Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Logo
Search Members FAQ Portal
  • Navigation
  • Our Hoosier Board
  • →
  • Other
  • →
  • Politics
  • →
  • The third debate
Welcome to Our Hoosier Board!

Most of the posters here have been around for nearly a decade now. You'll find their knowledge and insight to be second to none. We have a really strong community and value everyone's opinions.

Feel free to jump into any thread and voice your opinion with conviction. We love heated debates and even some fanbase ribbing from time to time. We pride ourselves on the lack of moderation needed to make this board successful.

Please remember that we have been around many years and have an astute ability to tell the difference between an immature, childish, trash-talking troll and a passionate fan voicing his or her opinion. It is at the discretion of Jazen and myself whether any moderating actions should be taken at any given time. It's a very, very rare thing. In other words, no worries....you'll be fine!

Cheers,
sirbrianwilson

Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 8
The third debate
Tweet Topic Started: Oct 19 2016, 08:19 PM (745 Views)
Mr Gray Oct 21 2016, 01:04 PM Post #46
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
16,503
Group:
Members
Member
#26
Joined:
February 5, 2008
dreachon
Oct 21 2016, 12:59 PM
brumdog44
Oct 21 2016, 12:18 PM
Mr Gray
Oct 21 2016, 11:31 AM
brumdog44
Oct 21 2016, 10:18 AM
Mr Gray
Oct 21 2016, 07:50 AM
brumdog44
Oct 21 2016, 06:18 AM
Mr Gray
Oct 21 2016, 05:55 AM
One thing I noticed during the debate was Hillary kept looking down at her podium throughout most of her answers. Turns out she had a tablet there, which was likely connected to someone who was feeding answers to her.
I don't know where you are getting that information, but that a very similar conspiracy theory was used after the first debate and debunked. Sounds like nothing more than a recycled false charge.

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-teleprompter-debate/
You watched the debate didn't you Brum? You seriously didn't notice her looking down constantly throughout her answers?
LINK.
It gets really bad/obvious around 1:17:30, but especially at around 1:19:00.....like crazy bad.

Then again at 1:23:43, 1:24:10, 1:24:28 and then again really bad at 1:27:28...like she had to look down at "something" for every single bullet point....n way that those are just her paper notes or response notes she wrote down while Trump spoke, because she wasn't even writing anything while he spoke during that segment.

[utube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGQGwIr47YY[/utube]
That's not a link of proof. Pretty easy to prove that she was using a tablet if she was.

And you stated 'turns out she used a tablet'. So prove it.
Not only "turns out she had a tablet" but also "likely connected to someone feeding her answers".
she's such an honest and straightforward person, I see why you would doubt her willingness to do something like that. :rofl:
Posted Image
The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dreachon Oct 21 2016, 07:51 PM Post #47
Member Avatar
Creative Title Here
Posts:
24,067
Group:
Members
Member
#148
Joined:
February 10, 2008
Mr Gray
Oct 21 2016, 01:04 PM
dreachon
Oct 21 2016, 12:59 PM
brumdog44
Oct 21 2016, 12:18 PM
Mr Gray
Oct 21 2016, 11:31 AM
brumdog44
Oct 21 2016, 10:18 AM
Mr Gray
Oct 21 2016, 07:50 AM
brumdog44
Oct 21 2016, 06:18 AM
Mr Gray
Oct 21 2016, 05:55 AM
One thing I noticed during the debate was Hillary kept looking down at her podium throughout most of her answers. Turns out she had a tablet there, which was likely connected to someone who was feeding answers to her.
I don't know where you are getting that information, but that a very similar conspiracy theory was used after the first debate and debunked. Sounds like nothing more than a recycled false charge.

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-teleprompter-debate/
You watched the debate didn't you Brum? You seriously didn't notice her looking down constantly throughout her answers?
LINK.
It gets really bad/obvious around 1:17:30, but especially at around 1:19:00.....like crazy bad.

Then again at 1:23:43, 1:24:10, 1:24:28 and then again really bad at 1:27:28...like she had to look down at "something" for every single bullet point....n way that those are just her paper notes or response notes she wrote down while Trump spoke, because she wasn't even writing anything while he spoke during that segment.

[utube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGQGwIr47YY[/utube]
That's not a link of proof. Pretty easy to prove that she was using a tablet if she was.

