|
Day 1: The Adventure Begins; Let's Start Exploring
|
|
Topic Started: Oct 20 2016, 11:00 PM (2,314 Views)
|
|
Dandy
|
Oct 21 2016, 02:05 AM
Post #31
|
|
Space Dandy
- Posts:
- 95
- Group:
- Murdered Players
- Member
- #14
- Joined:
- Oct 18, 2016
|
- Pappug
- Oct 21 2016, 01:24 AM
Vote Lynch: Guilmon
No, I think 24 hours is plenty of time to come on and with this kind of setup lynching is our best and only weapon in discovering Mafia. Well, besides reading and analyzing posts of course but if the user isn't posting what's there to read?
- Quote:
-
Power roles arent the only bits of information that are valuable. Useful? Sure, and you do bring up a point that I hadnt thought about. But at the core, seeing who mafia goes for in a pool of active players does give us information.
Bottom line is that I find a larger group of loose activity to be less useful down the line than a smaller group of actually active individuals. Otherwise at one point the valuable ones get knocked out and we are at the mercy of inactive to even lynch.
Also, natural observation throughout the progress of the game means a lot less if we establish that it is fine for people to hang along being unhelpful. Gives us less to work with, not more.
So if Guillmon ends up posting a couple of decent posts, you would still want to lynch someone? And the criteria would be activity? Is reducing that player pool of potential targets from 11 to 10 such a step forward? Don´t get me wrong, I agree that organized activity in a smaller group is better than loose and disjointed searchs, but at this point of the game, loose/disjointed activity is kind of expected.
- Quote:
-
Vote Lynch: Guilmon
No, I think 24 hours is plenty of time to come on and with this kind of setup lynching is our best and only weapon in discovering Mafia. Well, besides reading and analyzing posts of course but if the user isn't posting what's there to read?
Mind explaining this? Without using Mimi´s logic.
|
|
|
| |
|
Dandy
|
Oct 21 2016, 02:06 AM
Post #32
|
|
Space Dandy
- Posts:
- 95
- Group:
- Murdered Players
- Member
- #14
- Joined:
- Oct 18, 2016
|
First quote´s Mimi´s. Forget the misplaced Pappug one at the beggining.
|
|
|
| |
|
Dandy
|
Oct 21 2016, 02:07 AM
Post #33
|
|
Space Dandy
- Posts:
- 95
- Group:
- Murdered Players
- Member
- #14
- Joined:
- Oct 18, 2016
|
- Yoshikage Kira
- Oct 21 2016, 01:35 AM
What if Guilmon was silenced however? [/JOKE]
I still would give him a little more time. We have about 40 hours left this day, I'll begin to worry if he doesn't post in the next 24hrs. What if Guilmon is THE FOOOOOOOOOOL? (/Ikid)
|
|
|
| |
|
Mimi
|
Oct 21 2016, 02:13 AM
Post #34
|
|
Digimon
- Posts:
- 137
- Group:
- Players
- Member
- #12
- Joined:
- Oct 18, 2016
|
- Dandy
- Oct 21 2016, 02:05 AM
- Pappug
- Oct 21 2016, 01:24 AM
Vote Lynch: Guilmon
No, I think 24 hours is plenty of time to come on and with this kind of setup lynching is our best and only weapon in discovering Mafia. Well, besides reading and analyzing posts of course but if the user isn't posting what's there to read?
- Quote:
-
Power roles arent the only bits of information that are valuable. Useful? Sure, and you do bring up a point that I hadnt thought about. But at the core, seeing who mafia goes for in a pool of active players does give us information.
Bottom line is that I find a larger group of loose activity to be less useful down the line than a smaller group of actually active individuals. Otherwise at one point the valuable ones get knocked out and we are at the mercy of inactive to even lynch.
Also, natural observation throughout the progress of the game means a lot less if we establish that it is fine for people to hang along being unhelpful. Gives us less to work with, not more.
So if Guillmon ends up posting a couple of decent posts, you would still want to lynch someone? And the criteria would be activity? Is reducing that player pool of potential targets from 11 to 10 such a step forward? Don´t get me wrong, I agree that organized activity in a smaller group is better than loose and disjointed searchs, but at this point of the game, loose/disjointed activity is kind of expected. - Quote:
-
Vote Lynch: Guilmon
No, I think 24 hours is plenty of time to come on and with this kind of setup lynching is our best and only weapon in discovering Mafia. Well, besides reading and analyzing posts of course but if the user isn't posting what's there to read?
Mind explaining this? Without using Mimi´s logic. Guilmon is not the only one who has failed to show up today so that question is an easy yes.
|
|
|
| |
|
Dandy
|
Oct 21 2016, 02:25 AM
Post #35
|
|
Space Dandy
- Posts:
- 95
- Group:
- Murdered Players
- Member
- #14
- Joined:
- Oct 18, 2016
|
- Mimi
- Oct 21 2016, 02:13 AM
- Dandy
- Oct 21 2016, 02:05 AM
- Pappug
- Oct 21 2016, 01:24 AM
Vote Lynch: Guilmon
No, I think 24 hours is plenty of time to come on and with this kind of setup lynching is our best and only weapon in discovering Mafia. Well, besides reading and analyzing posts of course but if the user isn't posting what's there to read?
- Quote:
-
Power roles arent the only bits of information that are valuable. Useful? Sure, and you do bring up a point that I hadnt thought about. But at the core, seeing who mafia goes for in a pool of active players does give us information.
Bottom line is that I find a larger group of loose activity to be less useful down the line than a smaller group of actually active individuals. Otherwise at one point the valuable ones get knocked out and we are at the mercy of inactive to even lynch.
