Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Logo
Search Members FAQ Portal
  • Navigation
  • Our Hoosier Board
  • →
  • Other
  • →
  • Politics
  • →
  • The terror attack thread
Welcome to Our Hoosier Board!

Most of the posters here have been around for nearly a decade now. You'll find their knowledge and insight to be second to none. We have a really strong community and value everyone's opinions.

Feel free to jump into any thread and voice your opinion with conviction. We love heated debates and even some fanbase ribbing from time to time. We pride ourselves on the lack of moderation needed to make this board successful.

Please remember that we have been around many years and have an astute ability to tell the difference between an immature, childish, trash-talking troll and a passionate fan voicing his or her opinion. It is at the discretion of Jazen and myself whether any moderating actions should be taken at any given time. It's a very, very rare thing. In other words, no worries....you'll be fine!

Cheers,
sirbrianwilson

Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The terror attack thread
Tweet Topic Started: Jul 14 2016, 09:41 PM (482 Views)
Mr Gray Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM Post #16
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
16,503
Group:
Members
Member
#26
Joined:
February 5, 2008
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 09:40 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 07:27 AM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 06:37 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 05:57 AM
Ban cars.
Definitely no point in doing things to try and prevent more gun violence when we still have cars. Amiright?
Is that what I said?
Make a sarcastic post, get a sarcastic response.
Sarcastic? Yes. Relevant? Yes. Are you blaming truck manufacturers and the lack of background checks on truck sales for this tragedy?
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right?

trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4

What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive.

I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't.
From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct?
Posted Image
The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dreachon Jul 15 2016, 03:57 PM Post #17
Member Avatar
Creative Title Here
Posts:
24,068
Group:
Members
Member
#148
Joined:
February 10, 2008
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 09:40 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 07:27 AM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 06:37 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 05:57 AM
Ban cars.
Definitely no point in doing things to try and prevent more gun violence when we still have cars. Amiright?
Is that what I said?
Make a sarcastic post, get a sarcastic response.
Sarcastic? Yes. Relevant? Yes. Are you blaming truck manufacturers and the lack of background checks on truck sales for this tragedy?
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right?

trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4

What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive.

I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't.
From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct?
Yeah. Though I'm not sure what kind of background check (if any) is used before giving someone a license. I would hope they make sure the person isn't out on probation for DUI or something like that.
Posted Image
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mr Gray Jul 15 2016, 04:02 PM Post #18
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
16,503
Group:
Members
Member
#26
Joined:
February 5, 2008
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 03:57 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 09:40 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 07:27 AM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 06:37 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 05:57 AM
Ban cars.
Definitely no point in doing things to try and prevent more gun violence when we still have cars. Amiright?
Is that what I said?
Make a sarcastic post, get a sarcastic response.
Sarcastic? Yes. Relevant? Yes. Are you blaming truck manufacturers and the lack of background checks on truck sales for this tragedy?
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right?

trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4

What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive.

I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't.
From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct?
Yeah. Though I'm not sure what kind of background check (if any) is used before giving someone a license. I would hope they make sure the person isn't out on probation for DUI or something like that.
So you are ok with potential violent felons, mentally ill, or domestic terrorists purchasing these vehicles that can be used irresponsibly to harm and kill so many innocent lives........without giving them a background check? Not even forcing them to be properly trained on the vehicle as to avoid an accidental death or injury? Why dreach?
Posted Image
The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dreachon Jul 15 2016, 04:09 PM Post #19
Member Avatar
Creative Title Here
Posts:
24,068
Group:
Members
Member
#148
Joined:
February 10, 2008
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 04:02 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 03:57 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 09:40 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 07:27 AM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 06:37 AM

Quoting limited to 10 levels deep
Is that what I said?
Make a sarcastic post, get a sarcastic response.
Sarcastic? Yes. Relevant? Yes. Are you blaming truck manufacturers and the lack of background checks on truck sales for this tragedy?
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right?

trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4

What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive.

I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't.
From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct?
Yeah. Though I'm not sure what kind of background check (if any) is used before giving someone a license. I would hope they make sure the person isn't out on probation for DUI or something like that.
So you are ok with potential violent felons, mentally ill, or domestic terrorists purchasing these vehicles that can be used irresponsibly to harm and kill so many innocent lives........without giving them a background check? Not even forcing them to be properly trained on the vehicle as to avoid an accidental death or injury? Why dreach?
Boy. Couldn't see this coming at all. :ermm:

What do you mean not forcing them to be properly trained? Have to have a license to drive a car. That's forced training. And since all cars should have to be registered, then I'm not sure what scenario there is where someone doesn't have to go through the basic checks.