And you stated 'turns out she used a tablet'. So prove it.
Not only "turns out she had a tablet" but also "likely connected to someone feeding her answers".
she's such an honest and straightforward person, I see why you would doubt her willingness to do something like that. :rofl:
Not what I said at all. I'm sure she would do it if she could. But you honestly think this could be done? Just imagine all that would have to happen for this to be the case. It's totally implausible. Impossible? Maybe not. But if that is anything other than a light, I'd be absolutely stunned.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
brumdog44 Oct 21 2016, 08:07 PM Post #48
Member Avatar
The guy picked last in gym class
Posts:
43,823
Group:
Members
Member
#181
Joined:
February 20, 2008
Screw the 'she's such a straightforward person' statement. Gray said it turns out she had a tablet -- his words. He stated it as a fact.

So prove it.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dreachon Oct 21 2016, 09:56 PM Post #49
Member Avatar
Creative Title Here
Posts:
24,067
Group:
Members
Member
#148
Joined:
February 10, 2008
Let's play devil's advocate and pretend that it is a teleprompter. What would it actually take to get a teleprompter in the lectern with no one knowing? I mean how many people would have to be in on it? From the design of the lectern, to the podium manufacturer, to the people who installed it, etc? And no one found out this was happening? If it was a teleprompter, it clearly has to be custom made because no company would put a tiny teleprompter screen in their lectern and then plop the microphone stand smack in the middle of it. The idea that this could be anything other than built in illumination is just preposterous.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
brumdog44 Oct 21 2016, 10:30 PM Post #50
Member Avatar
The guy picked last in gym class
Posts:
43,823
Group:
Members
Member
#181
Joined:
February 20, 2008
dreachon
Oct 21 2016, 09:56 PM
Let's play devil's advocate and pretend that it is a teleprompter. What would it actually take to get a teleprompter in the lectern with no one knowing? I mean how many people would have to be in on it? From the design of the lectern, to the podium manufacturer, to the people who installed it, etc? And no one found out this was happening? If it was a teleprompter, it clearly has to be custom made because no company would put a tiny teleprompter screen in their lectern and then plop the microphone stand smack in the middle of it. The idea that this could be anything other than built in illumination is just preposterous.
Even Fox News had previously debunked the stupid tin foil hat theory it the first debate about her having a teleprompter, LOL.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULnJL7u6jOE

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mr Gray Oct 21 2016, 10:32 PM Post #51
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
16,503
Group:
Members
Member
#26
Joined:
February 5, 2008
dreachon
Oct 21 2016, 09:56 PM
Let's play devil's advocate and pretend that it is a teleprompter. What would it actually take to get a teleprompter in the lectern with no one knowing? I mean how many people would have to be in on it? From the design of the lectern, to the podium manufacturer, to the people who installed it, etc? And no one found out this was happening? If it was a teleprompter, it clearly has to be custom made because no company would put a tiny teleprompter screen in their lectern and then plop the microphone stand smack in the middle of it. The idea that this could be anything other than built in illumination is just preposterous.
I agree it would take a lot but she's Hillary Clinton man.....she has resources that you and will never be able to fathom.
Posted Image
The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
brumdog44 Oct 21 2016, 10:42 PM Post #52
Member Avatar
The guy picked last in gym class
Posts:
43,823
Group:
Members
Member
#181
Joined:
February 20, 2008
Mr Gray
Oct 21 2016, 10:32 PM
dreachon
Oct 21 2016, 09:56 PM
Let's play devil's advocate and pretend that it is a teleprompter. What would it actually take to get a teleprompter in the lectern with no one knowing? I mean how many people would have to be in on it? From the design of the lectern, to the podium manufacturer, to the people who installed it, etc? And no one found out this was happening? If it was a teleprompter, it clearly has to be custom made because no company would put a tiny teleprompter screen in their lectern and then plop the microphone stand smack in the middle of it. The idea that this could be anything other than built in illumination is just preposterous.
I agree it would take a lot but she's Hillary Clinton man.....she has resources that you and will never be able to fathom.
So it's a hate-filled accusation as opposed to a statement of fact, yes?
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dreachon Oct 21 2016, 11:15 PM Post #53
Member Avatar
Creative Title Here
Posts:
24,067
Group:
Members
Member
#148
Joined:
February 10, 2008
brumdog44
Oct 21 2016, 10:30 PM
dreachon
Oct 21 2016, 09:56 PM
Let's play devil's advocate and pretend that it is a teleprompter. What would it actually take to get a teleprompter in the lectern with no one knowing? I mean how many people would have to be in on it? From the design of the lectern, to the podium manufacturer, to the people who installed it, etc? And no one found out this was happening? If it was a teleprompter, it clearly has to be custom made because no company would put a tiny teleprompter screen in their lectern and then plop the microphone stand smack in the middle of it. The idea that this could be anything other than built in illumination is just preposterous.
Even Fox News had previously debunked the stupid tin foil hat theory it the first debate about her having a teleprompter, LOL.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULnJL7u6jOE

