|
If there is such a liberal media bias...
|
|
Topic Started: Jan 27 2012, 10:31 PM (295 Views)
|
|
brumdog44
|
Feb 6 2012, 07:34 PM
Post #46
|
The guy picked last in gym class
- Posts:
- 43,823
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #181
- Joined:
- February 20, 2008
|
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:51 AM
the "conservative media"....who the hell is that eel? I know for a fact that Beck covered it extensively, as well as just about every other liberal comment from Newt, and I would be willing to bet just about anything that Limbaugh covered it. My point is simple Eel...the media itself is the "liberal media"...they are one in the same, so of course this comment wasn't covered outside of the above reference outlets. So you've heard of one person that covered it...which means that it was covered by conservative outlets.
I think I see the real bias here.
|
|
| |
|
chops1221
|
Feb 6 2012, 08:19 PM
Post #47
|
Coach
- Posts:
- 3,802
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #28
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:51 AM
- eelbor
- Feb 6 2012, 10:43 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:13 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 2 2012, 09:24 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 1 2012, 11:11 AM
- brumdog44
- Feb 1 2012, 12:10 AM
Drilled so hard that you had no clue about the statement being made. Yeah, absolutely nailed to the wall.
brum, I have a question for you. Why would the liberal media point out Newt's comment? In order to do so, wouldn't they either have to imply that there is something wrong with his statement or actually agree with him? A liberal wouldn't be inclined to do either of those choices, which is likely why his comments were ignored by the media, which is mostly liberal.
bump to brum
brum....nothing wrong with just admitting your error here.
Not to defned Brum, but you are asking the wrong question. The question you should be yourself yourself is why did the conservative media NOT jump all over the comment?
the "conservative media"....who the hell is that eel? I know for a fact that Beck covered it extensively, as well as just about every other liberal comment from Newt, and I would be willing to bet just about anything that Limbaugh covered it. My point is simple Eel...the media itself is the "liberal media"...they are one in the same, so of course this comment wasn't covered outside of the above reference outlets. The most watched 24-hour news channel is not part of the "liberal media". Did they cover it?
I don't watch cable news very often so they may have; I honestly have no idea.
Actually I don't even really care if they did. Why did I jump into this conversation?
I might be brain dead from working on my thesis.
|
|
| |
|
eelbor
|
Feb 6 2012, 09:36 PM
Post #48
|
Zen Master
- Posts:
- 10,606
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #30
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- chops1221
- Feb 6 2012, 08:19 PM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:51 AM
- eelbor
- Feb 6 2012, 10:43 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:13 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 2 2012, 09:24 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 1 2012, 11:11 AM
- brumdog44
- Feb 1 2012, 12:10 AM
Drilled so hard that you had no clue about the statement being made. Yeah, absolutely nailed to the wall.
brum, I have a question for you. Why would the liberal media point out Newt's comment? In order to do so, wouldn't they either have to imply that there is something wrong with his statement or actually agree with him? A liberal wouldn't be inclined to do either of those choices, which is likely why his comments were ignored by the media, which is mostly liberal.
bump to brum
brum....nothing wrong with just admitting your error here.
Not to defned Brum, but you are asking the wrong question. The question you should be yourself yourself is why did the conservative media NOT jump all over the comment?
the "conservative media"....who the hell is that eel? I know for a fact that Beck covered it extensively, as well as just about every other liberal comment from Newt, and I would be willing to bet just about anything that Limbaugh covered it. My point is simple Eel...the media itself is the "liberal media"...they are one in the same, so of course this comment wasn't covered outside of the above reference outlets.
