Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to World1945. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Egyptian - British War In Sudan
Topic Started: Jul 29 2008, 06:03 PM (1,004 Views)
USSR
Member Avatar
Proletarii vsekh stran, soyedinyaytes!
[ *  *  * ]
USSR suggest, that we return to the topic of this meeting, which is the Egyptian - British War and not the Tibet war.

Would the United States of America, Great Brititan and France agree to Canadian and Polish Forces, which are supported by Soviet logisitcs troops?
Soviet Union
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Egypt
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Great Britain
Jul 30 2008, 04:34 AM
In reference to the last two points, interestingly this was the direction the Sudan was headed until the Egyptians moved in.

The Egyptian intervention in Sudan was the right thing to do considering the near-anarchic state of the country, and within our rights in the Codominium. Of course, this means little to the imperialist British.

This matter is as much a British internal matter as Egyptian internal matter. Nonetheless, we are willing to agree to a UN-sponsered cease-fire and referendum on the status of the country. More specifically, we support the Soviet Union's original proposal.
Representatives of the Kingdom of Egypt
[URL=http://z15.invisionfree.com/World1945/index.php?showtopic=200]Our Embassy[/URL] [URL=http://z15.invisionfree.com/World1945/index.php?showtopic=256&st=0]Invest in Egypt[/URL]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Great Britain
Member Avatar
Land of Hope and Glory
[ *  *  * ]
USSR
Jul 30 2008, 08:32 AM
USSR suggest, that we return to the topic of this meeting, which is the Egyptian - British War and not the Tibet war.

Would the United States of America, Great Brititan and France agree to Canadian and Polish Forces, which are supported by Soviet logisitcs troops?

I can only agree to such measures if something similar is implemented in Tibet.
I do not see why one situation should be specially chosen and not the other, as if we are really interested in peace talk, both need to be discussed.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
USSR
Member Avatar
Proletarii vsekh stran, soyedinyaytes!
[ *  *  * ]
We are very surprised, that the British people still want to see british soldiers die in the hot desert sand.

It was our intention to solve one problem and not connect it with another. We should focus on solving this conflict. Or does Great Britain wants to see more their "boys" comming home in coffins? Instead we urge Britian to work more activly on a solution.

Soviet Union agrees, that both situations have to be discussed, but currently this meeting is held for the discussion in the Sudan problem.

If Great Britian does not show any willingness to solve, Soviet Union will not make a proposal for a resolution.
Soviet Union
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Great Britain
Member Avatar
Land of Hope and Glory
[ *  *  * ]
Unfortunately you misunderstand the British will to complete what they have started, and we all understand, from the lowest to the highest, the duty involved in bringing the Sudan to a peaceful, strong conclusion.

May I ask that, before we continue, you answer why you feel you can support a Parliamentary Democracy in the Soudan being implemented? This would seem to go against your entire worldview and I am not sure I can believe that it is entirely for the Soudan's sake.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
USSR
Member Avatar
Proletarii vsekh stran, soyedinyaytes!
[ *  *  * ]
May we answer with a counter question:

Can you accept a communist goverment in Sudan? And why are you so sure, that the people choose a parlamentary democracy?

Quote:
 
I can only agree to such measures if something similar is implemented in Tibet.
I do not see why one situation should be specially chosen and not the other, as if we are really interested in peace talk, both need to be discussed.


Those are you words, Mr. Foreign secretary. You showed that you only want to agree to a UN resolution, if there is also the same solution for Tibet, which is a completly different question for the Soviet Union.
Soviet Union
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Great Britain
Member Avatar
Land of Hope and Glory
[ *  *  * ]
Unfortunately, Mr Stalin, the United Kingdom would in no way agree to a Communist Regime in the Soudan, and if the UN force us to install a Communist government, we would veto it.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
India
Member Avatar
Satyameva Jayate
[ *  *  * ]
India still insists that the Tibetan and Sudanese De-Militarized Zones be tied together to ensure that both conflicts are resolved without any significant loss to any parties. India favors the Canadian proposal and moves that the Tibetan force is made of Soviet and Indian peacekeepers.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
USSR
Member Avatar
Proletarii vsekh stran, soyedinyaytes!
[ *  *  * ]
Quote:
 
Unfortunately, Mr Stalin, the United Kingdom would in no way agree to a Communist Regime in the Soudan, and if the UN force us to install a Communist government, we would veto it.


The United Kingdom of Great Britian and Northern Ireland would veto the free will of the people. We applaude. This is how you see the freewill of the people to decide and elect their own goverment.

Thus, if there is no equality of govermental system, we do not see further needs for discussion, until the British imperialist are willing to understand, that people may have another opinion, than those ladies and gentleman in London. We demand the equality and the free choice of the People in Sudan, to elect and choose their preferd govermental system and not a dictated one from London.

Further we urge, not to hinder this issue by connecting it to other difficult questions. Those actions are not very usefull in this sense. We agree, that there should be meeting regarding the Tibet war, but it is very unwise to mix up two different issues.

Soviet Union
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Great Britain
Member Avatar
Land of Hope and Glory
[ *  *  * ]
Unfortunately you misunderstand us. Once we leave the Soudan, they can do whatever they wish. But we are not going to abandon them without a strong government.

And we do not give in to Soviet demands, please remember that.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Israel
Member Avatar
Medīnat Yisrā'el
[ *  *  * ]
We support the British position. We condemn the Egyptians for entering their troops unlegally into Sudan, and trying to impose the wrong, evil methods of Communism on the free people of Sudan, who are under protection of the British Empire.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Egypt
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Sudan is EGYPTIAN TERRITORY. We consider the intervention necessary to stop the chaos in Sudan and restore stability. If anyone overreacts, it is the British and the unwise and warhungry politicians back in London, who flatly refuses to recognise Egyptian rights in Sudan, and sent an army to engage in hostile actions against the Egyptian peacekeepers, destabilising the entire country.

History will condemn the British for acting in this way. To the families of the British servicemen killed in action in Sudan, know this - your sons died because of the blunders of your leaders.
Representatives of the Kingdom of Egypt
[URL=http://z15.invisionfree.com/World1945/index.php?showtopic=200]Our Embassy[/URL] [URL=http://z15.invisionfree.com/World1945/index.php?showtopic=256&st=0]Invest in Egypt[/URL]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Israel
Member Avatar
Medīnat Yisrā'el
[ *  *  * ]
It won't help you to shout. The United Nations is not a place to spread Communist falseful propganda and lies. The world knows the truth, there is no need to make falseful claims. Sudan is a British protectorate, not an Egyptian territory.

- Abba Eban, Israeli UN representive.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Egypt
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Sudan is, or was before the foolish British invasion, an Anglo-Egyptian Codominium. Egypt has sovereignty over the territory.

We are shocked at the poor knowledge of the Israelis concerning regional affairs. But it is only to be expected - the Zionist settlers are newcomers who have built a foreign colony on stolen Arab land.

The United Nations is a forum for all the peoples of the world to voice their opinions. It is not an exclusive place for imperialists like the Zionists to peddle THEIR propaganda, either.
Representatives of the Kingdom of Egypt
[URL=http://z15.invisionfree.com/World1945/index.php?showtopic=200]Our Embassy[/URL] [URL=http://z15.invisionfree.com/World1945/index.php?showtopic=256&st=0]Invest in Egypt[/URL]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Great Britain
Member Avatar
Land of Hope and Glory
[ *  *  * ]
I did not see any Pro Israeli statements being made, so if anything, it is going evenly both ways.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · The United Nations · Next Topic »
Add Reply