| Welcome to Survivor 2016. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The Lion King; A critique through the lens of White Supremacy | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jan 12 2016, 01:04 PM (13 Views) | |
| Ronald Reagan | Jan 12 2016, 01:04 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Administrator
|
The Lion King was created when Tribesman Michael Eisner, Disney CEO, implemented his strategy of churning out movies with non-White themes. So it is an African movie with African "singing" in the background, James Earl Jones doing the king’s voice, the female love interest being voiced by a shegress, and the wise old baboon having many Black tribal characteristics. But the story is amazingly pertinent: The lions rule the savannah because they are the best rulers and make no excuses for that; it’s the "circle of life". (An expression misunderstood by leftoids ever since.) The dirty hyenas are kept outside the borders. The lion Scar is black-maned, cunning and vicious, but still accepted by the lions as one of them. Though they don’t trust him, and tell jokes about him and they foolishly let him stay. Scar backstabs the king, and forces the prince Simba to inaction by filling him with false guilt. He then floods the savannah with immigrating hyenas, using them as his power base when he takes control. He holds a speech about living together for a glorious future, contrasting with the image of the evil hyenas approaching. Soon the lions are starving under Scar’s misrule. Scar and the hyenas become fed up with each other, and Scar has in fact despised them the whole time. Simba, filled with guilt, adopts an irresponsible, selfish ideology called "hakuna matata". (Unsurprisingly treated as something positive by leftoids ever since.) He learns this ideology from weaker animals who explicitly set out to snare his mind in order to use him, something they never tell him. They turn him away from his natural hunting instinct. When Simba speaks of his ancestors, the pride and duty his father told him to feel, they laugh in his face until he abandons that line of thinking. In the end though Simba shakes off the "hakuna matata" ideology and goes to take back his ancestral land, as is his duty. Scar’s reign ends in blood and fire – fittingly he is killed by the hyenas as he tries to curry favor with the victorious Simba. Simba did not repeat his father’s mistake of permitting the black-maned Scar to live among the better lions as one of them. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Exile · Next Topic » |
| Theme: Zeta Original | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
8:58 PM Jul 10
|







8:58 PM Jul 10