Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Logo
Search Members FAQ Portal
  • Navigation
  • Our Hoosier Board
  • →
  • Other
  • →
  • Politics
  • →
  • Huntsman passes Paul in New Hampshire!
Welcome to Our Hoosier Board!

Most of the posters here have been around for nearly a decade now. You'll find their knowledge and insight to be second to none. We have a really strong community and value everyone's opinions.

Feel free to jump into any thread and voice your opinion with conviction. We love heated debates and even some fanbase ribbing from time to time. We pride ourselves on the lack of moderation needed to make this board successful.

Please remember that we have been around many years and have an astute ability to tell the difference between an immature, childish, trash-talking troll and a passionate fan voicing his or her opinion. It is at the discretion of Jazen and myself whether any moderating actions should be taken at any given time. It's a very, very rare thing. In other words, no worries....you'll be fine!

Cheers,
sirbrianwilson

Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • …
  • 5
Huntsman passes Paul in New Hampshire!
Tweet Topic Started: Dec 18 2011, 01:25 PM (506 Views)
HoosierLars Dec 18 2011, 01:25 PM Post #1
Member Avatar
3 in a row
Posts:
22,916
Group:
Members
Member
#20
Joined:
February 5, 2008
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2011/1215/Jon-Huntsman-leapfrogs-Ron-Paul-in-New-Hampshire-says-poll
The latest poll out of New Hampshire (released late Wednesday night) shows Mitt Romney well in the lead, Newt Gingrich continuing to pick up steam but a surprising charge into third place - Jon Huntsman.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
brumdog44 Dec 18 2011, 03:57 PM Post #2
Member Avatar
The guy picked last in gym class
Posts:
43,823
Group:
Members
Member
#181
Joined:
February 20, 2008
Wow! Third place in New Hampshire!

Clear out the oval office....
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
HoosierLars Dec 18 2011, 04:28 PM Post #3
Member Avatar
3 in a row
Posts:
22,916
Group:
Members
Member
#20
Joined:
February 5, 2008
brumdog44
Dec 18 2011, 03:57 PM
Wow! Third place in New Hampshire!

Clear out the oval office....
The trend is my friend. He still has to beat Carter 2.0 next November.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
HoosierLars Dec 19 2011, 12:45 AM Post #4
Member Avatar
3 in a row
Posts:
22,916
Group:
Members
Member
#20
Joined:
February 5, 2008
But after months of remaining stuck in the single digits in the polls, the Republican presidential candidate is showing some signs of success in the final weeks before the New Hampshire primary. His state poll numbers are rising, he received two newspaper endorsements today, and many independent voters say they’re looking at Huntsman.
http://www.boston.com/Boston/politicalintelligence/2011/12/jon-huntsman-long-hours-new-hampshire-begin-pay-off/KiORRrc2rtq62Wk8g3lRYO/index.html

Even if Huntsman doesn't get the nomination, I hope he manages to hurt Guingerich's and Paul's campaigns, and ensure Romney gets it.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
brumdog44 Dec 19 2011, 07:41 AM Post #5
Member Avatar
The guy picked last in gym class
Posts:
43,823
Group:
Members
Member
#181
Joined:
February 20, 2008
Your link:

"But even if Huntsman does well in New Hampshire, he will face an uphill struggle. While Romney has been building up his campaign organization around the country, and Gingrich enjoys nationwide name recognition, Huntsman has poured almost all his resources into New Hampshire, with some campaigning in South Carolina and Florida. His fund-raising has been low."

"So Huntsman is continuing his frenetic pace in the state – holding his 125th through 128th public events today.'