The most watched 24-hour news channel is not part of the "liberal media". Did they cover it? I don't watch cable news very often so they may have; I honestly have no idea. Actually I don't even really care if they did. Why did I jump into this conversation? I might be brain dead from working on my thesis. What is your thesis on, maybe the board can offer our opinions on the subject. :)
|

"Liberal, shmiberal. That should be a new word. Shmiberal: one who is assumed liberal, just because he's a professional whiner in the newspaper. If you'll read the subtext for many of those old strips, you'll find the heart of an old-fashioned Libertarian. And I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners." - Berkeley Breathed
Meat is Murder. Sweet, delicious murder.
|
| |
|
chops1221
|
Feb 6 2012, 10:18 PM
Post #49
|
Coach
- Posts:
- 3,802
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #28
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- eelbor
- Feb 6 2012, 09:36 PM
- chops1221
- Feb 6 2012, 08:19 PM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:51 AM
- eelbor
- Feb 6 2012, 10:43 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:13 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 2 2012, 09:24 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 1 2012, 11:11 AM
- brumdog44
- Feb 1 2012, 12:10 AM
Drilled so hard that you had no clue about the statement being made. Yeah, absolutely nailed to the wall.
brum, I have a question for you. Why would the liberal media point out Newt's comment? In order to do so, wouldn't they either have to imply that there is something wrong with his statement or actually agree with him? A liberal wouldn't be inclined to do either of those choices, which is likely why his comments were ignored by the media, which is mostly liberal.
bump to brum
brum....nothing wrong with just admitting your error here.
Not to defned Brum, but you are asking the wrong question. The question you should be yourself yourself is why did the conservative media NOT jump all over the comment?
the "conservative media"....who the hell is that eel? I know for a fact that Beck covered it extensively, as well as just about every other liberal comment from Newt, and I would be willing to bet just about anything that Limbaugh covered it. My point is simple Eel...the media itself is the "liberal media"...they are one in the same, so of course this comment wasn't covered outside of the above reference outlets.
The most watched 24-hour news channel is not part of the "liberal media". Did they cover it? I don't watch cable news very often so they may have; I honestly have no idea. Actually I don't even really care if they did. Why did I jump into this conversation? I might be brain dead from working on my thesis.
What is your thesis on, maybe the board can offer our opinions on the subject. :) analyzing conceptual understanding of parallel computing
|
|
| |
|
HoosierLars
|
Feb 6 2012, 10:29 PM
Post #50
|
3 in a row
- Posts:
- 22,916
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #20
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- chops1221
- Feb 6 2012, 10:18 PM
- eelbor
- Feb 6 2012, 09:36 PM
- chops1221
- Feb 6 2012, 08:19 PM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:51 AM
- eelbor
- Feb 6 2012, 10:43 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:13 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 2 2012, 09:24 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 1 2012, 11:11 AM
- brumdog44
- Feb 1 2012, 12:10 AM
Drilled so hard that you had no clue about the statement being made. Yeah, absolutely nailed to the wall.
brum, I have a question for you. Why would the liberal media point out Newt's comment? In order to do so, wouldn't they either have to imply that there is something wrong with his statement or actually agree with him? A liberal wouldn't be inclined to do either of those choices, which is likely why his comments were ignored by the media, which is mostly liberal.
bump to brum
brum....nothing wrong with just admitting your error here.
Not to defned Brum, but you are asking the wrong question. The question you should be yourself yourself is why did the conservative media NOT jump all over the comment?
the "conservative media"....who the hell is that eel? I know for a fact that Beck covered it extensively, as well as just about every other liberal comment from Newt, and I would be willing to bet just about anything that Limbaugh covered it. My point is simple Eel...the media itself is the "liberal media"...they are one in the same, so of course this comment wasn't covered outside of the above reference outlets.
The most watched 24-hour news channel is not part of the "liberal media". Did they cover it? I don't watch cable news very often so they may have; I honestly have no idea. Actually I don't even really care if they did. Why did I jump into this conversation? I might be brain dead from working on my thesis.
