What's masquerading here

Welcome to The Ban Clan. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

What's masquerading here
Topic Started: Dec 11 2006, 05:13 PM (266 Views)
Prushka	Dec 11 2006, 05:13 PM Post #1
Super Advanced Member Posts: 1,024 Group: Members Member #24 Joined: February 21, 2006	Millions of commercial Web sites and personal blogs would be required to report illegal images or videos posted by their users or pay fines of up to $300,000, if a new proposal in the U.S. Senate came into law. Quote: http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6142332.ht...-0-20&subj=news Child exploitation is one thing, but how far reaching will this Senate Bill be After child pornography or some forms of "obscenity" are found and reported, the Web site must retain any "information relating to the facts or circumstances" of the incident for at least six months. Webmasters would be immune from civil and criminal liability if they followed the specified procedures exactly. So...What's obscenity It seems to me that this will be one more avenue used to turn the internet, this country, and yours to follow shortly thereafter by these goddamn globalists into a police state



Johnny Fist	Dec 11 2006, 09:37 PM Post #2
Ultimate Advanced Member Posts: 3,030 Group: Members Member #21 Joined: February 19, 2006	You just now realized that? Couple that with the fact that all forms of entertainment, news, and communications are being done with the computer you're sitting in front of and its disturbing to think how much control the government has over you by simply knowing your ip address. And if you think google is able to return relevant search requests the way it does without having a list of every query you've ever made in a central database you're a fool.



Prushka	Dec 12 2006, 09:32 PM Post #3
Super Advanced Member Posts: 1,024 Group: Members Member #24 Joined: February 21, 2006	From what I understand, you can be tracked to a router, maybe I mistaken Anyway, there a big difference between being logged in some pricks data bank and issueing in some new law. A law that's being proposed as a child exploitation preventative, but has vagaries such as what the hell obscenity will be It occurred to me sometime back that there are probably government sponcered porn sites design specifically for profiling, after all if they set up the site and gather info. there'd be no need to tap google data bank



Johnny Fist	Dec 12 2006, 09:39 PM Post #4
Ultimate Advanced Member Posts: 3,030 Group: Members Member #21 Joined: February 19, 2006	Yeah, you can be tracked to a router. Whats your point? As far as the profiling porn sites, I think that would be considered entrapment.



Prushka	Dec 12 2006, 09:43 PM Post #5
Super Advanced Member Posts: 1,024 Group: Members Member #24 Joined: February 21, 2006	So what's the point of a router And WTF are you doing up...getting an early jump on the market



Johnny Fist	Dec 12 2006, 09:50 PM Post #6
Ultimate Advanced Member Posts: 3,030 Group: Members Member #21 Joined: February 19, 2006	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Router I always get up early.



Prushka	Dec 16 2006, 07:32 PM Post #7
Super Advanced Member Posts: 1,024 Group: Members Member #24 Joined: February 21, 2006	Don't know, but thought you might find this of interest J�rgen Schmidt The hole trick How Skype & Co. get round firewalls Peer-to-peer software applications are a network administrator's nightmare. In order to be able to exchange packets with their counterpart as directly as possible they use subtle tricks to punch holes in firewalls, which shouldn't actually be letting in packets from the outside world. http://www.heise-security.co.uk/articles/82481



Johnny Fist	Dec 17 2006, 03:48 AM Post #8
Ultimate Advanced Member Posts: 3,030 Group: Members Member #21 Joined: February 19, 2006	Thats interesting and everything, but the article even says you have to allow outgoing UDP connections. Why anyone would intentionally do that is beyond me.


« Previous Topic · News · Next Topic »