....all of this to be at 13% in.New.Hampshire.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
hoosierinhogville Dec 19 2011, 11:49 AM Post #6
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
5,812
Group:
Members
Member
#155
Joined:
February 11, 2008
You know in your rush to crown your newest flavor of the month you forgot to mention the two other New Hampshire polls CONDUCTED DURING THE SAME TIME FRAME that show Paul with a fairly significant lead over Huntsman.
Check it:
Rassmusen: Romney 33%, Gingrich 22%, Paul 18% Huntsman 10%

Insider Advantage: Romney 29%; Gingrich 24%; Paul 21%; Huntsman 11
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mr Gray Dec 19 2011, 01:44 PM Post #7
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
16,503
Group:
Members
Member
#26
Joined:
February 5, 2008
hoosierinhogville
Dec 19 2011, 11:49 AM
You know in your rush to crown your newest flavor of the month you forgot to mention the two other New Hampshire polls CONDUCTED DURING THE SAME TIME FRAME that show Paul with a fairly significant lead over Huntsman.
Check it:
Rassmusen: Romney 33%, Gingrich 22%, Paul 18% Huntsman 10%

Insider Advantage: Romney 29%; Gingrich 24%; Paul 21%; Huntsman 11
Lars, you seem to be acknowledging everyone everytime they find the lead in any poll, except Paul, who has been in the lead many times in many polls....and just pulled ahead of Newt in Iowa. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/gingrich-collapses-iowa-ron-paul-surges-front/46360/
Posted Image
The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
HoosierLars Dec 20 2011, 12:00 AM Post #8
Member Avatar
3 in a row
Posts:
22,916
Group:
Members
Member
#20
Joined:
February 5, 2008
Mr Gray
Dec 19 2011, 01:44 PM
hoosierinhogville
Dec 19 2011, 11:49 AM
You know in your rush to crown your newest flavor of the month you forgot to mention the two other New Hampshire polls CONDUCTED DURING THE SAME TIME FRAME that show Paul with a fairly significant lead over Huntsman.
Check it:
Rassmusen: Romney 33%, Gingrich 22%, Paul 18% Huntsman 10%

Insider Advantage: Romney 29%; Gingrich 24%; Paul 21%; Huntsman 11
Lars, you seem to be acknowledging everyone everytime they find the lead in any poll, except Paul, who has been in the lead many times in many polls....and just pulled ahead of Newt in Iowa. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/gingrich-collapses-iowa-ron-paul-surges-front/46360/
I acknowledge candidates I like. Sadly, the more I've learned about Paul in the last few months, the more I've concluded he's not fit for the job of President. He has a solid 5-7% base, but unless his anti-war, pot smoking, government conspiracy theorist following increases, I don't see how he gets the nomination. All of the other candidates share his general view of reducing the size and scope of the Federal government, so he doesn't have much to offer, IMO.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
brumdog44 Dec 20 2011, 12:28 AM Post #9
Member Avatar
The guy picked last in gym class
Posts:
43,823
Group:
Members
Member
#181
Joined:
February 20, 2008
No single national poll has Paul in the 5 to 7 % range.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-1452.html

OF COURSE he isn't getting the nomination. But your opinion of candidates has from day one clouded your opinion of their chance to win, which is probably why you have said a ridiculous jump from one candidate to the next, in time saying how 'this candidate is going to win'. I think we are up to about eight different candidates getting the nomination at this point.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
hoosierinhogville Dec 20 2011, 12:54 AM Post #10
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
5,812
Group:
Members
Member
#155
Joined:
February 11, 2008
HoosierLars
Dec 20 2011, 12:00 AM
Mr Gray
Dec 19 2011, 01:44 PM
hoosierinhogville
Dec 19 2011, 11:49 AM
You know in your rush to crown your newest flavor of the month you forgot to mention the two other New Hampshire polls CONDUCTED DURING THE SAME TIME FRAME that show Paul with a fairly significant lead over Huntsman.
Check it:
Rassmusen: Romney 33%, Gingrich 22%, Paul 18% Huntsman 10%

