|
The terror attack thread
|
|
Topic Started: Jul 14 2016, 09:41 PM (482 Views)
|
|
Mr Gray
|
Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM
Post #16
|
Coach
- Posts:
- 16,503
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #26
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 09:40 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 07:27 AM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 06:37 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 05:57 AM
Ban cars.
Definitely no point in doing things to try and prevent more gun violence when we still have cars. Amiright?
Is that what I said?
Make a sarcastic post, get a sarcastic response.
Sarcastic? Yes. Relevant? Yes. Are you blaming truck manufacturers and the lack of background checks on truck sales for this tragedy?
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right? trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4 What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive. I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't. From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct?
|
 The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
|
| |
|
dreachon
|
Jul 15 2016, 03:57 PM
Post #17
|
Creative Title Here
- Posts:
- 24,068
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #148
- Joined:
- February 10, 2008
|
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 09:40 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 07:27 AM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 06:37 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 05:57 AM
Ban cars.
Definitely no point in doing things to try and prevent more gun violence when we still have cars. Amiright?
Is that what I said?
Make a sarcastic post, get a sarcastic response.
Sarcastic? Yes. Relevant? Yes. Are you blaming truck manufacturers and the lack of background checks on truck sales for this tragedy?
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right? trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4 What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive. I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't.
From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct? Yeah. Though I'm not sure what kind of background check (if any) is used before giving someone a license. I would hope they make sure the person isn't out on probation for DUI or something like that.
|
|
| |
|
Mr Gray
|
Jul 15 2016, 04:02 PM
Post #18
|
Coach
- Posts:
- 16,503
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #26
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 03:57 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 09:40 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 07:27 AM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 06:37 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 05:57 AM
Ban cars.
Definitely no point in doing things to try and prevent more gun violence when we still have cars. Amiright?
Is that what I said?
Make a sarcastic post, get a sarcastic response.
Sarcastic? Yes. Relevant? Yes. Are you blaming truck manufacturers and the lack of background checks on truck sales for this tragedy?
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right? trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4 What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive. I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't.
From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct?
Yeah. Though I'm not sure what kind of background check (if any) is used before giving someone a license. I would hope they make sure the person isn't out on probation for DUI or something like that. So you are ok with potential violent felons, mentally ill, or domestic terrorists purchasing these vehicles that can be used irresponsibly to harm and kill so many innocent lives........without giving them a background check? Not even forcing them to be properly trained on the vehicle as to avoid an accidental death or injury? Why dreach?
|
 The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
|
| |
|
dreachon
|
Jul 15 2016, 04:09 PM
Post #19
|
Creative Title Here
- Posts:
- 24,068
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #148
- Joined:
- February 10, 2008
|
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 04:02 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 03:57 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 09:40 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 07:27 AM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 06:37 AM
Quoting limited to 10 levels deep
Is that what I said?
Make a sarcastic post, get a sarcastic response.
Sarcastic? Yes. Relevant? Yes. Are you blaming truck manufacturers and the lack of background checks on truck sales for this tragedy?
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right? trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4 What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive. I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't.
From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct?
Yeah. Though I'm not sure what kind of background check (if any) is used before giving someone a license. I would hope they make sure the person isn't out on probation for DUI or something like that.
So you are ok with potential violent felons, mentally ill, or domestic terrorists purchasing these vehicles that can be used irresponsibly to harm and kill so many innocent lives........without giving them a background check? Not even forcing them to be properly trained on the vehicle as to avoid an accidental death or injury? Why dreach? Boy. Couldn't see this coming at all. :ermm:
What do you mean not forcing them to be properly trained? Have to have a license to drive a car. That's forced training. And since all cars should have to be registered, then I'm not sure what scenario there is where someone doesn't have to go through the basic checks.
But regardless of any of that. I'll point to a previous posts that makes your entire "gotcha!" attempt moot.
- Quote:
-
trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4
What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
http://s15.zetaboards.com/Our_Hoosier_Board/single/?p=8387725&t=8505244
I have absolutely zero qualms with requiring more stringent methods to acquire guns than cars. They're not the same thing. I don't think they have to be treated the same way.
|
|
| |
|
brumdog44
|
Jul 15 2016, 04:38 PM
Post #20
|
The guy picked last in gym class
- Posts:
- 43,823
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #181
- Joined:
- February 20, 2008
|
Posted Image
|
|
| |
|
sirbrianwilson
|
Jul 15 2016, 05:11 PM
Post #21
|
Stemlerite
- Posts:
- 22,404
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #1
- Joined:
- February 4, 2008
|
this analogy is so played out...and shitty.
br
|

|
| |
|
mongo
|
Jul 15 2016, 07:42 PM
Post #22
|
Coach
- Posts:
- 11,595
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #160
- Joined:
- February 12, 2008
|
- brumdog44
- Jul 15 2016, 10:24 AM
Cars and guns aren't the same.
We actually require people to take a test in order to be able to use a car. Love
|

"Son, if you really want something in this life you have to work hard for it. Now quiet! They're about to announce the lottery numbers."
|
| |
|
Mr Gray
|
Jul 15 2016, 07:46 PM
Post #23
|
Coach
- Posts:
- 16,503
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #26
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 04:09 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 04:02 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 03:57 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 09:40 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 07:27 AM
Quoting limited to 10 levels deep
Make a sarcastic post, get a sarcastic response.
Sarcastic? Yes. Relevant? Yes. Are you blaming truck manufacturers and the lack of background checks on truck sales for this tragedy?
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right? trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4 What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive. I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't.
From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct?
Yeah. Though I'm not sure what kind of background check (if any) is used before giving someone a license. I would hope they make sure the person isn't out on probation for DUI or something like that.
So you are ok with potential violent felons, mentally ill, or domestic terrorists purchasing these vehicles that can be used irresponsibly to harm and kill so many innocent lives........without giving them a background check? Not even forcing them to be properly trained on the vehicle as to avoid an accidental death or injury? Why dreach?
Boy. Couldn't see this coming at all. :ermm: What do you mean not forcing them to be properly trained? Have to have a license to drive a car. That's forced training. And since all cars should have to be registered, then I'm not sure what scenario there is where someone doesn't have to go through the basic checks. But regardless of any of that. I'll point to a previous posts that makes your entire "gotcha!" attempt moot. - Quote:
-
trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4
What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else. http://s15.zetaboards.com/Our_Hoosier_Board/single/?p=8387725&t=8505244I have absolutely zero qualms with requiring more stringent methods to acquire guns than cars. They're not the same thing. I don't think they have to be treated the same way. You do not have to go through any checks to buy a car. All of you who are saying otherwise should be ashamed of your dishonesty.
|
 The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
|
| |
|
sirbrianwilson
|
Jul 15 2016, 07:49 PM
Post #24
|
Stemlerite
- Posts:
- 22,404
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #1
- Joined:
- February 4, 2008
|
Posted Image
|

|
| |
|
dreachon
|
Jul 15 2016, 08:11 PM
Post #25
|
Creative Title Here
- Posts:
- 24,068
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #148
- Joined:
- February 10, 2008
|
Guys, I don't know if this coup in Turkey counts as terrorism, but shit is WILD right now. Military busted into CNN Turkey, but hasn't cut the feed. Right now there is a live stream of the CNN Turkey office and you can hear the coup going on outside. Lots of shouting, chanting, gunfire, etc. Now reports that there have been several explosions at the airport. Here's the CNN Turkey stream.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO0g09LfbNQ&feature=youtu.be
|
|
| |
|
dreachon
|
Jul 15 2016, 08:48 PM
Post #26
|
Creative Title Here
- Posts:
- 24,068
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #148
- Joined:
- February 10, 2008
|
Appears as though the coup has failed.
|
|
| |
|
dreachon
|
Jul 15 2016, 09:19 PM
Post #27
|
Creative Title Here
- Posts:
- 24,068
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #148
- Joined:
- February 10, 2008
|
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 07:46 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 04:09 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 04:02 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 03:57 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 09:40 AM
Quoting limited to 10 levels deep
Sarcastic? Yes. Relevant? Yes. Are you blaming truck manufacturers and the lack of background checks on truck sales for this tragedy?