What is your thesis on, maybe the board can offer our opinions on the subject. :)
analyzing conceptual understanding of parallel computing Great topic. If I'm posting less the next few months, it's because I'm responsible for rewriting a large code to be scalable using MPI.
|
|
| |
|
chops1221
|
Feb 6 2012, 10:38 PM
Post #51
|
Coach
- Posts:
- 3,802
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #28
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- HoosierLars
- Feb 6 2012, 10:29 PM
- chops1221
- Feb 6 2012, 10:18 PM
- eelbor
- Feb 6 2012, 09:36 PM
- chops1221
- Feb 6 2012, 08:19 PM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:51 AM
- eelbor
- Feb 6 2012, 10:43 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:13 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 2 2012, 09:24 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 1 2012, 11:11 AM
- brumdog44
- Feb 1 2012, 12:10 AM
Drilled so hard that you had no clue about the statement being made. Yeah, absolutely nailed to the wall.
brum, I have a question for you. Why would the liberal media point out Newt's comment? In order to do so, wouldn't they either have to imply that there is something wrong with his statement or actually agree with him? A liberal wouldn't be inclined to do either of those choices, which is likely why his comments were ignored by the media, which is mostly liberal.
bump to brum
brum....nothing wrong with just admitting your error here.
Not to defned Brum, but you are asking the wrong question. The question you should be yourself yourself is why did the conservative media NOT jump all over the comment?
the "conservative media"....who the hell is that eel? I know for a fact that Beck covered it extensively, as well as just about every other liberal comment from Newt, and I would be willing to bet just about anything that Limbaugh covered it. My point is simple Eel...the media itself is the "liberal media"...they are one in the same, so of course this comment wasn't covered outside of the above reference outlets.
The most watched 24-hour news channel is not part of the "liberal media". Did they cover it? I don't watch cable news very often so they may have; I honestly have no idea. Actually I don't even really care if they did. Why did I jump into this conversation? I might be brain dead from working on my thesis.
What is your thesis on, maybe the board can offer our opinions on the subject. :)
analyzing conceptual understanding of parallel computing
Great topic. If I'm posting less the next few months, it's because I'm responsible for rewriting a large code to be scalable using MPI. I almost went with an examination into alignment of industry and academic trajectories in parallel computing. I probably would have tried to interview you if I had done that.
But then I would have probably had to bash you on the head with Darwin's On the Origin of Species, so maybe it's a good thing that didn't happen. :P
Also good luck with that project. Writing scalable code for distributed memory machines is no fun.
|
|
| |
|
Mr Gray
|
Feb 6 2012, 11:31 PM
Post #52
|
Coach
- Posts:
- 16,503
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #26
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- chops1221
- Feb 6 2012, 08:19 PM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:51 AM
- eelbor
- Feb 6 2012, 10:43 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:13 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 2 2012, 09:24 AM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 1 2012, 11:11 AM
- brumdog44
- Feb 1 2012, 12:10 AM
Drilled so hard that you had no clue about the statement being made. Yeah, absolutely nailed to the wall.
brum, I have a question for you. Why would the liberal media point out Newt's comment? In order to do so, wouldn't they either have to imply that there is something wrong with his statement or actually agree with him? A liberal wouldn't be inclined to do either of those choices, which is likely why his comments were ignored by the media, which is mostly liberal.
bump to brum
brum....nothing wrong with just admitting your error here.
Not to defned Brum, but you are asking the wrong question. The question you should be yourself yourself is why did the conservative media NOT jump all over the comment?
the "conservative media"....who the hell is that eel? I know for a fact that Beck covered it extensively, as well as just about every other liberal comment from Newt, and I would be willing to bet just about anything that Limbaugh covered it. My point is simple Eel...the media itself is the "liberal media"...they are one in the same, so of course this comment wasn't covered outside of the above reference outlets.
The most watched 24-hour news channel is not part of the "liberal media". Did they cover it? I don't watch cable news very often so they may have; I honestly have no idea. Actually I don't even really care if they did. Why did I jump into this conversation? I might be brain dead from working on my thesis. I have no idea...I haven't watched Fox News in a long time.
|
 The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
|
| |
|
Mr Gray
|
Feb 6 2012, 11:31 PM
Post #53
|
Coach
- Posts:
- 16,503
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #26
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- brumdog44
- Feb 6 2012, 07:34 PM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:51 AM
the "conservative media"....who the hell is that eel? I know for a fact that Beck covered it extensively, as well as just about every other liberal comment from Newt, and I would be willing to bet just about anything that Limbaugh covered it. My point is simple Eel...the media itself is the "liberal media"...they are one in the same, so of course this comment wasn't covered outside of the above reference outlets.
So you've heard of one person that covered it...which means that it was covered by conservative outlets. I think I see the real bias here. who are the "conservative outlets", and are they the same as the previously mentioned "conservative media"?
Edited by Mr Gray, Feb 6 2012, 11:31 PM.
|
 The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
|
| |
|
chops1221
|
Feb 6 2012, 11:37 PM
Post #54
|
Coach
- Posts:
- 3,802
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #28
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 11:31 PM
- brumdog44
- Feb 6 2012, 07:34 PM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:51 AM
the "conservative media"....who the hell is that eel? I know for a fact that Beck covered it extensively, as well as just about every other liberal comment from Newt, and I would be willing to bet just about anything that Limbaugh covered it. My point is simple Eel...the media itself is the "liberal media"...they are one in the same, so of course this comment wasn't covered outside of the above reference outlets.
So you've heard of one person that covered it...which means that it was covered by conservative outlets. I think I see the real bias here.
who are the "conservative outlets", and are they the same as the previously mentioned "conservative media"? Fox would be a good place to start.
|
|
| |
|
Mr Gray
|
Feb 7 2012, 08:05 AM
Post #55
|
Coach
- Posts:
- 16,503
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #26
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- chops1221
- Feb 6 2012, 11:37 PM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 11:31 PM
- brumdog44
- Feb 6 2012, 07:34 PM
- Mr Gray
- Feb 6 2012, 10:51 AM
the "conservative media"....who the hell is that eel? I know for a fact that Beck covered it extensively, as well as just about every other liberal comment from Newt, and I would be willing to bet just about anything that Limbaugh covered it. My point is simple Eel...the media itself is the "liberal media"...they are one in the same, so of course this comment wasn't covered outside of the above reference outlets.
So you've heard of one person that covered it...which means that it was covered by conservative outlets. I think I see the real bias here.
who are the "conservative outlets", and are they the same as the previously mentioned "conservative media"?
Fox would be a good place to start. I think it might start and stop there. ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, HLN, MSNBC, NYT, USA Today, LAT, Washington Times, Chicago Tribune.....those are all of the big ones anyway, and they are all definitely slanted to the left, some heavily.
|
 The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
|
| |
|
HoosierLars
|
Feb 7 2012, 10:24 AM
Post #56
|
3 in a row
- Posts:
- 22,916
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #20
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- chops1221
- Feb 6 2012, 10:38 PM
I almost went with an examination into alignment of industry and academic trajectories in parallel computing. I probably would have tried to interview you if I had done that. But then I would have probably had to bash you on the head with Darwin's On the Origin of Species, so maybe it's a good thing that didn't happen. :P Also good luck with that project. Writing scalable code for distributed memory machines is no fun. I work with a guy who's read multiple books about evolution, and he's very knowledgeable on the topic. I'll be sure to post here if I ever have an Aha moment and change my overall opinion on the topic.
My previous parallel work with using OpenMP (shared memory). The obvious advantage of MPI is you don't need to deal with strange memory corruption problems. We've developed utilities to stream objects between processors, which takes some of the drudgery out of the work. This application needs to scale to 128 processors and beyond, and problem size (total memory required) is equally as important as wall clock run-time. Some users have problems that require > 1Tb of total memory to run.
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|