Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Episode 14 | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: May 27 2017, 10:28:31 PM (1,511 Views) | |
| Lucy | May 27 2017, 10:28:31 PM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Clarence was... Spoiler: click to toggle
|
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Ken | May 29 2017, 08:39:42 PM Post #81 |
![]()
|
I feel like there are design solutions to the codes that address what Edna brought up, but a lot of them lead to other problems. Simultaneous chats is probably the best one. |
![]() |
|
| Bill | May 29 2017, 09:12:25 PM Post #82 |
![]()
|
This Julia/T-bird chat is fire |
![]() |
|
| Parvati | May 29 2017, 10:25:18 PM Post #83 |
![]()
|
I like the codes because the more complicated you make them, the more likely it is people like John miss them, or Kenny's codes get unnoticed by everyone. It's also something other people can pick up on. It's not making it like PMing at all: I can tell you I'm voting Cydney, but not why, why you should, that you should play your idol and idol out someone else. If you tried to make them illegal people would just hint at things in previous chats anyways. |
![]() |
|
| Dawson | May 29 2017, 11:04:34 PM Post #84 |
![]()
|
It's asinine. I don't come here to pick through the milieu of words people are saying for A) things that are codes I need to remember, or B) things that could be codes that I need to key in on. I was frustrated enough by having to have a thread where I just copypasted code lists (which is kind of a different issue of not having access to previous conversations), then to have to take that all into account is silly. I think codes need to be banned and there need to be more chat groups, which I realize is even more work to pile on for the mods, but still. |
![]() |
|
| Stacy | May 29 2017, 11:16:02 PM Post #85 |
![]()
Empking's Alt's Alt
|
banning codes is not possible honestly. what about "we should do the first thing we discussed". Legal? |
![]() |
|
| Lucy | May 29 2017, 11:30:25 PM Post #86 |
![]()
|
I can agree that more group chats can be a good thing. Definitely have some ideas brewing for future games for how many group chats are needed for balance. |
![]() |
|
| Stacy | May 29 2017, 11:39:16 PM Post #87 |
![]()
Empking's Alt's Alt
|
i got the survivor scores wrong so i fixed them. all it means is eliminated premergers got less points, except jaclyn got more points because i was bad at maths last time. so you did beat skypevivor. Spoiler: click to toggle edit for even more bad maths. 2+2+4+4+3+5=18 apparently Edited by Stacy, May 30 2017, 12:16:08 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Ken | May 29 2017, 11:39:53 PM Post #88 |
![]()
|
Yeah that's fine. Like, having a signal is okay or referring to previous conversations is something that could conceivably be done in f2f. Having a fleshed out code that lets you have a conversation while having what is nominally a different conversation is not. |
![]() |
|
| Ken | May 29 2017, 11:40:19 PM Post #89 |
![]()
|
And yeah definitely more chat groups. That, or make the game longer so that you can do sequential chats. |
![]() |
|
| Stacy | May 29 2017, 11:43:20 PM Post #90 |
![]()
Empking's Alt's Alt
|
"clap your hands if you want me to play an idol" "learn semaphore" etc |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · SPECS! · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:57 PM Jul 11
|
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy













2:57 PM Jul 11