| Welcome to Survivor 2016. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| This is good | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Apr 7 2016, 07:46 PM (1,847 Views) | |
| Barbara Boxer | Apr 7 2016, 07:46 PM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Thanks for putting me somewhere towards the top Chafee
|
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Barbara Boxer | Apr 9 2016, 10:43 PM Post #41 |
![]()
|
I don't think tulsi would be angry she said she would only be willing to vote out a hawk on our tribe. As long as trump is safe she will be fine. If that's a concern I wouldn't be worried about it |
![]() |
|
| Lincoln Chafee | Apr 9 2016, 10:49 PM Post #42 |
![]()
|
By "she said she would only be willing to vote out a hawk on our tribe" you're saying the vote's going to be on Ted if you guys lose, right? Just making sure I understand you. My idea is that maybe you'd be able to spin the vote onto, say, Vermin (with a similar thing occurring on the third tribe) if we show them through our vote that we're not thinking "pagong" - I would like to keep Arnold in but I'm not sure Trump would be down to work with us if we force him through this into a precarious 4-1 tribe situation. |
![]() |
|
| Barbara Boxer | Apr 9 2016, 11:04 PM Post #43 |
![]()
|
Maybe I could have convinced her but she said clearly that it was going to be a hawk and that it wouldn't be me so. |
![]() |
|
| Lincoln Chafee | Apr 9 2016, 11:15 PM Post #44 |
![]()
|
Oh, okay. Was just wondering for clarity's sake. I'm hearing similar from Trump now about where her mind is at. I think voting Arnold probably is the right thing to do, might make Palmetto less likely to become a pagonging. The issue is just me being unsure whether or not those Palmetto Hawkeyes (Rubio and Hillary) will get pissed, but meh. This is pretty frustrating, but just because I feel like I'm reading too far into it. |
![]() |
|
| Barbara Boxer | Apr 9 2016, 11:17 PM Post #45 |
![]()
|
For tulsi would be "sad but not devastated" and said Carson would likely be loyal to us if you spared him |
![]() |
|
| Barbara Boxer | Apr 9 2016, 11:17 PM Post #46 |
![]()
|
Ftr* |
![]() |
|
| Lincoln Chafee | Apr 9 2016, 11:21 PM Post #47 |
![]()
|
I'm thinking we're better off voting out Arnold though. After all I'm assuming we're going to get Jindal after this TC so if we need there will still be a Hawkeye majority. |
![]() |
|
| Barbara Boxer | Apr 9 2016, 11:26 PM Post #48 |
![]()
|
Yeah I trust you I mean I like Arnold but Im not there you are and if you think talking to Carson he's a better ally I trust your judgment |
![]() |
|
| Barbara Boxer | Apr 9 2016, 11:27 PM Post #49 |
![]()
|
How does Martin feel |
![]() |
|
| Lincoln Chafee | Apr 9 2016, 11:56 PM Post #50 |
![]()
|
It might be the way I suggested it and the fact that I suggested it before I had seriously thought it, but his reaction is that we should think about it when we're both thinking more clearly. I don't want to do this without him but I'm feeling more and more like the Ben vote would be more damaging to the former Hawkeyes than the Arnold vote would be (especially considering the Palmetto situation that could go either way). (Edit clarity) Edited by Lincoln Chafee, Apr 9 2016, 11:57 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Chafee/Boxer · Next Topic » |
| Theme: Zeta Original | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
3:26 PM Jul 11
|








3:26 PM Jul 11