Also, natural observation throughout the progress of the game means a lot less if we establish that it is fine for people to hang along being unhelpful. Gives us less to work with, not more.
So if Guillmon ends up posting a couple of decent posts, you would still want to lynch someone? And the criteria would be activity? Is reducing that player pool of potential targets from 11 to 10 such a step forward? Don´t get me wrong, I agree that organized activity in a smaller group is better than loose and disjointed searchs, but at this point of the game, loose/disjointed activity is kind of expected. - Quote:
-
Vote Lynch: Guilmon
No, I think 24 hours is plenty of time to come on and with this kind of setup lynching is our best and only weapon in discovering Mafia. Well, besides reading and analyzing posts of course but if the user isn't posting what's there to read?
Mind explaining this? Without using Mimi´s logic.
Guilmon is not the only one who has failed to show up today so that question is an easy yes. Come on Baby. That´s the easy way out. You know what I meant.
|
|
|
| |
|
Hinata Hyuga
|
Oct 21 2016, 02:40 AM
Post #36
|
|
Naruto
- Posts:
- 125
- Group:
- Admins
- Member
- #2
- Joined:
- Oct 16, 2016
|
Everyone should know by now that green is the best color to be.
With 14 players, it takes 8 to lynch.
Lelouch vi Britannia (1): Dandy Mimi (1): Yoshikage Kira Guilmon (2): Lelouch vi Britannia, Pappug
Not Voting (10): Astro Boy, Claire Stanfield, Dr. Tenma, Edward Weevil, Guilmon, Hanamichi Sakuragi, Isaac Dian, Kakashi Hatake, Mimi, Yuuki Rito
|
|
|
| |
|
Yuuki Rito
|
Oct 21 2016, 02:42 AM
Post #37
|
|
To Love-ru
- Posts:
- 49
- Group:
- Murdered Players
- Member
- #6
- Joined:
- Oct 18, 2016
|
- Mimi
- Oct 21 2016, 12:42 AM
- Dandy
- Oct 21 2016, 12:26 AM
- Mimi
- Oct 21 2016, 12:11 AM
As for votes I think I want to wait for Guilmon before doing my part... if he fails to speak then I think we need to talk about possible action. If not, then I think getting rid of one of the many silly boys will do our ship some good.
Why? Because I have the opposite opinion.
Scaring meek boys who refuse to participate or help into being active does multiple things 1- the bad guys wont have an easy kill where they can just knock off someone who hasnt done anything, and forces them to commit to a kill that can actually be traced or give us information 2- it lets us know what we can expect of our shipmates and who aims to be consistently valuable as opposed to those who only become valuable when they want to hide mean intentions 3- Our ship and our friends will all be stronger if we commit as a group to help or accept our loss if we fail to keep up Do you have a different idea? because raising conversation based on just what people decide to wear is just mean and not really helpful at all I agree with Mimi here. Guilmon is more than useless right now, but if he lasts another day like this than he becomes dangerous to keep around.
|
|
|
| |
|
Mimi
|
Oct 21 2016, 02:47 AM
Post #38
|
|
Digimon
- Posts:
- 137
- Group:
- Players
- Member
- #12
- Joined:
- Oct 18, 2016
|
Dandy: ew, dont call me baby >_<
The quote is far too gigantic to be practical, so I'm dropping it.
You should be specific about the answers you want. Not going to get far myself if I make assumptions about what people want from me.
But if I HAD to assume in this one, the answer is still yes. I think its still a good idea to call out the inactive people or the lowest contributors hoping that moves them into action. I thought I had already said that but I must not be being clear? '_';;
What I wonder now is why with two other people so far stating similar opinions (or is it one? ugh, these names are so hard to remember), you find it important to be interviewing just me. Teasing the only girl already? tsk, how predictable. It seems you think you have a way with girls, but I may be far too pure for you =P
|
|
|
| |
|
Yoshikage Kira
|
Oct 21 2016, 02:53 AM
Post #39
|
|
Jojo's Bizarre Adventure
- Posts:
- 41
- Group:
- Murdered Players
- Member
- #18
- Joined:
- Oct 18, 2016
|
- Mimi
- Oct 21 2016, 02:13 AM
Guilmon is not the only one who has failed to show up today so that question is an easy yes. You seem very hectic, lady. The day hasn't lasted even 4 hours yet, but you already want to throw shade at anyone who hasn' t shown up today. You might not have as nice of a watch as I have, but you should know that there are different time zones in play here.
I would talk about someone being inactive in 20 hours, but right now it feels rather early, don't you think?
|
|
|
| |
|
Mimi
|
Oct 21 2016, 02:57 AM
Post #40
|
|
Digimon
- Posts:
- 137
- Group:
- Players
- Member
- #12
- Joined:
- Oct 18, 2016
|
- Yoshikage Kira
- Oct 21 2016, 02:53 AM
- Mimi
- Oct 21 2016, 02:13 AM
Guilmon is not the only one who has failed to show up today so that question is an easy yes.
You seem very hectic, lady. The day hasn't lasted even 4 hours yet, but you already want to throw shade at anyone who hasn' t shown up today. You might not have as nice of a watch as I have, but you should know that there are different time zones in play here. I would talk about someone being inactive in 20 hours, but right now it feels rather early, don't you think? Stating my view doesnt mean I'm not waiting. You may have noticed that unlike others I havent thrown a vote yet.
Why not call the people who have voted already hasty? ... oh, I see, because the first thing you did was vote...
You boys are so rude!
|
|
|
| |