Insider Advantage: Romney 29%; Gingrich 24%; Paul 21%; Huntsman 11
Lars, you seem to be acknowledging everyone everytime they find the lead in any poll, except Paul, who has been in the lead many times in many polls....and just pulled ahead of Newt in Iowa. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/gingrich-collapses-iowa-ron-paul-surges-front/46360/
I acknowledge candidates I like. Sadly, the more I've learned about Paul in the last few months, the more I've concluded he's not fit for the job of President. He has a solid 5-7% base, but unless his anti-war, pot smoking, government conspiracy theorist following increases, I don't see how he gets the nomination. All of the other candidates share his general view of reducing the size and scope of the Federal government, so he doesn't have much to offer, IMO.
I am curious to know what it is that you have learned about him in the last couple months that makes you think he is unfit to be President.
Are these actual legit, concrete facts that you have just now found out about him, or are you just gonna parrot some neo-con Fox News talking points.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
hoosierinhogville Dec 20 2011, 12:57 AM Post #11
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
5,812
Group:
Members
Member
#155
Joined:
February 11, 2008
HoosierLars
Dec 20 2011, 12:00 AM
All of the other candidates share his general view of reducing the size and scope of the Federal government, so he doesn't have much to offer, IMO.
No they don't. They just say that.

edit - except for Gary Johnson. Who I am sure you would never vote for because he smoked pot and "doesn't have a chance to win"
Edited by hoosierinhogville, Dec 20 2011, 01:07 AM.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
brumdog44 Dec 20 2011, 01:00 AM Post #12
Member Avatar
The guy picked last in gym class
Posts:
43,823
Group:
Members
Member
#181
Joined:
February 20, 2008
hoosierinhogville
Dec 20 2011, 12:54 AM
HoosierLars
Dec 20 2011, 12:00 AM
Mr Gray
Dec 19 2011, 01:44 PM
hoosierinhogville
Dec 19 2011, 11:49 AM
You know in your rush to crown your newest flavor of the month you forgot to mention the two other New Hampshire polls CONDUCTED DURING THE SAME TIME FRAME that show Paul with a fairly significant lead over Huntsman.
Check it:
Rassmusen: Romney 33%, Gingrich 22%, Paul 18% Huntsman 10%

Insider Advantage: Romney 29%; Gingrich 24%; Paul 21%; Huntsman 11
Lars, you seem to be acknowledging everyone everytime they find the lead in any poll, except Paul, who has been in the lead many times in many polls....and just pulled ahead of Newt in Iowa. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/gingrich-collapses-iowa-ron-paul-surges-front/46360/
I acknowledge candidates I like. Sadly, the more I've learned about Paul in the last few months, the more I've concluded he's not fit for the job of President. He has a solid 5-7% base, but unless his anti-war, pot smoking, government conspiracy theorist following increases, I don't see how he gets the nomination. All of the other candidates share his general view of reducing the size and scope of the Federal government, so he doesn't have much to offer, IMO.
I am curious to know what it is that you have learned about him in the last couple months that makes you think he is unfit to be President.
Are these actual legit, concrete facts that you have just now found out about him, or are you just gonna parrot some neo-con Fox News talking points.
I'd rather know what he learned in the last couple of days about Huntsman -- a guy he hadn't mentioned at all -- to think he has a chance of getting his own family to vote him, much less win the primary.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
hoosierinhogville Dec 20 2011, 01:12 AM Post #13
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
5,812
Group:
Members
Member
#155
Joined:
February 11, 2008
brumdog44
Dec 20 2011, 01:00 AM
hoosierinhogville
Dec 20 2011, 12:54 AM
HoosierLars
Dec 20 2011, 12:00 AM
Mr Gray
Dec 19 2011, 01:44 PM
hoosierinhogville
Dec 19 2011, 11:49 AM
You know in your rush to crown your newest flavor of the month you forgot to mention the two other New Hampshire polls CONDUCTED DURING THE SAME TIME FRAME that show Paul with a fairly significant lead over Huntsman.
Check it:
Rassmusen: Romney 33%, Gingrich 22%, Paul 18% Huntsman 10%

