Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Episode 14 | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: May 27 2017, 10:28:31 PM (1,503 Views) | |
| Lucy | May 27 2017, 10:28:31 PM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Clarence was... Spoiler: click to toggle
|
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Edna | May 30 2017, 10:10:07 PM Post #161 |
![]()
Steph
|
Frosti actually got Penner onboard so T-Bird and Julia making up and the idol threat really was not the only factor, but Cydney will go to the jury saying it is. It still would've been 3-2-1 without Julia
Edited by Edna, May 30 2017, 10:12:42 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Gervase | May 30 2017, 11:58:45 PM Post #162 |
![]()
Courtney (Reck)
|
this take? so hot so fucking bold |
![]() |
|
| Gervase | May 30 2017, 11:59:18 PM Post #163 |
![]()
Courtney (Reck)
|
idk sry but it taints it when it's literally just always jess cheering for kilbs and kilbs cheering for jess as if there's no objectivity |
![]() |
|
| Stacy | May 31 2017, 12:02:24 AM Post #164 |
![]()
Empking's Alt's Alt
|
spectators don't have to be objective. |
![]() |
|
| Parvati | May 31 2017, 12:02:48 AM Post #165 |
![]()
|
"I am here to spread my wisdom of knowing this game" - person who was voted out 4-1-1 with no idea what happened. yeah clearly no one else thinks T-B is playing well rn you got it |
![]() |
|
| Gervase | May 31 2017, 12:04:49 AM Post #166 |
![]()
Courtney (Reck)
|
shes a mod it's fine specs dont have to be objective but it's still hard to not just at iti want to take what people say and consider it! and have it change my infallible opinion! |
![]() |
|
| Parvati | May 31 2017, 12:12:50 AM Post #167 |
![]()
|
So, when you were cheering for Brock as a mod it was okay, but when they cheer for each other it's bad? Neither of those should be weird and considering AlexASS has less posts then I have in this thread it's not like this opinion is deluged, you're being unfair. :/ |
![]() |
|
| Gervase | May 31 2017, 12:17:09 AM Post #168 |
![]()
Courtney (Reck)
|
yeah i cheered for brock but it was coupled with "bahaha how is he getting this far?" and fair critiques of his gameplay and an admission of being obviously biased. i wasnt dropping random comments of "omg so impressed with Zeratul right now!!!" in a vacuum it just irks me maybe it's from reading an entire mod's chat worth of kilby shilling for jess in Neds and im holding a resentment bias |
![]() |
|
| C.T. | May 31 2017, 12:21:21 AM Post #169 |
![]()
|
damn who spilled this coffee |
![]() |
|
| Gervase | May 31 2017, 12:23:31 AM Post #170 |
![]()
Courtney (Reck)
|
like i actually went back and looked at my zeratul content in nexus prior to doing that and it was either: a) a fair critique of his game mostly giving him ways to build on the future b) lolling at the trolliness of what was happening or rooting for the underdog to overthrow the alliance i didn't just chime in and talk about wow how impressive is zeratul huh??? and people aren't treating him fair! in fact i purposefully didn't do that and had OTHER mods chiming on how stuff wasn't actually zeratul's fault that i was being too hard on him on point being: if the only content you're giving about your SO is just pure positive stuff it starts to grate because it feels like you can't be objective like own it. say "omg i dont care i want tbird to fite back yas kweeen!" and im here for it but dont be like "Wow gee golly gosh!!!! that person tbird sure is impressing me! i am smitten! who is this doll!?" |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · SPECS! · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:57 PM Jul 11
|
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy













2:57 PM Jul 11