Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Should World Economy Be Controlled by Few
Topic Started: Feb 18 2018, 11:03 AM (87 Views)
Dionysus

An increasingly number of people is becoming aware that 99% of the Earth's population is controlled by an "elite" 1%, but the Council of the 13 families consists of less than 1% of the 1% "elite" and nobody on Earth can apply for membership.

In their opinion, they are entitled to rule over the rest of us because they are the direct descendants of the ancient gods and consider themselves royal. These families are:

Rothschild (Bauer or Bower)
Bruce
Cavendish (Kennedy)
De Medici
Hanover
Hapsburg
Krupp
Plantagenet
Rockefeller
Romanov
Sinclair (St. Clair)
Warburg (del Banco)
Windsor (Saxe-Coburg-Gothe)

http://humansarefree.com/2014/10/exposing-shadow-forces-behind-nwo.html
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Soopairik
Member Avatar
Administrator
John D Rockefeller was the one who helped design the US school system. It was so the kids could learn to work for others.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dionysus

Soopairik
Feb 18 2018, 11:06 AM
John D Rockefeller was the one who helped design the US school system. It was so the kids could learn to work for others.
I would submit your analysis is incorrect. Boston had the first public school system long before Cleveland's Rockefeller had his fortune.

I would also disagree with the premise schools teach with the purpose of providing fodder for the elite class.

I do not subscribe to the government is bad anarchy is good. I believe government is to provide those services and protections we can not provide ourselves. I would submit conspiracy can not exit for long and the fear of conspiracy promoted or perpetuated by the US Government is folly.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Soopairik
Member Avatar
Administrator
http://rockarch.org/collections/rockorgs/geb.php
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jinfengopteryx
Member Avatar

Dionysus
Feb 18 2018, 11:03 AM
Rothschild (Bauer or Bower)
Bruce
Cavendish (Kennedy)
De Medici
Hanover
Hapsburg
Krupp
Plantagenet
Rockefeller
Romanov
Sinclair (St. Clair)
Warburg (del Banco)
Windsor (Saxe-Coburg-Gothe)

http://humansarefree.com/2014/10/exposing-shadow-forces-behind-nwo.html
If you look at any list of the world's richest people (such as Forbes), you will find members of such families to be absent. But of course, some obscure websites claiming to "expose the NWO" are the only reliable soure out there!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Soopairik
Member Avatar
Administrator
Yeah, and further reading and research shows a lot of the links have "Illuminati" and "third world order" involved.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Eagle

Dionysus
Feb 18 2018, 01:32 PM
I believe government is to provide those services and protections we can not provide ourselves.
Yeah, it's not like the government isn't composed of human beings just like us.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Xanny
Member Avatar

Anyone wanna make some justifications for corporate tyranny?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Soopairik
Member Avatar
Administrator
Xanny
Feb 19 2018, 07:09 PM
Anyone wanna make some justifications for corporate tyranny?
Corporate tyranny of 13 families controlling most of the world economy? Even though this is most likely a conspiracy?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Xanny
Member Avatar

Soopairik
Feb 19 2018, 07:14 PM
Xanny
Feb 19 2018, 07:09 PM
Anyone wanna make some justifications for corporate tyranny?
Corporate tyranny of 13 families controlling most of the world economy? Even though this is most likely a conspiracy?
This whole nonesense is fake obviously (Romanov's are a dead give away) but the world economy is controlled by a small minority of the rich and powerful. The world's 8 richest people own as much money as the bottom 3.5 billion poorest.
Edited by Xanny, Feb 19 2018, 07:19 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Soopairik
Member Avatar
Administrator
Xanny
Feb 19 2018, 07:17 PM
Soopairik
Feb 19 2018, 07:14 PM
Xanny
Feb 19 2018, 07:09 PM
Anyone wanna make some justifications for corporate tyranny?
Corporate tyranny of 13 families controlling most of the world economy? Even though this is most likely a conspiracy?
This whole nonesense is fake obviously (Romanov's are a dead give away) but the world economy is controlled by a small minority of the rich and powerful. The world's 8 richest people own as much money as the bottom 3.5 billion poorest.
I am for equity, not equality.

