We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Billboard Changing the Album Charts, Will Count Streaming Services
Topic Started: Nov 21 2014, 02:49 PM (433 Views)
Riverwide
Member Avatar
Administrator
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Streaming music services like Spotify have brought big changes to the music industry. But one important part of the business has not kept up: Billboard’s album chart.

Now Billboard and Nielsen SoundScan, the agency that supplies its data, will start adding streams and downloads of tracks to the formula behind the Billboard 200, which, since 1956 has functioned as the music world’s weekly scorecard. It is the biggest change since 1991, when the magazine began using hard sales data from SoundScan, a revolutionary change in a music industry that had long based its charts on highly fudgeable surveys of record stores.

The new chart, covering sales and listening from Monday to Nov. 30, will be revealed on Billboard’s website on Dec. 4 and published in print in its Dec. 13 issue. Silvio Pietroluongo, Billboard’s director of charts, said that by looking at streams as well as sales, the new chart will more accurately reflect how people listen to music these days.

“We were always limited to the initial impulse, when somebody purchased an album,” Mr. Pietroluongo said in an interview. “Now we have the ability to look at that engagement and gauge the popularity of an album over time.”

One expected result is that albums by big pop stars — which tend to open high on the chart and then plunge after just a few weeks — should linger longer in the upper rungs. Ariana Grande’s “My Everything,” for example, which opened at No. 1 in September, was No. 36 on last week’s chart, with 10,000 sales. Under the new formula, it would have been No. 9.

SoundScan and Billboard will count 1,500 song streams from services like Spotify, Beats Music, Rdio, Rhapsody and Google Play as equivalent to an album sale. For the first time, they will also count “track equivalent albums” — a common industry yardstick of 10 downloads of individual tracks — as part of the formula for album rankings on the Billboard 200.

The change is to some degree a sign of a broad reconsideration of media measurement in the digital age, as television studios, magazine publishers and others push companies like Nielsen to account for the changes in how people consume media.

It is also being welcomed by record companies that have been frustrated with the old chart’s blind spots. Daniel Glass, the founder of Glassnote Records, an independent label whose acts include Mumford & Sons and Chvrches, said that Billboard’s charts play a vital role in the industry by demonstrating the success of a new act. These days the fans of those acts may stream more albums than they buy.

“It’s been very difficult over the last two or three years to communicate the charts to radio stations,” Mr. Glass said. “I’ve been Scotch taping and Band-Aiding Shazam and Spotify, bringing in all this data for them. Now with this all-in-one streaming chart, it’s a much truer reflection of how much is being consumed.”

Album sales in the first half of the year declined 15 percent from the same period in 2013, according to SoundScan, as downloads have now joined CDs as a declining sales format. Yet streaming from so-called on-demand services like Spotify — which let people pick exactly what songs to listen to, unlike radio services — was up 42 percent in the same period.

Continue reading the main story
“Album sales have become a smaller and smaller part of the industry,” said David Bakula, a senior analyst at Nielsen. “To just look at album sales and say this is how we measure success is really leaving out that half of the business that is coming from streams and song sales.”

With each tweak Billboard makes to its charts, there is often a corresponding uproar. Last year, Billboard began counting YouTube views for the Hot 100, its pop singles chart. Critics worried at the time that the practice would reward novelty viral videos, and indeed the first beneficiary of the change was Baauer’s “Harlem Shake,” a song with modest sales but huge exposure through dance-along videos online.

For the most part, the Hot 100 has remained the dominion of the same pop hits that rule radio and download sales, although there have been exceptions. Last year, for example, a popular parody video on YouTube helped Miley Cyrus’s “Wrecking Ball” return to No. 1 after a nine-week absence.

The change may hurt artists whose albums are not on streaming services, or are mostly consumed through sales. Barbra Streisand’s “Partners,” for example, opened at No. 1 in September, and on last week’s chart it was still at No. 7, with 28,000 sales. But under Billboard’s new chart rules, it would have fallen to No. 13.

Taylor Swift’s “1989,” the biggest hit album of the year, was withheld from Spotify and other streaming outlets, and two weeks ago, it still opened at No. 1 with nearly 1.3 million sales, the biggest weekly total for any album in 12 years. On the latest chart, released by Billboard on Wednesday, “1989” holds at No. 1 for a third week, with 312,000.

“No amount of streaming in the world,” Mr. Bakula said, “could keep Taylor from No. 1.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/20/business/media/billboard-changing-the-charts-will-count-streaming-services-.html?_r=0
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Riverwide
Member Avatar
Administrator
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Counting streams towards album charts?

Utter fuckery. What a joke these charts have become.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
FuckBuddy
Member Avatar
Pensioner
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
such a ridiculous decision. i almost comprehend why such a method was adjusted to the hot 100, what with it never been entirely based on sales, but i cannot see how this is vital for the relevance of the album chart. when one buys an album, the sale only counts once. on the other hand, streaming a number of tracks included for as many times as one wishes for inflates the chart and completely annihilates the reason of its existence. albums form a body of work and this is how they're supposed to be consumed. if big selling singles are to make such an impact on the album chart, then what's the purpose of publishing two different charts? it just makes no sense. and if they do want the charts to constitute an accurate reflection of what people listen to regardless of the money they invest for doing so, then illegal downloading should also be taken into consideration when compiling those lists.

u can just tell the uk album chart will just follow this tragically conceived system fairly soon. it's so inevitable.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Beautiful Stranger
Member Avatar
Pensioner
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Streaming now also counts towards RIAA digital single SALES certifications.

Why?

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
FuckBuddy
Member Avatar
Pensioner
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
this has been the case for quite a while now. why? go figure
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Riverwide
Member Avatar
Administrator
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
More fuckery. What a joke.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Beautiful Stranger
Member Avatar
Pensioner
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
So evidently the RIAA is counting TRACK streams and sales towards their ALBUM sales certifications now.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Riverwide
Member Avatar
Administrator
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
The rot continues. :lmao:

What a complete farce.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Beautiful Stranger
Member Avatar
Pensioner
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
I don't have a problem with the concept itself as eventually streaming IS going to completely destroy album and single sales, but they really should have waited until that actually fucking happened.

On the flipside Hard Candy is now more than eligible for Platinum, and COADF 2x Platinum.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
FuckBuddy
Member Avatar
Pensioner
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
rebel heart should also be eligible for a gold certification once billboard begins counting her own face filler injections as real sales.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Beautiful Stranger
Member Avatar
Pensioner
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
As of early July digital track sales in the US were running 24.9% behind their 2015 pace, and it has been attributed mostly to streaming.

Album sales continue to collapse too of course.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums with no limits on posts or members.
Learn More · Sign-up for Free
« Previous Topic · Music Discussion · Next Topic »

Theme by Sith of the ZBTZ and Outline