Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We've moved! Check out our new home at http://www.forums.twotailedfox.com/!
The Zetaboards message board will become read-only in the near future.

Learn more here.

We also have a Discord server! Click here to join it,
or click the "Connect" button in the widget below
(also lists who's currently online).

If you are here because of the most recent mass email
that we sent out and cannot access your account, please
reply to the email directly, and we'll get things straightened out.


Welcome to Two Tailed Fox Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit.

It looks like you aren't logged in; Have you made an account with us? Registration is effortless, free, and takes very little time. By doing this, you'll be able to access a number of member-only features, such as the ability to customize your profile, post to the boards, and access the personal messenger system.


Click here to become a member on TTFF!
Click here to visit our Guest Area.


If you're already a member, you can log in below:

Username:   Password:
Poll Only
Does anyone here find Tails "sexy"?
Topic Started: Jan 12 2009, 09:41 AM (3,731 Views)
TailsTheFoxPrower
Member Avatar
-

I say were getting off topic. xP But what does I know? Other than the fact that Tails is sexier than sex itself. :T14:
Go to Top
 
Maz
Member Avatar
Refridgerator

Strelok
Jan 24 2009, 01:53 AM
Tails Fox
Jan 14 2009, 10:37 PM
Strelok
Jan 14 2009, 05:28 PM
F40PH
Jan 14 2009, 12:44 AM
Bestiality and being a furry are two different things.

Technically they are, they are both animals, or at least belong to the the same kingdom of animal.

But that doesn't mean all furrys are attracted to real animals, either. That is a small minority of the fandom

All I said was Furries do go under Bestiality, since they are Anthromoporphic animals. You mis-understood.

EDIT : ADMINS ARE AGAINST OPINIONS.

Bad Admin. Bad.

He's a Super Mod, just so you know :T0:

Go to Top
 
CrashGordon94


Okay, In response to the "Furry v. Bestiality" thing, I have something to say.
I like like cartoon animals (More specifically, Tails, Blaze and Amy) but not real ones.
Go to Top
 
Durandel
Member Avatar
Scavengers are Survivors.

Sunshine the fox
Jan 24 2009, 04:22 AM
F40PH
Jan 24 2009, 03:20 AM
Strelok
Jan 24 2009, 01:53 AM
Tails Fox
Jan 14 2009, 10:37 PM
Strelok
Jan 14 2009, 05:28 PM
F40PH
Jan 14 2009, 12:44 AM
Bestiality and being a furry are two different things.

Technically they are, they are both animals, or at least belong to the the same kingdom of animal.

But that doesn't mean all furrys are attracted to real animals, either. That is a small minority of the fandom

All I said was Furries do go under Bestiality, since they are Anthromoporphic animals. You mis-understood.

EDIT : ADMINS ARE AGAINST OPINIONS.

Bad Admin. Bad.

does that make having sex with a human beastiality since we were descended from monkeys?

LOL Some people don't believe in Evolution. (Like me) But I do agree that furries are NOT part of Bestiality! Because I'm one, and I'm not attracted to real animals! (eww)

:T1:

You're not a furry.

Yes, since we technically are sentient animals, it is bestality until proven otherwise.
Posted Image
Go to Top
 
F40PH
Member Avatar
I'M DOOM

Strelok
Jan 24 2009, 10:03 PM
Sunshine the fox
Jan 24 2009, 04:22 AM
F40PH
Jan 24 2009, 03:20 AM
Strelok
Jan 24 2009, 01:53 AM
Tails Fox
Jan 14 2009, 10:37 PM
Strelok
Jan 14 2009, 05:28 PM
F40PH
Jan 14 2009, 12:44 AM
Bestiality and being a furry are two different things.

Technically they are, they are both animals, or at least belong to the the same kingdom of animal.

But that doesn't mean all furrys are attracted to real animals, either. That is a small minority of the fandom

All I said was Furries do go under Bestiality, since they are Anthromoporphic animals. You mis-understood.

EDIT : ADMINS ARE AGAINST OPINIONS.

Bad Admin. Bad.

does that make having sex with a human beastiality since we were descended from monkeys?

LOL Some people don't believe in Evolution. (Like me) But I do agree that furries are NOT part of Bestiality! Because I'm one, and I'm not attracted to real animals! (eww)

:T1:

You're not a furry.

Yes, since we technically are sentient animals, it is bestality until proven otherwise.

Which then makes the word beastiality redundant, correct?
Posted Image

Go to Top
 
Sunshine the fox
Member Avatar
Hanging in there...

Strelok
Jan 24 2009, 10:03 PM
Sunshine the fox
Jan 24 2009, 04:22 AM
F40PH
Jan 24 2009, 03:20 AM
Strelok
Jan 24 2009, 01:53 AM
Tails Fox
Jan 14 2009, 10:37 PM
Strelok
Jan 14 2009, 05:28 PM
F40PH
Jan 14 2009, 12:44 AM
Bestiality and being a furry are two different things.

Technically they are, they are both animals, or at least belong to the the same kingdom of animal.