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right? trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4 What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive. I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't.
From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct?
Yeah. Though I'm not sure what kind of background check (if any) is used before giving someone a license. I would hope they make sure the person isn't out on probation for DUI or something like that.
So you are ok with potential violent felons, mentally ill, or domestic terrorists purchasing these vehicles that can be used irresponsibly to harm and kill so many innocent lives........without giving them a background check? Not even forcing them to be properly trained on the vehicle as to avoid an accidental death or injury? Why dreach?
Boy. Couldn't see this coming at all. :ermm: What do you mean not forcing them to be properly trained? Have to have a license to drive a car. That's forced training. And since all cars should have to be registered, then I'm not sure what scenario there is where someone doesn't have to go through the basic checks. But regardless of any of that. I'll point to a previous posts that makes your entire "gotcha!" attempt moot. - Quote:
-
trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4
What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else. http://s15.zetaboards.com/Our_Hoosier_Board/single/?p=8387725&t=8505244I have absolutely zero qualms with requiring more stringent methods to acquire guns than cars. They're not the same thing. I don't think they have to be treated the same way.
You do not have to go through any checks to buy a car. All of you who are saying otherwise should be ashamed of your dishonesty. Sure thing. I'll go be ashamed now.
|
|
| |
|
Mr Gray
|
Jul 15 2016, 09:40 PM
Post #28
|
Coach
- Posts:
- 16,503
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #26
- Joined:
- February 5, 2008
|
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 09:19 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 07:46 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 04:09 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 04:02 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 03:57 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
- dreachon
- Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
- Mr Gray
- Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM
Quoting limited to 10 levels deep
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right? trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4 What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive. I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't.
From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct?
Yeah. Though I'm not sure what kind of background check (if any) is used before giving someone a license. I would hope they make sure the person isn't out on probation for DUI or something like that.
So you are ok with potential violent felons, mentally ill, or domestic terrorists purchasing these vehicles that can be used irresponsibly to harm and kill so many innocent lives........without giving them a background check? Not even forcing them to be properly trained on the vehicle as to avoid an accidental death or injury? Why dreach?
Boy. Couldn't see this coming at all. :ermm: What do you mean not forcing them to be properly trained? Have to have a license to drive a car. That's forced training. And since all cars should have to be registered, then I'm not sure what scenario there is where someone doesn't have to go through the basic checks. But regardless of any of that. I'll point to a previous posts that makes your entire "gotcha!" attempt moot. - Quote:
-
trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4
What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else. http://s15.zetaboards.com/Our_Hoosier_Board/single/?p=8387725&t=8505244I have absolutely zero qualms with requiring more stringent methods to acquire guns than cars. They're not the same thing. I don't think they have to be treated the same way.
You do not have to go through any checks to buy a car. All of you who are saying otherwise should be ashamed of your dishonesty.
Sure thing. I'll go be ashamed now. Good.
|
 The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
|
| |
|
mongo
|
Jul 17 2016, 10:42 AM
Post #29
|
Coach
- Posts:
- 11,595
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #160
- Joined:
- February 12, 2008
|
Another attack this morning on police. In Baton Rouge at least 7 officers shot and 3 are dead
|

"Son, if you really want something in this life you have to work hard for it. Now quiet! They're about to announce the lottery numbers."
|
| |
|
brumdog44
|
Jul 17 2016, 11:30 AM
Post #30
|
The guy picked last in gym class
- Posts:
- 43,823
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #181
- Joined:
- February 20, 2008
|
Damn it.
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|