Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Imperial Leaders
Welcome to the Ragerian Imperium!
Useful Links
The Royal Family:
Emperor: Vulturret[NS]
Prince of the First Rank: Sithis[NS]
Imperial Council:
Grand Councillor: Madeline[NS]
Internal Affairs: Xemt[NS]
Communications: Vulturret[NS]
World Assembly Affairs: Manson [NS]
External Affairs: Samsonyte[NS]

Citizens' Assembly Officials:
Speaker: McMannia Whitehall[NS]
Imperial Justiciars:
Chief Justiciar: Aav VerinHall[NS]
Associate Justiciar: Smith VerinGuard[NS]
Associate Justiciar: Zaphkael[NS]

Imperial War Command:
Fleet Admiral: Scottie[NS]
Admiral: Samsonyte[NS]
Admiral: Sithis[NS]
Admiral: McMannia Whitehall[NS]
Welcome to the Ragerian Imperium, the largest and most powerful empire in the galaxy!


~ Citizenship Application ~
~ Diplomatic Application ~
~ Armada Enlistment Application ~
~ Discord Server ~
~ The Constitution and Criminal Code ~
Welcome to Ragerian Imperium. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
[DRAFT] The Regional Tags Act
Topic Started: Jun 24 2018, 03:15 AM (150 Views)
Manson
Member Avatar
Hollow
1. This Act shall be known as the Regional Tags Act.

2. The Grand Councillor is responsible for managing the tags shown on The Ragerian Imperium's regional page.

3. The following regional tags must not be added to The Ragerian Imperium's page: "Defender", "Totalitarian", "Fascist", or "Mercenary".

4. The following regional tags must not be removed from The Ragerian Imperium's page: "Invader", "Regional Government", "Roleplayer", "Offsite Chat", and "Offsite Forums".
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Replies:
The Honorable Aav Verinhall
Member Avatar
Chief Justicar
Madeline
Jul 6 2018, 05:05 PM
We may not have decorum rules Mr. VerinHall but I suggest you watch your language.

Either way these discussions above have nothing to do with this bill and as such do not belong here.

If the Speaker could please archive or shed some light on the current dilemma we are in, I wold be in great appreciation.
The egregious behavior of Caesar towards me due to his quest to prove me wrong was unacceptable, and I let my temper get the best of me in that altercation. I apologize for that, but I ask for an apology from Caesar for his behavior towards me, and his untrue comments about my commitment to the region.

EDIT:
Not like I'm a judge or anything… :P
But the APA was a rush job, just like the CPA. It does not explicitly hold powers away, but neither does it instate them. I'm going to back away from my initial stance, and instead open up a public inquiry by the judicial branch. All of the Justiciars will contribute to the final ruling. If you have anything to contribute, please post it in the appropriate thread in the chambers.
Point being, if anybody can write a better APA that isn't a constitutional amendment, please do. In the meantime, we'll release a judicial hotfix to covesr the issues.
Edited by Aav Verinhall, Jul 7 2018, 03:44 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Madeline
Member Avatar

Aav Verinhall
Jul 7 2018, 03:36 AM
Madeline
Jul 6 2018, 05:05 PM
We may not have decorum rules Mr. VerinHall but I suggest you watch your language.

Either way these discussions above have nothing to do with this bill and as such do not belong here.

If the Speaker could please archive or shed some light on the current dilemma we are in, I wold be in great appreciation.
The egregious behavior of Caesar towards me due to his quest to prove me wrong was unacceptable, and I let my temper get the best of me in that altercation. I apologize for that, but I ask for an apology from Caesar for his behavior towards me, and his untrue comments about my commitment to the region.

EDIT:
Not like I'm a judge or anything… :P
But the APA was a rush job, just like the CPA. It does not explicitly hold powers away, but neither does it instate them. I'm going to back away from my initial stance, and instead open up a public inquiry by the judicial branch. All of the Justiciars will contribute to the final ruling. If you have anything to contribute, please post it in the appropriate thread in the chambers.
Point being, if anybody can write a better APA that isn't a constitutional amendment, please do. In the meantime, we'll release a judicial hotfix to covesr the issues.
I believe he was referring to your rather lackluster commitment to the region as of late, IRL aside, you have not been as involved with the region within the past few weeks, it has been noticed due to your seemingly strange need to have the Justiciars rule on something they were not asked to get involved in. The speaker holds the authority here. As this thing here is not a law nor is it being considered a law in any form, your presence as "judge" really doesn't matter and any ruling brought about by the Judiciary without being asked would be an infringement on the duties of the Speaker, both assumed duties and official.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Caesar
Member Avatar
Deputy Grand Councillor
I personally see a judicial "hotfix" as an unnecessary hassle since it is a legislative issue due to the poor writing of the procedures in the first place. It is both entertaining and alarming how you begin a judicial review over an implied legislative power when the very concept of the judicial review, after analyzing Article IV of the Constitution and the court procedures, is an implied power. You can attempt to best me again by using Article IV section 5 as your rebuttal and claim to have the sole right to final interpretation in matters of the Assembly. Unfortunately, that sole interpretation power only holds to the constitutionality of laws. This conundrum you have started is not a constitutional matter and thus can be seen as an infringement on the legislature and, frankly, corrupt. I suggest your court stay in its lane.

Since your "notice" post was a confession to corruption and all of your statements, including your apology and petty complaints about me, were retracted since they held no legal advice or relevance to the conversation at hand, I can say this no better than the famous Alucard from Hellsing Ultimate Abridged, and I quote, "I'm not apologizing". I do hope you receive proper repercussions for using a high office entrusted to you by the people for personal interests.

Moving on, my motion to archive this bill stands. Members of the Assembly may continue to second the motion if they so wish while we wait for the Speaker.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Citizens’ Assembly · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Skin by Seraphim