But that doesn't mean all furrys are attracted to real animals, either. That is a small minority of the fandom

All I said was Furries do go under Bestiality, since they are Anthromoporphic animals. You mis-understood.

EDIT : ADMINS ARE AGAINST OPINIONS.

Bad Admin. Bad.

does that make having sex with a human beastiality since we were descended from monkeys?

LOL Some people don't believe in Evolution. (Like me) But I do agree that furries are NOT part of Bestiality! Because I'm one, and I'm not attracted to real animals! (eww)

:T1:

You're not a furry.

Yes, since we technically are sentient animals, it is bestality until proven otherwise.

Um, yes I am a furry. That's not really for you to judge... You don't have to dress up in a fursuit to be one, you know...

But we are getting way off topic here. What I was saying is that there is nothing wrong with thinking that a character is attracting. Nothing to be ashamed of if you DO think he is "sexy"...
Go to Top
 
Swifty the Fox
Member Avatar


Yea theres nothing wrong with it, And if people says its weried and what not, they are so pathectic by judging someone and thier opinions.
Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
Go to Top
 
Lobster
Member Avatar
One Tailed Lobster

Swifty the Fox
Jan 25 2009, 03:40 PM
Yea theres nothing wrong with it, And if people says its weried and what not, they are so pathectic by judging someone and thier opinions.

Hold on just a mo' there. I'm not against somebody finding Tails sexy or whatever, it's not like they're evil nor do they really have a lot of control over it. But other people have their own opinions as well. You say that they're pathetic by judging someone and their opinions? Nobody said they were judging people. In fact, you're the one who's judging them. They have their own opinions, and you can't change that, so honestly, you're doing the same thing as them in a sense. I wouldn't call them pathetic.

Also, as said before, I don't find Tails sexy nor attractive in the least, but I don't have a problem with people if they do.
Posted Image
Go to Top
 
Edwardvs Rex
Member Avatar
Charlie (1995-2008), painted by my hand, in his memory.

well I would like to point out that a lot of the people on the internet who like characters in Sonic i.e. Tails or indeed in anyother furry cartoon who are above the age of 16 are indeed sexually interested in furries. I read the stats are around 75% of internet users and that's not counting those who are lying. There's no shame in it. Animal fetishes including furries and real animals is the one fetish which is most natural of all fetishes. We are basically animals, if you strip away our morals and advanced intellect then we are simply mammals. Our primal instincts tell us subconciously that animals are just a race. All fetishes are uncontrollable including fetishes such as: necrophilia (sexual lust for death), suffocation, sedistic (hurting others), masacistic (being hurt), peadophilia etc. I'm not saying that lusting for your pet dog or a cartoon character is a good thing, I'm merely making people aware that it is very common and uncontrolable in most if not all cases.

All fetishes have rational and logical meaning behind them take for example: peadophilia, the lusting for children. I think its discusting but there is logic in it. The turn on for peados is the idea that they are taking away the innocence of a child. A child is the one creature which is shielded from the corrupted, primordial and complicated world of adulthood and indeed sex; by taking away the child's innocence, that child is forced to be dragged down into the same corrupt difficulties as any other adult.

I would just like to point out though that I'm not a furry or into beastiality and I'm definately not a peadophile.
Posted Image

Hi [you] please visit our forum HFF, a Tails forum which is starting a fresh ^^ Here's our button:
Posted Image


Hi [you] please join Artist Canvas. Its an art forum for all people with all skills. Here's our button:
Posted Image
Go to Top
 
Durandel
Member Avatar
Scavengers are Survivors.

Sunshine the fox
Jan 25 2009, 01:52 AM
Strelok
Jan 24 2009, 10:03 PM
Sunshine the fox
Jan 24 2009, 04:22 AM
F40PH
Jan 24 2009, 03:20 AM
Strelok
Jan 24 2009, 01:53 AM
Tails Fox
Jan 14 2009, 10:37 PM
Strelok
Jan 14 2009, 05:28 PM
F40PH
Jan 14 2009, 12:44 AM
Bestiality and being a furry are two different things.

Technically they are, they are both animals, or at least belong to the the same kingdom of animal.

But that doesn't mean all furrys are attracted to real animals, either. That is a small minority of the fandom

All I said was Furries do go under Bestiality, since they are Anthromoporphic animals. You mis-understood.

EDIT : ADMINS ARE AGAINST OPINIONS.

Bad Admin. Bad.

does that make having sex with a human beastiality since we were descended from monkeys?

LOL Some people don't believe in Evolution. (Like me) But I do agree that furries are NOT part of Bestiality! Because I'm one, and I'm not attracted to real animals! (eww)

:T1:

You're not a furry.

Yes, since we technically are sentient animals, it is bestality until proven otherwise.

Um, yes I am a furry. That's not really for you to judge... You don't have to dress up in a fursuit to be one, you know...

But we are getting way off topic here. What I was saying is that there is nothing wrong with thinking that a character is attracting. Nothing to be ashamed of if you DO think he is "sexy"...

Your a human, part of the Homo Sapien Kingdom, you aren't a furry, I'm not judging, if you WERE a real furry, I'd be watching you on a news report.