"Each podium was outfitted with a light"

Whaddaya know. The most logical explanation is the right one.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mr Gray Oct 22 2016, 07:02 AM Post #54
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
16,503
Group:
Members
Member
#26
Joined:
February 5, 2008
brumdog44
Oct 21 2016, 10:42 PM
Mr Gray
Oct 21 2016, 10:32 PM
dreachon
Oct 21 2016, 09:56 PM
Let's play devil's advocate and pretend that it is a teleprompter. What would it actually take to get a teleprompter in the lectern with no one knowing? I mean how many people would have to be in on it? From the design of the lectern, to the podium manufacturer, to the people who installed it, etc? And no one found out this was happening? If it was a teleprompter, it clearly has to be custom made because no company would put a tiny teleprompter screen in their lectern and then plop the microphone stand smack in the middle of it. The idea that this could be anything other than built in illumination is just preposterous.
I agree it would take a lot but she's Hillary Clinton man.....she has resources that you and will never be able to fathom.
So it's a hate-filled accusation as opposed to a statement of fact, yes?
I don't hate Hillary and I believe it to be a fact. Based on the evidence, I'm convinced.
Posted Image
The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dreachon Oct 22 2016, 08:08 AM Post #55
Member Avatar
Creative Title Here
Posts:
24,067
Group:
Members
Member
#148
Joined:
February 10, 2008
Mr Gray
Oct 22 2016, 07:02 AM
brumdog44
Oct 21 2016, 10:42 PM
Mr Gray
Oct 21 2016, 10:32 PM
dreachon
Oct 21 2016, 09:56 PM
Let's play devil's advocate and pretend that it is a teleprompter. What would it actually take to get a teleprompter in the lectern with no one knowing? I mean how many people would have to be in on it? From the design of the lectern, to the podium manufacturer, to the people who installed it, etc? And no one found out this was happening? If it was a teleprompter, it clearly has to be custom made because no company would put a tiny teleprompter screen in their lectern and then plop the microphone stand smack in the middle of it. The idea that this could be anything other than built in illumination is just preposterous.
I agree it would take a lot but she's Hillary Clinton man.....she has resources that you and will never be able to fathom.
So it's a hate-filled accusation as opposed to a statement of fact, yes?
I don't hate Hillary and I believe it to be a fact. Based on the evidence, I'm convinced.
Lol. For someone who hates Twitter and Reddit because of their poor misinformation, you certainly buy into their ridiculous conspiracy theories easily enough.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mr Gray Oct 22 2016, 08:15 AM Post #56
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
16,503
Group:
Members
Member
#26
Joined:
February 5, 2008
dreachon
Oct 22 2016, 08:08 AM
Mr Gray
Oct 22 2016, 07:02 AM
brumdog44
Oct 21 2016, 10:42 PM
Mr Gray
Oct 21 2016, 10:32 PM
dreachon
Oct 21 2016, 09:56 PM
Let's play devil's advocate and pretend that it is a teleprompter. What would it actually take to get a teleprompter in the lectern with no one knowing? I mean how many people would have to be in on it? From the design of the lectern, to the podium manufacturer, to the people who installed it, etc? And no one found out this was happening? If it was a teleprompter, it clearly has to be custom made because no company would put a tiny teleprompter screen in their lectern and then plop the microphone stand smack in the middle of it. The idea that this could be anything other than built in illumination is just preposterous.
I agree it would take a lot but she's Hillary Clinton man.....she has resources that you and will never be able to fathom.
So it's a hate-filled accusation as opposed to a statement of fact, yes?
I don't hate Hillary and I believe it to be a fact. Based on the evidence, I'm convinced.
Lol. For someone who hates Twitter and Reddit because of their poor misinformation, you certainly buy into their ridiculous conspiracy theories easily enough.
I haven't looked at Reddit or twitter for at least 3 months. I noticed the way she was looking down and appeared to be reading during the debate on my own. When I searched for it the next day, that's the first time I had heard that there even was a previous theory about rigged podium or whatever.
Posted Image
The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
brumdog44 Oct 22 2016, 08:18 AM Post #57
Member Avatar
The guy picked last in gym class
Posts:
43,823
Group:
Members
Member
#181
Joined:
February 20, 2008
I'm out on this one. Done wasting my time.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dreachon Oct 22 2016, 09:15 AM Post #58
Member Avatar
Creative Title Here
Posts:
24,067
Group:
Members
Member
#148
Joined:
February 10, 2008
Mr Gray
Oct 22 2016, 08:15 AM
dreachon
Oct 22 2016, 08:08 AM
Mr Gray
Oct 22 2016, 07:02 AM
brumdog44
Oct 21 2016, 10:42 PM
Mr Gray
Oct 21 2016, 10:32 PM
dreachon
Oct 21 2016, 09:56 PM
Let's play devil's advocate and pretend that it is a teleprompter. What would it actually take to get a teleprompter in the lectern with no one knowing? I mean how many people would have to be in on it? From the design of the lectern, to the podium manufacturer, to the people who installed it, etc? And no one found out this was happening? If it was a teleprompter, it clearly has to be custom made because no company would put a tiny teleprompter screen in their lectern and then plop the microphone stand smack in the middle of it. The idea that this could be anything other than built in illumination is just preposterous.
I agree it would take a lot but she's Hillary Clinton man.....she has resources that you and will never be able to fathom.
So it's a hate-filled accusation as opposed to a statement of fact, yes?
I don't hate Hillary and I believe it to be a fact. Based on the evidence, I'm convinced.
Lol. For someone who hates Twitter and Reddit because of their poor misinformation, you certainly buy into their ridiculous conspiracy theories easily enough.
I haven't looked at Reddit or twitter for at least 3 months. I noticed the way she was looking down and appeared to be reading during the debate on my own. When I searched for it the next day, that's the first time I had heard that there even was a previous theory about rigged podium or whatever.
Where do you think the conspiracy theory started?

Despite a news report that they checked with the committee'who confirmed the lecterns had lights, you want to believe the nearly impossible teleprompter conspiracy because it appeared she was reading. En serio? You think the earth is flat as well?
Edited by dreachon, Oct 22 2016, 09:22 AM.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
HoosierLars Oct 22 2016, 09:43 AM Post #59
Member Avatar
3 in a row
Posts:
22,916
Group:
Members
Member
#20
Joined:
February 5, 2008
I hate strongly dislike Hillary.
Edited by HoosierLars, Oct 22 2016, 10:19 AM.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mr Gray Oct 22 2016, 10:19 AM Post #60
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
16,503
Group:
Members
Member
#26
Joined:
February 5, 2008
dreachon
Oct 22 2016, 09:15 AM
Mr Gray
Oct 22 2016, 08:15 AM
dreachon
Oct 22 2016, 08:08 AM
Mr Gray
Oct 22 2016, 07:02 AM
brumdog44
Oct 21 2016, 10:42 PM
Mr Gray
Oct 21 2016, 10:32 PM
dreachon
Oct 21 2016, 09:56 PM
Let's play devil's advocate and pretend that it is a teleprompter. What would it actually take to get a teleprompter in the lectern with no one knowing? I mean how many people would have to be in on it? From the design of the lectern, to the podium manufacturer, to the people who installed it, etc? And no one found out this was happening? If it was a teleprompter, it clearly has to be custom made because no company would put a tiny teleprompter screen in their lectern and then plop the microphone stand smack in the middle of it. The idea that this could be anything other than built in illumination is just preposterous.
I agree it would take a lot but she's Hillary Clinton man.....she has resources that you and will never be able to fathom.
So it's a hate-filled accusation as opposed to a statement of fact, yes?
I don't hate Hillary and I believe it to be a fact. Based on the evidence, I'm convinced.
Lol. For someone who hates Twitter and Reddit because of their poor misinformation, you certainly buy into their ridiculous conspiracy theories easily enough.
I haven't looked at Reddit or twitter for at least 3 months. I noticed the way she was looking down and appeared to be reading during the debate on my own. When I searched for it the next day, that's the first time I had heard that there even was a previous theory about rigged podium or whatever.
Where do you think the conspiracy theory started?

Despite a news report that they checked with the committee'who confirmed the lecterns had lights, you want to believe the nearly impossible teleprompter conspiracy because it appeared she was reading. En serio? You think the earth is flat as well?
I don't know anything about the theory on the first debate. I didn't observe anything odd myself so that's enough for me. That being said, who was it who said the podiums had lights and that she didn't have a teleprompter? The committee? What committee?
Posted Image
The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community.
Learn More · Register for Free
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Politics · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 8

Track Topic · E-mail Topic Time: 7:52 PM Jul 10
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy