Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Welcome to Our Hoosier Board! Most of the posters here have been around for nearly a decade now. You'll find their knowledge and insight to be second to none. We have a really strong community and value everyone's opinions. Feel free to jump into any thread and voice your opinion with conviction. We love heated debates and even some fanbase ribbing from time to time. We pride ourselves on the lack of moderation needed to make this board successful. Please remember that we have been around many years and have an astute ability to tell the difference between an immature, childish, trash-talking troll and a passionate fan voicing his or her opinion. It is at the discretion of Jazen and myself whether any moderating actions should be taken at any given time. It's a very, very rare thing. In other words, no worries....you'll be fine! Cheers, sirbrianwilson Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| No health insurance? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 27 2013, 06:53 AM (337 Views) | |
| dreachon | Aug 1 2013, 09:34 AM Post #16 |
|
Creative Title Here
|
I want to say that I am totally with you guys on the fact that an ACA call center switching positions from full-time to part-time in order to avoid paying healthcare costs is obvious hypocrisy. I've stated that already. I'm just pointing out that for all that people complain on here about "playing politics", this is a perfect example. Because if the call center hires more staff than they need or gives health benefits to part time employees or whatever, the cost of that call center is going to be highlighted in order to bash the ACA or the Obama administration. There's no solution to this where Colt doesn't post an article complaining about this call center. |
| |
![]() |
|
| HoosierLars | Aug 1 2013, 10:55 AM Post #17 |
![]()
3 in a row
|
The solution is to actually implement policies that improve health care and reduce costs, e.g. tort reform and allowing open insurance competition to eliminate any excessive profits. |
| |
![]() |
|
| dreachon | Aug 1 2013, 11:06 AM Post #18 |
|
Creative Title Here
|
Obviously I was speaking of a solution the call center's hiring procedures, not to American healthcare. |
| |
![]() |
|
| brumdog44 | Aug 1 2013, 11:10 AM Post #19 |
![]()
The guy picked last in gym class
|
I said exactly that --that they hired part timers to avoid paying insurance costs. Re-read my post. Dreach said the same thing. So stop with the 'hopelessly committed to Obama' lines. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Mr Gray | Aug 1 2013, 11:16 AM Post #20 |
![]()
Coach
|
you're right...although you did provide some level of justification for this action, my comment was mostly directed at dreach. |
![]() The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism. | |
![]() |
|
| dreachon | Aug 1 2013, 11:23 AM Post #21 |
|
Creative Title Here
|
Um. Ok. |
| |
![]() |
|
| brumdog44 | Aug 1 2013, 11:28 AM Post #22 |
![]()
The guy picked last in gym class
|
Dreach's point was that it is a story against Obamacare whether they hire part timers or full timers because it either shows hypocrisy or wasteful spending. I'm not sure how that is an example of ardent support of Obama. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Mr Gray | Aug 1 2013, 11:31 AM Post #23 |
![]()
Coach
|
that's BS...if it shows "wasteful spending" then that is even a worse indictment of Obamacare, because it implies that spending on healthcare is wasteful. |
![]() The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism. | |
![]() |
|
| brumdog44 | Aug 1 2013, 11:36 AM Post #24 |
![]()
The guy picked last in gym class
|
WHICH IS WHAT I'M SAYING. Both ways it is a strike against it. |
| |
![]() |
|
| dreachon | Aug 1 2013, 11:40 AM Post #25 |
|
Creative Title Here
|
THANK YOU for making my point. |
| |
![]() |
|
| IUCOLTFAN | Aug 2 2013, 12:34 PM Post #26 |
|
Coach
|
I don't care if its full-time, part-time, minimum wage, needed, not-needed, etc.....IF you are doing something to advert your own law (one that is so great), preach about healthcare for all and totally demagogue the issue, have to balls to offer healthcare and stand up for your principles that you CLAIM to have. Shouldn't matters if others think its wasteful if it is your core belief and the ACA is your crowning accomplishment. The problem is, IMO, that the ACA wasn't about healthcare for all......this helps prove that. |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| HoosierLars | Aug 2 2013, 12:50 PM Post #27 |
![]()
3 in a row
|
The ACA was designed to blow-up the private system and lead to a government takeover. Obama and other Dems were clear about wanting a single-payer government system, but couldn't pass that. This is why they were so desperate to pass ANYTHING. |
| |
![]() |
|
| IUCOLTFAN | Aug 2 2013, 01:13 PM Post #28 |
|
Coach
|
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/08/01/Report-Lawmakers-Congressional-Aides-to-Get-Obamacare-Exemptions Wow. The gift that keeps on giving. |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| IUCOLTFAN | Aug 7 2013, 05:11 PM Post #29 |
|
Coach
|
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/07/us-usa-health-congress-idUSBRE9760YL20130807? Sweet! How much more unpopular does this make the law? What's good enough for you is not good enough for congress and their staff members. Amazing... |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| IUCOLTFAN | Aug 7 2013, 05:15 PM Post #30 |
|
Coach
|
http://money.cnn.com/2013/08/06/news/economy/obamacare-premiums/index.html |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
7:56 PM Jul 10
|












7:56 PM Jul 10