| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Album Sales Plummet to Lowest Weekly Total in Decades | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jun 4 2010, 09:21 PM (176 Views) | |
| TickTock | Jun 4 2010, 09:21 PM Post #1 |
|
I Fckt Riverwide N Da Azz Real Hard Again
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
http://www.billboard.com/#/news/album-sale...tory?tag=hpfeed Bad times just got worse. For the week ending May 30, the U.S. music industry sold a total of 4,984,000 albums, according to Nielsen Soundscan. This figure, which includes new and catalog releases, represents the fewest number of albums sold in one week since Soundscan began compiling this data in 1994. By comparison, album sales for the week ending May 31, 2009, totaled 5.76 million. The highest one-week tally recorded during the Soundscan era is 45.4 million albums, in late December, 2000. This week's record low comes as the major record companies continue to reckon with a decade-long decline in sales, and as other prominent sectors of the industry, such as the touring business, go through sea changes of their own. And that's not all: While there's no exact way to compare last week's total against imprecise, pre-Soundscan tallies, Billboard estimates that weekly album sales volume could, in fact, be at its lowest point since the early 1970s. "We think this is the lowest week ever, or at least of the Soundscan era," says Universal Music Group Distribution president Jim Urie. According to the RIAA, album shipments in 1973 totaled 388.2 million units, an average of 7.47 million per week. Because Soundscan measures albums sold (i.e. scanned) and not albums shipped, Billboard looked at the relationship between annual album shipments, as measured by the RIAA, and annual albums sold, as compiled by Soundscan, for the years 1992-2009. During that period, shipments exceeded scans by an average of 30%. By applying that 30% figure to the 1973 RIAA album shipment data, Billboard estimates that weekly album sales volume for that year may have totaled about 5.5 million units. That exceeds this past week's tally by 600,000 copies. (The RIAA began keeping figures on album shipments in 1973.) Veteran sales executives caution against putting too much stock into pre-Soundscan record keeping. "Who the hell knows what weekly sales were back then," says Lou Dennis, who retired as Warner Bros. Records head of sales in 1996. Whatever the benchmark, industry executives agree that this week's album sales total of 4.98 million units is "pretty scary," in the words of Bruce Ogilvie, CEO of leading music wholesaler Super D. Digital track sales for the week totaled 21.7 million, and are distinct from the album sales tally. UMGD's Urie cites this week's album total as "all the more reason why everyone in the industry should be focused on getting the U.S. Congress to introduce legislation that makes the Internet service providers our allies in fighting piracy. Piracy is getting worse and worse and the government needs to focus on that." Like Ogilvie, Urie thinks that the slow release schedule is the main reason for the drop-off. "This week is likely a major aberration with no big new releases out," he says. "June will be big. Look at all the big records coming out, including Sara McLachlan, Drake, Miley Cyrus, Eminem and Jack Johnson." |
![]() |
|
| bulgar | Jun 5 2010, 01:23 AM Post #2 |
|
Pensioner
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
wow, they really have to think of a new way to sell/promote music. |
![]() |
|
| Vancho | Jun 5 2010, 10:44 AM Post #3 |
|
Mature
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They should just make it free. |
![]() |
|
| Mats | Jun 5 2010, 10:49 AM Post #4 |
![]()
IN THE CENTRE OF A RING JUST LIKE A CIRCUS
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I blame Cuntina |
![]() |
|
| Beautiful Stranger | Jun 20 2010, 02:43 AM Post #5 |
![]()
Pensioner
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They need to start by no longer making album tracks available for individual download at the digital outlets. Maybe even singles should no longer be available to purchase individually once the initial chart run and release are done with. And making music that's actually worth buying in the first place would be good, and most important. Mainstream radio/music has always been polluted by crap, but in the last decade or so it's been worse than ever. It's almost as though the labels keep testing radio listeners to see how shit they can make the music they send for adds before people stop listening to new music stations altogether. Apparently the labels don't realize that as they do this people keep listening, but those same average record buyers are being taught that music is throwaway, not worth paying for, and is supposed to be as vapid as possible. They're shooting themselves in the feet and they don't even know it. Radio in the states is particularly abysmal. Solo singles from acts over 40 are automatically disqualified at Top 40/Pop and usually automatically disqualified at Rhythmic and Urban radio. Most genres of music are exclusively relegated to their own genre-specific stations on formats that get far less listeners, all the while Top 40/Pop only touches by-the-numbers electropop and urbanpop rubbish with the occasional crossover hit. And that wouldn't be as big a problem if it weren't for how shit 99% of the songs they play actually are. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Music Discussion · Next Topic » |
| Theme: Rebel Heart 2 | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:19 PM Jul 11
|




![]](http://z4.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)





2:19 PM Jul 11