But regardless of any of that. I'll point to a previous posts that makes your entire "gotcha!" attempt moot.

Quote:
 
trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4

What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.


http://s15.zetaboards.com/Our_Hoosier_Board/single/?p=8387725&t=8505244

I have absolutely zero qualms with requiring more stringent methods to acquire guns than cars. They're not the same thing. I don't think they have to be treated the same way.
Posted Image
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
brumdog44 Jul 15 2016, 04:38 PM Post #20
Member Avatar
The guy picked last in gym class
Posts:
43,823
Group:
Members
Member
#181
Joined:
February 20, 2008
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
sirbrianwilson Jul 15 2016, 05:11 PM Post #21
Member Avatar
Stemlerite
Posts:
22,404
Group:
Admin
Member
#1
Joined:
February 4, 2008
this analogy is so played out...and shitty.

br
Posted Image
Posted Image
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
mongo Jul 15 2016, 07:42 PM Post #22
Coach
Posts:
11,595
Group:
Members
Member
#160
Joined:
February 12, 2008
brumdog44
Jul 15 2016, 10:24 AM
Cars and guns aren't the same.

We actually require people to take a test in order to be able to use a car.
Love
Posted Image

"Son, if you really want something in this life you have to work hard for it. Now quiet! They're about to announce the lottery numbers."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mr Gray Jul 15 2016, 07:46 PM Post #23
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
16,503
Group:
Members
Member
#26
Joined:
February 5, 2008
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 04:09 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 04:02 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 03:57 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 09:40 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 07:27 AM

Quoting limited to 10 levels deep
Make a sarcastic post, get a sarcastic response.
Sarcastic? Yes. Relevant? Yes. Are you blaming truck manufacturers and the lack of background checks on truck sales for this tragedy?
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right?

trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4

What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive.

I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't.
From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct?
Yeah. Though I'm not sure what kind of background check (if any) is used before giving someone a license. I would hope they make sure the person isn't out on probation for DUI or something like that.
So you are ok with potential violent felons, mentally ill, or domestic terrorists purchasing these vehicles that can be used irresponsibly to harm and kill so many innocent lives........without giving them a background check? Not even forcing them to be properly trained on the vehicle as to avoid an accidental death or injury? Why dreach?
Boy. Couldn't see this coming at all. :ermm:

What do you mean not forcing them to be properly trained? Have to have a license to drive a car. That's forced training. And since all cars should have to be registered, then I'm not sure what scenario there is where someone doesn't have to go through the basic checks.

But regardless of any of that. I'll point to a previous posts that makes your entire "gotcha!" attempt moot.

Quote:
 
trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4

What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.


http://s15.zetaboards.com/Our_Hoosier_Board/single/?p=8387725&t=8505244

I have absolutely zero qualms with requiring more stringent methods to acquire guns than cars. They're not the same thing. I don't think they have to be treated the same way.
You do not have to go through any checks to buy a car. All of you who are saying otherwise should be ashamed of your dishonesty.
Posted Image
The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
sirbrianwilson Jul 15 2016, 07:49 PM Post #24
Member Avatar
Stemlerite
Posts:
22,404
Group:
Admin
Member
#1
Joined:
February 4, 2008
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dreachon Jul 15 2016, 08:11 PM Post #25
Member Avatar
Creative Title Here
Posts:
24,068
Group:
Members
Member
#148
Joined:
February 10, 2008
Guys, I don't know if this coup in Turkey counts as terrorism, but shit is WILD right now. Military busted into CNN Turkey, but hasn't cut the feed. Right now there is a live stream of the CNN Turkey office and you can hear the coup going on outside. Lots of shouting, chanting, gunfire, etc. Now reports that there have been several explosions at the airport. Here's the CNN Turkey stream.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO0g09LfbNQ&feature=youtu.be
Posted Image
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dreachon Jul 15 2016, 08:48 PM Post #26
Member Avatar
Creative Title Here
Posts:
24,068
Group:
Members
Member
#148
Joined:
February 10, 2008
Appears as though the coup has failed.
Posted Image
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dreachon Jul 15 2016, 09:19 PM Post #27
Member Avatar
Creative Title Here
Posts:
24,068
Group:
Members
Member
#148
Joined:
February 10, 2008
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 07:46 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 04:09 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 04:02 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 03:57 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 09:40 AM

Quoting limited to 10 levels deep
Sarcastic? Yes. Relevant? Yes. Are you blaming truck manufacturers and the lack of background checks on truck sales for this tragedy?
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right?

trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4

What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive.