I am fine with someone being more rich than another person if both started out at the same opportunity level and one just so happened to work harder/faster and that's why they're more rich.

Are those 8 people all hard workers?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Xanny
Member Avatar

Soopairik
Feb 19 2018, 07:25 PM
Xanny
Feb 19 2018, 07:17 PM
Soopairik
Feb 19 2018, 07:14 PM
Xanny
Feb 19 2018, 07:09 PM
Anyone wanna make some justifications for corporate tyranny?
Corporate tyranny of 13 families controlling most of the world economy? Even though this is most likely a conspiracy?
This whole nonesense is fake obviously (Romanov's are a dead give away) but the world economy is controlled by a small minority of the rich and powerful. The world's 8 richest people own as much money as the bottom 3.5 billion poorest.
I am for equity, not equality.

I am fine with someone being more rich than another person if both started out at the same opportunity level and one just so happened to work harder/faster and that's why they're more rich.

Are those 8 people all hard workers?
If wealth was a result of hard work every woman in Subsaharan Africa would be a millionaire. Sweatshop workers in Bangladesh or Indonesia work harder in a week than Jeff Bezos or Bill Gates ever had or will have to work in their entire lives.

There is no physically possible way for someone to work so hard that can justify such absurd amounts of wealth, especially to the detriment of everyone else.
Edited by Xanny, Feb 20 2018, 01:12 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jinfengopteryx
Member Avatar

Xanny
Feb 19 2018, 07:17 PM
The world's 8 richest people own as much money as the bottom 3.5 billion poorest.
This is questionable, as the study you are referring to has an odd way of quantifying wealth. For example, if your material wealth is fine (i.e. that of an average Westener), but you are overburdened with debts, you are counted as having negative wealth and are among the poorest:
Quote:
 
There is a problem with Oxfam's comparison because counter-intuitively, low wealth does not mean you are poor, says Dr Anthony Shorrocks, former director of the United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research, and one of a number of respected economists behind the Credit Suisse report.

Some people in Western countries who fall into the bottom 50% for wealth may not be poor in the true sense. They might be a graduate in the UK laden with debt and no assets, or a young professional who spends all their income.
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26613682
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dionysus

Xanny
Feb 19 2018, 07:17 PM
Soopairik
Feb 19 2018, 07:14 PM
Xanny
Feb 19 2018, 07:09 PM
Anyone wanna make some justifications for corporate tyranny?
Corporate tyranny of 13 families controlling most of the world economy? Even though this is most likely a conspiracy?
This whole nonesense is fake obviously (Romanov's are a dead give away) but the world economy is controlled by a small minority of the rich and powerful. The world's 8 richest people own as much money as the bottom 3.5 billion poorest.
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/08/06/books/they-couldn-t-take-it-with-them.html

Express. Home of the Daily and Sunday Express.express_logo
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter


LOGINREGISTERAppsPuzzlesHoroscopesShopPaper6°C
HOME
NEWS
SHOWBIZ & TV
SPORT
COMMENT
FINANCE
TRAVEL
ENTERTAINMENT
LIFE & STYLE
LIFESTYLEHEALTHCARSGARDENFOODPROPERTYDIETSTECHSATURDAYWINS MAGTOP 10 FACTS
HomeLife & StyleLifeRussian Rich Kids should heed the lessons of the Romanov family
IDS stuns Umunna & BBC host as he WHIPS out list of post-Brexit CHANGES
IDS stuns Umunna & BBC host as he WHIPS out list of post-Brexit…
Sarah Ferguson: Prince Andrew’s ex GUSHES over royal in very public display of affection
Sarah Ferguson: Prince Andrew’s ex GUSHES over royal in very…
'Your support has ERODED' Peston SNAPS at McDonnell as he's shown Labour's polling crash
'Your support has ERODED' Peston SNAPS at McDonnell as he's…
Princess Margaret: Queen’s sister said THIS about ex lover Peter Townsend after reunion
Princess Margaret: Queen’s sister said THIS about ex lover Peter…
Jose Mourinho reveals the real reason why Alexis Sanchez quit Arsenal for Man Utd
Jose Mourinho reveals the real reason why Alexis Sanchez quit…
Russian Rich Kids should heed the lessons of the Romanov family
IS IT acceptable to boast about being a billionaire?
By GILL PAUL
PUBLISHED: 00:01, Mon, Aug 8, 2016







Romanov family - Russian Rich Kids instagramGETTY/INSTAGRAM

The Romanov children were raised to be respectful to others unlike the modern Russian Rich Kids
Vladimir Putin is said to be annoyed with the Rich Kids of Russia who’ve been posting pictures on an Instagram page (#RRK) showing them posing on the roofs of Rolls Royces, reclining in private jets or splashing in Jacuzzis onboard superyachts.

On their wrists they sport watches that cost more than the average house.

The images are accompanied by mocking captions such as “Why are you guys stuck in traffic? Can’t you just buy a helicopter?” or “When you order a Mercedes matching your favourite Louboutins”.

Cartoons in the press back in 1917 mocked the Romanovs, showing them gorging on caviar and lobster and lighting cigars with hundred-rouble notes while their people starved.

It is true that the Tsar and his wife lived in absolute luxury but at least they raised their children to be respectful to others and to live a life of duty.

The Romanovs’ wealth was like no other family that has lived since, with a net worth in today’s terms of 250–300 billion dollars – making Tsar Nicholas richer than the top twenty Russian billionaires of the 21st century combined.

They had their choice of glitzy palaces – among them the Peterhof, with its spectacular gold fountains; the vast Winter Palace on the banks of the River Neva; the Catherine Palace, where there is a room with walls covered in real amber – but they preferred to live a quiet family life in a wing of the relatively modest Alexander Palace.

Not for them the society balls frequented by Russian aristocrats, or the lavish tours of European capitals with an entourage in tow.
https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/697439/Russian-Rich-Kids-RRK-lessons-to-learn-Romanov-family-Tsar-Nicolas-II
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Soopairik
Member Avatar
Administrator
Still looks like a big conspiracy theory.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dionysus

Soopairik
Feb 20 2018, 03:29 PM
Still looks like a big conspiracy theory.
The richest 10% hold 76% of the wealth

The rich are still getting richer in the U.S., with the wealthiest 10% controlling three-quarters of all family wealth in the country.
U.S. family wealth totaled $67 trillion in 2013.

But slices of that pie were far from equal, according to a report released Thursday from the Congressional Budget Office.

The top 10% of families -- those who had at least $942,000 -- held 76% of total wealth. The average amount of wealth in this group was $4 million.

Everyone else in the top 50% of the country accounted for 23% of total wealth, with an average of $316,000 per family.

That leaves just 1% of the total pie for the entire bottom half of the population.

The average held was $36,000 for families that fell in the 26th to 50th percentiles. But if they fell in the bottom quarter, they had zero wealth and in fact, were $13,000 in debt on average, CBO found.

Age and education made a difference in wealth accumulation.

Not surprisingly, wealth was higher for households headed by someone 65 or older. Median wealth for these families was $211,000, or almost three-and-a-half times higher than the median for households run by someone 35 to 49.

Families run by adults with college degrees, meanwhile, had a median wealth of $202,000, or nearly four times that of families headed by someone who only had a high school diploma.

What a difference 25 years made

Changes in wealth over time was also very uneven across groups.

Families at the 90th percentile saw their wealth grow by 54% between 1989 and 2013.

Those at the 50th percentile only experienced a 4% rise during the same period.

And those at the 25th percentile actually saw their wealth drop by 6%.

Related: The top 1% haven't captured all income gains

What's more, the top tenth of families saw their share of the total wealth pie grow from two-thirds to more than three quarters over the 25-year period, while everyone else saw their slice shrink. http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/18/pf/wealth-inequality/index.html
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Eagle

There's no need to go into accurate numbers in this thread. It's a known fact the richest people alive today are, in comparison to the poorest, much richer than a fair system would allow them to be.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · General Political Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Replied