Insider Advantage: Romney 29%; Gingrich 24%; Paul 21%; Huntsman 11
Lars, you seem to be acknowledging everyone everytime they find the lead in any poll, except Paul, who has been in the lead many times in many polls....and just pulled ahead of Newt in Iowa. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/gingrich-collapses-iowa-ron-paul-surges-front/46360/
I acknowledge candidates I like. Sadly, the more I've learned about Paul in the last few months, the more I've concluded he's not fit for the job of President. He has a solid 5-7% base, but unless his anti-war, pot smoking, government conspiracy theorist following increases, I don't see how he gets the nomination. All of the other candidates share his general view of reducing the size and scope of the Federal government, so he doesn't have much to offer, IMO.
I am curious to know what it is that you have learned about him in the last couple months that makes you think he is unfit to be President.
Are these actual legit, concrete facts that you have just now found out about him, or are you just gonna parrot some neo-con Fox News talking points.
I'd rather know what he learned in the last couple of days about Huntsman -- a guy he hadn't mentioned at all -- to think he has a chance of getting his own family to vote him, much less win the primary.
Touche.

His family might not even get a chance to vote for him anyway. Huntsman is having a hard time raising money. He won't be a factor in Iowa, and if he can't finish in the top 3 in New Hampshire, he has nothing to hang his hat on. In other words, if he doesn't finish on the top 3 in New hampshire he is done. By the time the Washington State primary rolls around in early March there is a good chance Huntsman won't even be in the race anymore.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mr Gray Dec 20 2011, 07:49 AM Post #14
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
16,503
Group:
Members
Member
#26
Joined:
February 5, 2008
hoosierinhogville
Dec 20 2011, 12:57 AM
HoosierLars
Dec 20 2011, 12:00 AM
All of the other candidates share his general view of reducing the size and scope of the Federal government, so he doesn't have much to offer, IMO.
No they don't. They just say that.

edit - except for Gary Johnson. Who I am sure you would never vote for because he smoked pot and "doesn't have a chance to win"
agreed, with the likely additional exception of Bachman, I just don't see anything in anyone else's resume that says they would decrease the size of the Federal Government....ESPECIALLY Newt. I suppose you could make a case for Pawlenty, but I'm not sure he's a real candidate at this point.

Lars, you have a problem with Paul's view on making Marijuana a state issue, or are you just reciting the "pot smoking" line from establishment media? Paul is not anti-war....he is anti-occupy the world. You should read some of his books on the subject instead of making your opinion based on soundbites from Rush and Glenn. Paul would ensure our national safety as much or MORE than any candidate on the stage right now...zero doubt about it. Think of it like "Karate"....do the best fighters in the world have to defend themselves by proactively beating everyone up?
Posted Image
The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
HoosierLars Dec 20 2011, 11:08 AM Post #15
Member Avatar
3 in a row
Posts:
22,916
Group:
Members
Member
#20
Joined:
February 5, 2008
brumdog44
Dec 20 2011, 12:28 AM
No single national poll has Paul in the 5 to 7 % range.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-1452.html

OF COURSE he isn't getting the nomination. But your opinion of candidates has from day one clouded your opinion of their chance to win, which is probably why you have said a ridiculous jump from one candidate to the next, in time saying how 'this candidate is going to win'. I think we are up to about eight different candidates getting the nomination at this point.
Paul has been a professional presidential candidate for many years. Here's his polling during the 2008 primary:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-192.html

Paul's isolationist view of foreign policy is very dangerous, IMO, and his anti-Fed rhetoric plays well with the truthers. I wouldn't say he's bat-shit crazy, but seeing him in action at a couple of debates has made it clear to me that he isn't fit for the top job in the land.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
Learn More · Sign-up Now
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Politics · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • …
  • 5

Track Topic · E-mail Topic Time: 7:51 PM Jul 10
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy