| Should World Economy Be Controlled by Few | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Feb 18 2018, 11:03 AM (87 Views) | |
| Dionysus | Feb 18 2018, 11:03 AM Post #1 |
|
An increasingly number of people is becoming aware that 99% of the Earth's population is controlled by an "elite" 1%, but the Council of the 13 families consists of less than 1% of the 1% "elite" and nobody on Earth can apply for membership. In their opinion, they are entitled to rule over the rest of us because they are the direct descendants of the ancient gods and consider themselves royal. These families are: Rothschild (Bauer or Bower) Bruce Cavendish (Kennedy) De Medici Hanover Hapsburg Krupp Plantagenet Rockefeller Romanov Sinclair (St. Clair) Warburg (del Banco) Windsor (Saxe-Coburg-Gothe) http://humansarefree.com/2014/10/exposing-shadow-forces-behind-nwo.html |
![]() |
|
| Soopairik | Feb 18 2018, 11:06 AM Post #2 |
|
Administrator
|
John D Rockefeller was the one who helped design the US school system. It was so the kids could learn to work for others. |
![]() |
|
| Dionysus | Feb 18 2018, 01:32 PM Post #3 |
|
I would submit your analysis is incorrect. Boston had the first public school system long before Cleveland's Rockefeller had his fortune. I would also disagree with the premise schools teach with the purpose of providing fodder for the elite class. I do not subscribe to the government is bad anarchy is good. I believe government is to provide those services and protections we can not provide ourselves. I would submit conspiracy can not exit for long and the fear of conspiracy promoted or perpetuated by the US Government is folly. |
![]() |
|
| Soopairik | Feb 18 2018, 01:49 PM Post #4 |
|
Administrator
|
http://rockarch.org/collections/rockorgs/geb.php |
![]() |
|
| Jinfengopteryx | Feb 18 2018, 02:12 PM Post #5 |
![]()
|
If you look at any list of the world's richest people (such as Forbes), you will find members of such families to be absent. But of course, some obscure websites claiming to "expose the NWO" are the only reliable soure out there! |
![]() |
|
| Soopairik | Feb 18 2018, 02:19 PM Post #6 |
|
Administrator
|
Yeah, and further reading and research shows a lot of the links have "Illuminati" and "third world order" involved. |
![]() |
|
| Eagle | Feb 19 2018, 07:58 AM Post #7 |
|
Yeah, it's not like the government isn't composed of human beings just like us. |
![]() |
|
| Xanny | Feb 19 2018, 07:09 PM Post #8 |
![]()
|
Anyone wanna make some justifications for corporate tyranny? |
![]() |
|
| Soopairik | Feb 19 2018, 07:14 PM Post #9 |
|
Administrator
|
Corporate tyranny of 13 families controlling most of the world economy? Even though this is most likely a conspiracy? |
![]() |
|
| Xanny | Feb 19 2018, 07:17 PM Post #10 |
![]()
|
This whole nonesense is fake obviously (Romanov's are a dead give away) but the world economy is controlled by a small minority of the rich and powerful. The world's 8 richest people own as much money as the bottom 3.5 billion poorest. Edited by Xanny, Feb 19 2018, 07:19 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Soopairik | Feb 19 2018, 07:25 PM Post #11 |
|
Administrator
|
I am for equity, not equality. I am fine with someone being more rich than another person if both started out at the same opportunity level and one just so happened to work harder/faster and that's why they're more rich. Are those 8 people all hard workers? |
![]() |
|
| Xanny | Feb 20 2018, 01:12 AM Post #12 |
![]()
|
If wealth was a result of hard work every woman in Subsaharan Africa would be a millionaire. Sweatshop workers in Bangladesh or Indonesia work harder in a week than Jeff Bezos or Bill Gates ever had or will have to work in their entire lives. There is no physically possible way for someone to work so hard that can justify such absurd amounts of wealth, especially to the detriment of everyone else. Edited by Xanny, Feb 20 2018, 01:12 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Jinfengopteryx | Feb 20 2018, 02:10 AM Post #13 |
![]()
|
This is questionable, as the study you are referring to has an odd way of quantifying wealth. For example, if your material wealth is fine (i.e. that of an average Westener), but you are overburdened with debts, you are counted as having negative wealth and are among the poorest: http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26613682 |
![]() |
|
| Dionysus | Feb 20 2018, 01:28 PM Post #14 |
|
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/08/06/books/they-couldn-t-take-it-with-them.html Express. Home of the Daily and Sunday Express.express_logo Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter LOGINREGISTERAppsPuzzlesHoroscopesShopPaper6°C HOME NEWS SHOWBIZ & TV SPORT COMMENT FINANCE TRAVEL ENTERTAINMENT LIFE & STYLE LIFESTYLEHEALTHCARSGARDENFOODPROPERTYDIETSTECHSATURDAYWINS MAGTOP 10 FACTS HomeLife & StyleLifeRussian Rich Kids should heed the lessons of the Romanov family IDS stuns Umunna & BBC host as he WHIPS out list of post-Brexit CHANGES IDS stuns Umunna & BBC host as he WHIPS out list of post-Brexit… Sarah Ferguson: Prince Andrew’s ex GUSHES over royal in very public display of affection Sarah Ferguson: Prince Andrew’s ex GUSHES over royal in very… 'Your support has ERODED' Peston SNAPS at McDonnell as he's shown Labour's polling crash 'Your support has ERODED' Peston SNAPS at McDonnell as he's… Princess Margaret: Queen’s sister said THIS about ex lover Peter Townsend after reunion Princess Margaret: Queen’s sister said THIS about ex lover Peter… Jose Mourinho reveals the real reason why Alexis Sanchez quit Arsenal for Man Utd Jose Mourinho reveals the real reason why Alexis Sanchez quit… Russian Rich Kids should heed the lessons of the Romanov family IS IT acceptable to boast about being a billionaire? By GILL PAUL PUBLISHED: 00:01, Mon, Aug 8, 2016 Romanov family - Russian Rich Kids instagramGETTY/INSTAGRAM The Romanov children were raised to be respectful to others unlike the modern Russian Rich Kids Vladimir Putin is said to be annoyed with the Rich Kids of Russia who’ve been posting pictures on an Instagram page (#RRK) showing them posing on the roofs of Rolls Royces, reclining in private jets or splashing in Jacuzzis onboard superyachts. On their wrists they sport watches that cost more than the average house. The images are accompanied by mocking captions such as “Why are you guys stuck in traffic? Can’t you just buy a helicopter?” or “When you order a Mercedes matching your favourite Louboutins”. Cartoons in the press back in 1917 mocked the Romanovs, showing them gorging on caviar and lobster and lighting cigars with hundred-rouble notes while their people starved. It is true that the Tsar and his wife lived in absolute luxury but at least they raised their children to be respectful to others and to live a life of duty. The Romanovs’ wealth was like no other family that has lived since, with a net worth in today’s terms of 250–300 billion dollars – making Tsar Nicholas richer than the top twenty Russian billionaires of the 21st century combined. They had their choice of glitzy palaces – among them the Peterhof, with its spectacular gold fountains; the vast Winter Palace on the banks of the River Neva; the Catherine Palace, where there is a room with walls covered in real amber – but they preferred to live a quiet family life in a wing of the relatively modest Alexander Palace. Not for them the society balls frequented by Russian aristocrats, or the lavish tours of European capitals with an entourage in tow. https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/697439/Russian-Rich-Kids-RRK-lessons-to-learn-Romanov-family-Tsar-Nicolas-II |
![]() |
|
| Soopairik | Feb 20 2018, 03:29 PM Post #15 |
|
Administrator
|
Still looks like a big conspiracy theory. |
![]() |
|
| Dionysus | Feb 20 2018, 03:39 PM Post #16 |
|
The richest 10% hold 76% of the wealth The rich are still getting richer in the U.S., with the wealthiest 10% controlling three-quarters of all family wealth in the country. U.S. family wealth totaled $67 trillion in 2013. But slices of that pie were far from equal, according to a report released Thursday from the Congressional Budget Office. The top 10% of families -- those who had at least $942,000 -- held 76% of total wealth. The average amount of wealth in this group was $4 million. Everyone else in the top 50% of the country accounted for 23% of total wealth, with an average of $316,000 per family. That leaves just 1% of the total pie for the entire bottom half of the population. The average held was $36,000 for families that fell in the 26th to 50th percentiles. But if they fell in the bottom quarter, they had zero wealth and in fact, were $13,000 in debt on average, CBO found. Age and education made a difference in wealth accumulation. Not surprisingly, wealth was higher for households headed by someone 65 or older. Median wealth for these families was $211,000, or almost three-and-a-half times higher than the median for households run by someone 35 to 49. Families run by adults with college degrees, meanwhile, had a median wealth of $202,000, or nearly four times that of families headed by someone who only had a high school diploma. What a difference 25 years made Changes in wealth over time was also very uneven across groups. Families at the 90th percentile saw their wealth grow by 54% between 1989 and 2013. Those at the 50th percentile only experienced a 4% rise during the same period. And those at the 25th percentile actually saw their wealth drop by 6%. Related: The top 1% haven't captured all income gains What's more, the top tenth of families saw their share of the total wealth pie grow from two-thirds to more than three quarters over the 25-year period, while everyone else saw their slice shrink. http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/18/pf/wealth-inequality/index.html |
![]() |
|
| Eagle | Feb 21 2018, 09:46 AM Post #17 |
|
There's no need to go into accurate numbers in this thread. It's a known fact the richest people alive today are, in comparison to the poorest, much richer than a fair system would allow them to be. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General Political Discussion · Next Topic » |








4:49 PM Jul 10