Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Episode 14 | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: May 27 2017, 10:28:31 PM (1,509 Views) | |
| Lucy | May 27 2017, 10:28:31 PM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Clarence was... Spoiler: click to toggle
|
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Edna | May 30 2017, 10:06:40 AM Post #101 |
![]()
Steph
|
okay, i understand the distinction. it's only when you slip the signal in unnoticed that it would be a code. players could still basically do the same thing, still send a signal but no longer sneakily under the table. but how would that change the game?
Edited by Edna, May 30 2017, 10:07:53 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Edna | May 30 2017, 10:23:13 AM Post #102 |
![]()
Steph
|
I actually like the trio idea he didn't use because then Julia can pass info back and forth between the chats That's probably what i'd do instead of trying to ban codes: give every player like 5 free nuclear bombs they can use during the game. that or tinker w/ chat day so people can be in more chats but it's more publicly known (and Cydney goes nuclear. wonderful! the thing is she picked julia and penner who have their own private two person chat so they can privately discuss everything she says to them) Edited by Edna, May 30 2017, 10:46:33 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Lucy | May 30 2017, 10:57:18 AM Post #103 |
![]()
|
If Cydney goes for a second nuclear option and does Frosti and T-Bird and then asks them to vote out Julia, that would change everything. I think they might do it - and Cydney can already count on John sticking with the plan. I don't know if T-Bird would be able to vote out Julia straight-up, but if she switched to Penner, it'd be 3-2-1 Julia-John/Cydney-Penner. |
![]() |
|
| Edna | May 30 2017, 11:35:26 AM Post #104 |
![]()
Steph
|
What was this vote at before the nuclear option? 2 John 2 Cydney 1 Frosti 1 Julia I guess.. ironically Penner and Frosti were already getting what they wanted, one of John or Cydney out (although Julia hadn't placed her vote)
Edited by Edna, May 30 2017, 11:36:08 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Kim | May 30 2017, 11:42:33 AM Post #105 |
![]()
|
I disagree about banning codes. We saw with the eon links what happens when the mods artificially limit communication. Saying "Here's something that you're going to want to talk about but we won't allow you to talk about because we said so" just means people are going to try to get around it. Codes can lead to some drama too. Penner got paranoid about John because John never talked to Penner in code. |
![]() |
|
| Holly | May 30 2017, 11:52:42 AM Post #106 |
![]()
Jaclyn (mcmenno)
|
I think tbird would rather take out cydney, she's way more of a liability and has a ton of stamina |
![]() |
|
| Holly | May 30 2017, 11:52:59 AM Post #107 |
![]()
Jaclyn (mcmenno)
|
(and tbird thinks julia is almost used up) |
![]() |
|
| Dawson | May 30 2017, 11:56:48 AM Post #108 |
![]()
|
There's no way to get around it. When all communication is public, it's pretty easy to dissect what is code and what is not if you have a strict definition to abide by. |
![]() |
|
| Twila | May 30 2017, 12:16:24 PM Post #109 |
![]()
|
This seems about a thousand times better than abolishing all codes imo. |
![]() |
|
| Edna | May 30 2017, 12:30:45 PM Post #110 |
![]()
Steph
|
I kind of feel like this game is sort of on a track now where people are just gonna go "well we gotta get [Cydney] out before the end" -> [Julia] -> [T-Bird] and the only thing that can stop it is idols and immunities. Otherwise Frosti Penner John f3 |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · SPECS! · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:57 PM Jul 11
|
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy












2:57 PM Jul 11