I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't.
From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct?
Yeah. Though I'm not sure what kind of background check (if any) is used before giving someone a license. I would hope they make sure the person isn't out on probation for DUI or something like that.
So you are ok with potential violent felons, mentally ill, or domestic terrorists purchasing these vehicles that can be used irresponsibly to harm and kill so many innocent lives........without giving them a background check? Not even forcing them to be properly trained on the vehicle as to avoid an accidental death or injury? Why dreach?
Boy. Couldn't see this coming at all. :ermm:

What do you mean not forcing them to be properly trained? Have to have a license to drive a car. That's forced training. And since all cars should have to be registered, then I'm not sure what scenario there is where someone doesn't have to go through the basic checks.

But regardless of any of that. I'll point to a previous posts that makes your entire "gotcha!" attempt moot.

Quote:
 
trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4

What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.


http://s15.zetaboards.com/Our_Hoosier_Board/single/?p=8387725&t=8505244

I have absolutely zero qualms with requiring more stringent methods to acquire guns than cars. They're not the same thing. I don't think they have to be treated the same way.
You do not have to go through any checks to buy a car. All of you who are saying otherwise should be ashamed of your dishonesty.
Sure thing. I'll go be ashamed now.
Posted Image
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mr Gray Jul 15 2016, 09:40 PM Post #28
Member Avatar
Coach
Posts:
16,503
Group:
Members
Member
#26
Joined:
February 5, 2008
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 09:19 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 07:46 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 04:09 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 04:02 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 03:57 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 03:39 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 01:35 PM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 12:55 PM
dreachon
Jul 15 2016, 10:29 AM
Mr Gray
Jul 15 2016, 10:11 AM

Quoting limited to 10 levels deep
Totally right? Just like all those times I said we should ban guns, right?

trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4

What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.
Dreach, do you think we should have mandatory background checks for all truck purchases?
I think the current method we use of requiring a license and registration in order to drive a car is enough. In private sales, I wouldn't expect us to require a private citizen to run a background check on someone else. But, when the new registration is sent in with the new owner, if that person is legally not allowed to drive the car, I would expect that registration to be denied, thereby making the car illegal to drive.

I don't know whether this opinion constitutes me being in favor a background checks for cars or not. I guess on some level it both does and doesn't.
From reading what you said, I would like to clarify. It seems as though what you are saying is that you do not think someone should have to have a background check in order to purchase a vehicle however they should have some form of background check run prior to using the vehicle in the public domain. Is this correct?
Yeah. Though I'm not sure what kind of background check (if any) is used before giving someone a license. I would hope they make sure the person isn't out on probation for DUI or something like that.
So you are ok with potential violent felons, mentally ill, or domestic terrorists purchasing these vehicles that can be used irresponsibly to harm and kill so many innocent lives........without giving them a background check? Not even forcing them to be properly trained on the vehicle as to avoid an accidental death or injury? Why dreach?
Boy. Couldn't see this coming at all. :ermm:

What do you mean not forcing them to be properly trained? Have to have a license to drive a car. That's forced training. And since all cars should have to be registered, then I'm not sure what scenario there is where someone doesn't have to go through the basic checks.

But regardless of any of that. I'll point to a previous posts that makes your entire "gotcha!" attempt moot.

Quote:
 
trucks /= gun /= forks /= C4

What you do with one does not mean you have to do the same with literally everything else.


http://s15.zetaboards.com/Our_Hoosier_Board/single/?p=8387725&t=8505244

I have absolutely zero qualms with requiring more stringent methods to acquire guns than cars. They're not the same thing. I don't think they have to be treated the same way.
You do not have to go through any checks to buy a car. All of you who are saying otherwise should be ashamed of your dishonesty.
Sure thing. I'll go be ashamed now.
Good.
Posted Image
The body knows what fighters don't: how to protect itself. A neck can only twist so far. Twist it just a hair more and the body says, "Hey, I'll take it from here because you obviously don't know what you're doing... Lie down now, rest, and we'll talk about this when you regain your senses." It's called the knockout mechanism.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
mongo Jul 17 2016, 10:42 AM Post #29
Coach
Posts:
11,595
Group:
Members
Member
#160
Joined:
February 12, 2008
Another attack this morning on police. In Baton Rouge at least 7 officers shot and 3 are dead
Posted Image

"Son, if you really want something in this life you have to work hard for it. Now quiet! They're about to announce the lottery numbers."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
brumdog44 Jul 17 2016, 11:30 AM Post #30
Member Avatar
The guy picked last in gym class
Posts:
43,823
Group:
Members
Member
#181
Joined:
February 20, 2008
Damn it.
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Politics · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Track Topic · E-mail Topic Time: 7:54 PM Jul 10
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy