Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Welcome to Our Hoosier Board! Most of the posters here have been around for nearly a decade now. You'll find their knowledge and insight to be second to none. We have a really strong community and value everyone's opinions. Feel free to jump into any thread and voice your opinion with conviction. We love heated debates and even some fanbase ribbing from time to time. We pride ourselves on the lack of moderation needed to make this board successful. Please remember that we have been around many years and have an astute ability to tell the difference between an immature, childish, trash-talking troll and a passionate fan voicing his or her opinion. It is at the discretion of Jazen and myself whether any moderating actions should be taken at any given time. It's a very, very rare thing. In other words, no worries....you'll be fine! Cheers, sirbrianwilson Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| bg | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 29 2011, 11:05 PM (151 Views) | |
| BTown11 | Dec 31 2011, 12:37 AM Post #16 |
|
Mer
|
this. she is probably a nice person, even if she is in denial about her gay husband, but she clearly has no business running for president. if she had run in her "home state" of Minnesota she would have lost badly. I'm not sure if it's more possible for a politician to be more hated in their own territory.. |
| Death to Signatures. | |
![]() |
|
| IUCOLTFAN | Dec 31 2011, 09:11 AM Post #17 |
|
Coach
|
Al Gore |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| IUCOLTFAN | Dec 31 2011, 09:15 AM Post #18 |
|
Coach
|
Didn't Paul get a provision added to the healthcare bill to audit the Fed? I'm pretty sure it is limited but I think he had a provision added somewhere.....it's a start. Hopefully people get a small glimpse of what is going on and a full audit will follow.......a man can dream ya know. |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| Mr Gray | Dec 31 2011, 09:35 AM Post #19 |
![]()
Coach
|
wait...we still think Bachman's husband is gay because he used a gay voice in a comical manner? I guess Chris Rock and Adam Sandler are gay also. |
![]() The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism. | |
![]() |
|
| HoosierLars | Jan 1 2012, 11:48 PM Post #20 |
![]()
3 in a row
|
If you hadn't flip-flopped on your Paul support, you would have been a former liberal voting for a conservative, clearly a "neo-con" using definition 1. :owned: |
| |
![]() |
|
| Mr Gray | Jan 2 2012, 09:09 AM Post #21 |
![]()
Coach
|
brum flipp-flopped on Paul? |
![]() The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism. | |
![]() |
|
| brumdog44 | Jan 2 2012, 09:57 AM Post #22 |
![]()
The guy picked last in gym class
|
I said that I wouldn't vote for him for president at this point, but still thought he was a very intelligent man who was right on most issues. In Lars' world, jumping in bed with every flavor of the day in a primary isn't flip-flopping, so I'm not too worried about his definition. Anyway, what Lars doesn't understand because of his blind hatred for Paul is that Paul is a libertarian which, by nature, is NOT conservative on all (in fact, MANY) issues. Paul is an economic conservative with views that are mostly socially and militarily liberal. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Mr Gray | Jan 2 2012, 10:06 AM Post #23 |
![]()
Coach
|
oh...I must have missed that. What is it that would prevent you from voting for him for President? |
![]() The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism. | |
![]() |
|
| boilergrad01 | Jan 2 2012, 10:49 AM Post #24 |
|
Working on the last 5
|
1. He is unelectable 2. His Foreign Policy 3. I disagree with him on many issues |
| Nothing beats an Astronaut | |
![]() |
|
| Mr Gray | Jan 2 2012, 11:05 AM Post #25 |
![]()
Coach
|
i love the paradox of not voting for someone because they are "unelectable"......it's like saying you can't win a basketball game because you can't win a basketball game. |
![]() The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism. | |
![]() |
|
| chops1221 | Jan 2 2012, 12:22 PM Post #26 |
|
Coach
|
Perhaps BG is in primary mode. Otherwise yeah... |
| |
![]() |
|
| HoosierLars | Jan 2 2012, 12:55 PM Post #27 |
![]()
3 in a row
|
I posted some of Paul's position from his own website, and Brum admitted he couldn't support him. It was pretty funny. I was always amused by how Brum is clearly a big government guy, yet he claimed to support some guy who wants to eliminate many government cabinet level departments. LOL |
| |
![]() |
|
| HoosierLars | Jan 2 2012, 12:56 PM Post #28 |
![]()
3 in a row
|
Chops, can you see yourself voting for Paul? |
| |
![]() |
|
| brumdog44 | Jan 2 2012, 06:27 PM Post #29 |
![]()
The guy picked last in gym class
|
Those reasons sure as hell aren't that I would give. The funny thing is that one of the main reasons I said that I couldn't support him was never mentioned by Lars (whom, BTW, should have truly been the one given the black and white label since everything to him is a prepackaged D or R issue). He believes that juries should act as tribunals and not only judge the case, but judge the law as well. I've seen some pretty damn ridiculous conclusions reached by juries who were supposed to be acting within the confines of the law -- can't imagine what we would see if they were told they did not have to. I also disagree with some of his positions in making things like pollution laws left up to individual states...I've yet to see the air in one state stay in that state. |
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community. Learn More · Sign-up Now |
|
| « Previous Topic · Politics · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
7:52 PM Jul 10
|












7:52 PM Jul 10