Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Logo
Search Members FAQ Portal
  • Navigation
  • Our Hoosier Board
  • →
  • Big Ten Sports
  • →
  • Hoosier Sports
  • →
  • OT: Cole Hammels
Welcome to Our Hoosier Board!

Most of the posters here have been around for nearly a decade now. You'll find their knowledge and insight to be second to none. We have a really strong community and value everyone's opinions.

Feel free to jump into any thread and voice your opinion with conviction. We love heated debates and even some fanbase ribbing from time to time. We pride ourselves on the lack of moderation needed to make this board successful.

Please remember that we have been around many years and have an astute ability to tell the difference between an immature, childish, trash-talking troll and a passionate fan voicing his or her opinion. It is at the discretion of Jazen and myself whether any moderating actions should be taken at any given time. It's a very, very rare thing. In other words, no worries....you'll be fine!

Cheers,
sirbrianwilson

Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
OT: Cole Hammels
Tweet Topic Started: Oct 31 2009, 10:14 PM (385 Views)
troubleatiu Nov 3 2009, 02:33 PM Post #31
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
3,218
Group:
Members
Member
#21
Joined:
February 5, 2008
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:28 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:26 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:15 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:10 PM
come on man....hes a good ballplayer, i got his rookie card for a reason. i didnt want him in the AL and damn sure didnt want him in NY.
and yeah, until the cubs can overcome 100 years of futilty...theyll be irrelevant.
And the Sox were irrelevant before 2004?

I'm guessing you'll say yes now, but you would have answered completely different in 2003.
easy on the cub complex man. i only used the cubs as an example cause theres so many of you here. i could have easily said cleveland, or kansas city. i just chose the cubs for obvious reasons.
Irrelevant, and I'm sure every sports fan in America knows their history. I'd say thats a little more than irrelevant.
not winning anything in 100 years and not even sniffing the WS in 60 years is grating on ya, isnt it? lol.
*note* i first typed 50 years, but knowing dumbfuck BG 01 is waiting with his wiki reference, i took a minute and ammended my reply.
Posted Image
"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer."--Henry Kissinger
"What luck for rulers that men do not think."- Adolph Hitler
"Terrorists don't want your freedoms--they want your life. It's dictators and tyrants who want your freedoms."-author unidentified
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dçamden03 Nov 3 2009, 04:26 PM Post #32
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
24,523
Group:
Members
Member
#8
Joined:
February 4, 2008
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:33 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:28 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:26 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:15 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:10 PM
come on man....hes a good ballplayer, i got his rookie card for a reason. i didnt want him in the AL and damn sure didnt want him in NY.
and yeah, until the cubs can overcome 100 years of futilty...theyll be irrelevant.
And the Sox were irrelevant before 2004?

I'm guessing you'll say yes now, but you would have answered completely different in 2003.
easy on the cub complex man. i only used the cubs as an example cause theres so many of you here. i could have easily said cleveland, or kansas city. i just chose the cubs for obvious reasons.
Irrelevant, and I'm sure every sports fan in America knows their history. I'd say thats a little more than irrelevant.
not winning anything in 100 years and not even sniffing the WS in 60 years is grating on ya, isnt it? lol.
*note* i first typed 50 years, but knowing dumbfuck BG 01 is waiting with his wiki reference, i took a minute and ammended my reply.
Honestly, not really. I like the Cubs, have since I was a kid. Do I want them to win? Of course, as much as any other fan, but it doesn't grate on me at all.
“He’s always been a guy — maybe to a fault — he would always try to do what I said. That seems like something simple in coaching, but those are the guys I hang my hat on. We’ve had some guys in our program, we had a couple guys that felt I had a bias towards E’Twaun Moore. And they were right — I do have a bias towards E’Twaun Moore. I like guys that go to class, that are academic All-Americans, that come early, that stay late, that love the game of basketball. I am biased towards those guys. And I’m biased towards Rob Hummel. But I’m also biased towards their habits, their work ethic, and how they carry themselves."

"I’d take him to the ends of the earth — I’d want him playing for me.” - Bo Ryan on Robbie Hummel

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
brumdog44 Nov 3 2009, 06:33 PM Post #33
Member Avatar
The guy picked last in gym class
Posts:
43,823
Group:
Members
Member
#181
Joined:
February 20, 2008
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 04:26 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:33 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:28 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:26 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:15 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:10 PM
come on man....hes a good ballplayer, i got his rookie card for a reason. i didnt want him in the AL and damn sure didnt want him in NY.
and yeah, until the cubs can overcome 100 years of futilty...theyll be irrelevant.
And the Sox were irrelevant before 2004?

I'm guessing you'll say yes now, but you would have answered completely different in 2003.
easy on the cub complex man. i only used the cubs as an example cause theres so many of you here. i could have easily said cleveland, or kansas city. i just chose the cubs for obvious reasons.
Irrelevant, and I'm sure every sports fan in America knows their history. I'd say thats a little more than irrelevant.
not winning anything in 100 years and not even sniffing the WS in 60 years is grating on ya, isnt it? lol.
*note* i first typed 50 years, but knowing dumbfuck BG 01 is waiting with his wiki reference, i took a minute and ammended my reply.
Honestly, not really. I like the Cubs, have since I was a kid. Do I want them to win? Of course, as much as any other fan, but it doesn't grate on me at all.
The White Sox, Cardinals, and Red Sox have all won titles this decade.

Talk about God screwing with Cubs fans. The kicker is that I hear God looks a awful lot like Lou Brock.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
troubleatiu Nov 3 2009, 11:15 PM Post #34
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
3,218
Group:
Members
Member
#21
Joined:
February 5, 2008
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 04:26 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:33 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:28 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:26 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:15 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:10 PM
come on man....hes a good ballplayer, i got his rookie card for a reason. i didnt want him in the AL and damn sure didnt want him in NY.
and yeah, until the cubs can overcome 100 years of futilty...theyll be irrelevant.
And the Sox were irrelevant before 2004?

I'm guessing you'll say yes now, but you would have answered completely different in 2003.
easy on the cub complex man. i only used the cubs as an example cause theres so many of you here. i could have easily said cleveland, or kansas city. i just chose the cubs for obvious reasons.
Irrelevant, and I'm sure every sports fan in America knows their history. I'd say thats a little more than irrelevant.
not winning anything in 100 years and not even sniffing the WS in 60 years is grating on ya, isnt it? lol.
*note* i first typed 50 years, but knowing dumbfuck BG 01 is waiting with his wiki reference, i took a minute and ammended my reply.
Honestly, not really. I like the Cubs, have since I was a kid. Do I want them to win? Of course, as much as any other fan, but it doesn't grate on me at all.
really? then why the sensitivity when i called the cubs irrelevent?

fwiw, my grandmother, god rest her soul, would take me behind the woodshed if she was still alive hearing me say that about her beloved cubs. she died at 81 and never experienced a WS title...im 42 and ive enjoyed 2. life is fucking weird.
Posted Image
"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer."--Henry Kissinger
"What luck for rulers that men do not think."- Adolph Hitler
"Terrorists don't want your freedoms--they want your life. It's dictators and tyrants who want your freedoms."-author unidentified
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
troubleatiu Nov 3 2009, 11:16 PM Post #35
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
3,218
Group:
Members
Member
#21
Joined:
February 5, 2008
brumdog44
Nov 3 2009, 06:33 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 04:26 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:33 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:28 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:26 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:15 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:10 PM
come on man....hes a good ballplayer, i got his rookie card for a reason. i didnt want him in the AL and damn sure didnt want him in NY.
and yeah, until the cubs can overcome 100 years of futilty...theyll be irrelevant.
And the Sox were irrelevant before 2004?

I'm guessing you'll say yes now, but you would have answered completely different in 2003.
easy on the cub complex man. i only used the cubs as an example cause theres so many of you here. i could have easily said cleveland, or kansas city. i just chose the cubs for obvious reasons.
Irrelevant, and I'm sure every sports fan in America knows their history. I'd say thats a little more than irrelevant.
not winning anything in 100 years and not even sniffing the WS in 60 years is grating on ya, isnt it? lol.
*note* i first typed 50 years, but knowing dumbfuck BG 01 is waiting with his wiki reference, i took a minute and ammended my reply.
Honestly, not really. I like the Cubs, have since I was a kid. Do I want them to win? Of course, as much as any other fan, but it doesn't grate on me at all.
The White Sox, Cardinals, and Red Sox have all won titles this decade.

Talk about God screwing with Cubs fans. The kicker is that I hear God looks a awful lot like Lou Brock.
hells bells the angels and the fucking marlins, THE FUCKING MARLINS have won titles this decade. woah to be a cub fan.
Posted Image
"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer."--Henry Kissinger
"What luck for rulers that men do not think."- Adolph Hitler
"Terrorists don't want your freedoms--they want your life. It's dictators and tyrants who want your freedoms."-author unidentified
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dçamden03 Nov 4 2009, 01:14 AM Post #36
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
24,523
Group:
Members
Member
#8
Joined:
February 4, 2008
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 11:15 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 04:26 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:33 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:28 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:26 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:15 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:10 PM
come on man....hes a good ballplayer, i got his rookie card for a reason. i didnt want him in the AL and damn sure didnt want him in NY.
and yeah, until the cubs can overcome 100 years of futilty...theyll be irrelevant.
And the Sox were irrelevant before 2004?

I'm guessing you'll say yes now, but you would have answered completely different in 2003.
easy on the cub complex man. i only used the cubs as an example cause theres so many of you here. i could have easily said cleveland, or kansas city. i just chose the cubs for obvious reasons.
Irrelevant, and I'm sure every sports fan in America knows their history. I'd say thats a little more than irrelevant.
not winning anything in 100 years and not even sniffing the WS in 60 years is grating on ya, isnt it? lol.
*note* i first typed 50 years, but knowing dumbfuck BG 01 is waiting with his wiki reference, i took a minute and ammended my reply.
Honestly, not really. I like the Cubs, have since I was a kid. Do I want them to win? Of course, as much as any other fan, but it doesn't grate on me at all.
really? then why the sensitivity when i called the cubs irrelevent?

fwiw, my grandmother, god rest her soul, would take me behind the woodshed if she was still alive hearing me say that about her beloved cubs. she died at 81 and never experienced a WS title...im 42 and ive enjoyed 2. life is fucking weird.
No sensitivity, just wondering why you would call the Cubs irrelevant, when just a few years earlier, you wouldn't call the Red Sox irrelevant.

But once the Red Sox finally found their luck and won a championship, you become very, very arrogant.
“He’s always been a guy — maybe to a fault — he would always try to do what I said. That seems like something simple in coaching, but those are the guys I hang my hat on. We’ve had some guys in our program, we had a couple guys that felt I had a bias towards E’Twaun Moore. And they were right — I do have a bias towards E’Twaun Moore. I like guys that go to class, that are academic All-Americans, that come early, that stay late, that love the game of basketball. I am biased towards those guys. And I’m biased towards Rob Hummel. But I’m also biased towards their habits, their work ethic, and how they carry themselves."

"I’d take him to the ends of the earth — I’d want him playing for me.” - Bo Ryan on Robbie Hummel

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dçamden03 Nov 4 2009, 01:17 AM Post #37
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
24,523
Group:
Members
Member
#8
Joined:
February 4, 2008
brumdog44
Nov 3 2009, 06:33 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 04:26 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:33 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:28 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:26 PM
dcamden03
Nov 3 2009, 02:15 PM
troubleatiu
Nov 3 2009, 02:10 PM
come on man....hes a good ballplayer, i got his rookie card for a reason. i didnt want him in the AL and damn sure didnt want him in NY.
and yeah, until the cubs can overcome 100 years of futilty...theyll be irrelevant.
And the Sox were irrelevant before 2004?

I'm guessing you'll say yes now, but you would have answered completely different in 2003.
easy on the cub complex man. i only used the cubs as an example cause theres so many of you here. i could have easily said cleveland, or kansas city. i just chose the cubs for obvious reasons.
Irrelevant, and I'm sure every sports fan in America knows their history. I'd say thats a little more than irrelevant.
not winning anything in 100 years and not even sniffing the WS in 60 years is grating on ya, isnt it? lol.
*note* i first typed 50 years, but knowing dumbfuck BG 01 is waiting with his wiki reference, i took a minute and ammended my reply.
Honestly, not really. I like the Cubs, have since I was a kid. Do I want them to win? Of course, as much as any other fan, but it doesn't grate on me at all.
The White Sox, Cardinals, and Red Sox have all won titles this decade.

Talk about God screwing with Cubs fans. The kicker is that I hear God looks a awful lot like Lou Brock.
God doesn't screw at me at all. Th Cubs just don't win a World Series title. Thats not God's will or anything, thats just how sports go. Everyone involved in all of this are complete and utter idiots/
“He’s always been a guy — maybe to a fault — he would always try to do what I said. That seems like something simple in coaching, but those are the guys I hang my hat on. We’ve had some guys in our program, we had a couple guys that felt I had a bias towards E’Twaun Moore. And they were right — I do have a bias towards E’Twaun Moore. I like guys that go to class, that are academic All-Americans, that come early, that stay late, that love the game of basketball. I am biased towards those guys. And I’m biased towards Rob Hummel. But I’m also biased towards their habits, their work ethic, and how they carry themselves."

"I’d take him to the ends of the earth — I’d want him playing for me.” - Bo Ryan on Robbie Hummel

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you
« Previous Topic · Hoosier Sports · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Track Topic · E-mail Topic Time: 7:26 PM Jul 10
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy