ours.Spiritual oppression and disease are also overcome by the blood of Jesus-the bible was not wrong |
|
|
| Junior | 31 Oct 2009, 10:32 AM Post #68 |
![]()
Brother-in-law of Soul
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
what about those cases of possession nowadays that causes them to levitate the priest and throw him halfway across the room? I've never heard of a disease like that before... |
| Call it what you want | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | 31 Oct 2009, 10:49 AM Post #69 |
|
Deleted User
|
poor preisty
|
|
|
| Junior | 31 Oct 2009, 10:50 AM Post #70 |
![]()
Brother-in-law of Soul
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
oh he got off lucky. the one in the exorcist got thrown out of a two story window. |
| Call it what you want | |
![]() |
|
| conradw | 31 Oct 2009, 10:51 AM Post #71 |
|
Goliath
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm going to reiterate my question: what do demons look like? I've never heard of priests flying. Do you have a link? |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | 31 Oct 2009, 10:52 AM Post #72 |
|
Deleted User
|
how dramatic ! ...... i would never audition for that role
|
|
|
| Junior | 31 Oct 2009, 10:55 AM Post #73 |
![]()
Brother-in-law of Soul
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
answer 1: like this. this was the cover of 23 minutes in hell. the guy went to hell and came back, supposedly. I'm going to post the link instead, because the picture could scare small children. http://www.edburrell.com/Demon-n-Hell.jpg answer 2: well, nuns fly all the time, why not priests? |
| Call it what you want | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | 31 Oct 2009, 10:57 AM Post #74 |
|
Deleted User
|
funny oh and demons look like......... Spoiler: click to toggle
|
|
|
| Junior | 31 Oct 2009, 10:59 AM Post #75 |
![]()
Brother-in-law of Soul
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
well I would look evil too if I was locked up in hell for 3 billion years... |
| Call it what you want | |
![]() |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Debate · Next Topic » |




![]](http://z4.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)
A more useful representation is to try to take into account the wave/particle-duality of the electron and use a probability-distribution (~= orbital) to represent the electron around the atom. Also, you can't really account for the fact that the electron does not just spiral into the nucleus until you've developed quantum mechanics, which is why this was unexplainable at the time the older model of the atom was used.




poor preisty
i would never audition for that role
6:46 PM Jul 10