Swifty - I agree with Ronorao on this. An eye for an eye.

F40PH - Yes, it is redundant.
Posted Image
Go to Top
 
Missy
Member Avatar
mrow

I think you guys mixed up what a furry is. From what I've seen, they look like animalxhuman crossbreeds. A tails recolor is NOT a furry
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
Go to Top
 
Sunshine the fox
Member Avatar
Hanging in there...

Strelok
Jan 26 2009, 12:37 AM
Sunshine the fox
Jan 25 2009, 01:52 AM
Strelok
Jan 24 2009, 10:03 PM
Sunshine the fox
Jan 24 2009, 04:22 AM
F40PH
Jan 24 2009, 03:20 AM
Strelok
Jan 24 2009, 01:53 AM
Tails Fox
Jan 14 2009, 10:37 PM
Strelok
Jan 14 2009, 05:28 PM
F40PH
Jan 14 2009, 12:44 AM
Bestiality and being a furry are two different things.

Technically they are, they are both animals, or at least belong to the the same kingdom of animal.

But that doesn't mean all furrys are attracted to real animals, either. That is a small minority of the fandom

All I said was Furries do go under Bestiality, since they are Anthromoporphic animals. You mis-understood.

EDIT : ADMINS ARE AGAINST OPINIONS.

Bad Admin. Bad.

does that make having sex with a human beastiality since we were descended from monkeys?

LOL Some people don't believe in Evolution. (Like me) But I do agree that furries are NOT part of Bestiality! Because I'm one, and I'm not attracted to real animals! (eww)

:T1:

You're not a furry.

Yes, since we technically are sentient animals, it is bestality until proven otherwise.

Um, yes I am a furry. That's not really for you to judge... You don't have to dress up in a fursuit to be one, you know...

But we are getting way off topic here. What I was saying is that there is nothing wrong with thinking that a character is attracting. Nothing to be ashamed of if you DO think he is "sexy"...

Your a human, part of the Homo Sapien Kingdom, you aren't a furry, I'm not judging, if you WERE a real furry, I'd be watching you on a news report.

Swifty - I agree with Ronorao on this. An eye for an eye.

F40PH - Yes, it is redundant.

Yes, I meant like as in a fandom.

Also Missy: It really depends on the way the author wants it. I have seen fan pictures of Tails on furry sites before. Also, Some people actually refer Sonic characters as "furries"...
Go to Top
 
Durandel
Member Avatar
Scavengers are Survivors.

Missy
Jan 26 2009, 04:42 PM
I think you guys mixed up what a furry is. From what I've seen, they look like animalxhuman crossbreeds. A tails recolor is NOT a furry

Yes they are, Furries are anthropomorphic animals, thus all fictional bipedal and sentient animals are furries, since most animals cannot stand on 2 legs except for a few, adapted species. Furries include Sonic, all the recolors and fan characters, and yes, Tails.

Furries are fictional anthropomorphic animal characters with human personalities and characteristics. Examples of anthropomorphic attributes include exhibiting human intelligence and facial expressions, the ability to speak, walk on two legs, and wear clothes.

This was extracted from a viabal source.
Posted Image
Go to Top
 
F40PH
Member Avatar
I'M DOOM

Strelok
Jan 27 2009, 01:48 AM
Missy
Jan 26 2009, 04:42 PM
I think you guys mixed up what a furry is. From what I've seen, they look like animalxhuman crossbreeds. A tails recolor is NOT a furry

Yes they are, Furries are anthropomorphic animals, thus all fictional bipedal and sentient animals are furries, since most animals cannot stand on 2 legs except for a few, adapted species. Furries include Sonic, all the recolors and fan characters, and yes, Tails.

Furries are fictional anthropomorphic animal characters with human personalities and characteristics. Examples of anthropomorphic attributes include exhibiting human intelligence and facial expressions, the ability to speak, walk on two legs, and wear clothes.

This was extracted from a viabal source.

Just posting to confirm that this, indeed, is the definition of a "furry".
Posted Image

Go to Top
 
Sunshine the fox
Member Avatar
Hanging in there...

F40PH
Jan 27 2009, 03:18 AM
Strelok
Jan 27 2009, 01:48 AM
Missy
Jan 26 2009, 04:42 PM
I think you guys mixed up what a furry is. From what I've seen, they look like animalxhuman crossbreeds. A tails recolor is NOT a furry

Yes they are, Furries are anthropomorphic animals, thus all fictional bipedal and sentient animals are furries, since most animals cannot stand on 2 legs except for a few, adapted species. Furries include Sonic, all the recolors and fan characters, and yes, Tails.

Furries are fictional anthropomorphic animal characters with human personalities and characteristics. Examples of anthropomorphic attributes include exhibiting human intelligence and facial expressions, the ability to speak, walk on two legs, and wear clothes.

This was extracted from a viabal source.

Just posting to confirm that this, indeed, is the definition of a "furry".

Unless you make a "human" version of your character. lol
Go to Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community.
Learn More · Register Now
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Miles "Tails" Prower · Next Topic »
Poll Only

View Tweets from TTFF and other Sonic sites